Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T02:09:27.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social clustering in 5th-c. Constantinople: the evidence of the Notitia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2016

Benjamin Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of the History of Art, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, bwa32@cornell.edu

Extract

Clustering of residents of similar social status, ethnic or religious identity, or geographical origin into distinct areas of a city is a “common, but by no means universal, attribute of urban neighborhoods”. Different cities within a single culture and era exhibit diversity in the occurrence and nature of clustering: “there is no such thing as a ‘typical’ pattern of clustering within, say, Medieval cities or Islamic cities”.

The existence and nature of clustering in Roman cities have rarely been the object of systematic study, and most contributions have focused on textual evidence for clustering in the city of Rome. A recent consideration of Rome under the Principate finds

no evidence for strong clustering along social lines. The evidence points rather to the reverse: social mixing, at all levels.

Similarly, a study of the neighborhoods of Augustan Rome observes that,

although areas of the city might develop reputations as more or less desirable, ancient Rome was not generally segregated by class. Apartment buildings for poorer residents existed alongside the houses of more affluent residents in almost every quarter of the city.

Type
Archaeological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of Roman Archaeology L.L.C. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)