Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T06:15:13.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foundations of mathematics for the working mathematician

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

N. Bourbaki
N. Bourbaki*
Affiliation:
University of Nancago
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I am very grateful to the Association for Symbolic Logic for inviting me to give this address—an honor which I am conscious of having done very little to deserve. My efforts during the last fifteen years (seconded by those of a number of younger collaborators, whose devoted help has meant more to me than I can adequately express) have been directed wholly towards a unified exposition of all the basic branches of mathematics, resting on as solid foundations as I could hope to provide. I have been working on this as a practical mathematician; in matters pertaining to pure logic, I must confess to being self-taught, and laboring under all the handicaps that this implies; and if, after no little self-questioning, I am speaking here today, I am doing so chiefly in order to enjoy the benefit of your professional advice and criticism, by which I hope to correct my views before I venture into print with them.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , 16 May 1949 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1949

References

An address delivered, by invitation of the Program Committee, at the eleventh meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, at Columbus, Ohio, on December 31, 1948.

1 This will usually be of oblong shape, according to the length of the formula inside it.

2 My attention has been drawn to the fact that American logicians use the word “relation” with another meaning. I shall, however, go on using it here in the sense to which I am accustomed, and which is in agreement with French usage.

3 For typographical reasons, parentheses had to be substituted for surrounding lines wherever these occurred in the present address; thus, “not (R)” takes the place of “not ®”.