No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
La grandiosa imitazione. Il grande Plastico di Pompei. - D. Malfitana, G. Amara, and A. Mazzaglia, eds. 2020. La grandiosa imitazione: il plastico di Pompei. Dal modello materico al modello digitale. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider. Pp. 328. ISBN 9788891319937.
Review products
D. Malfitana, G. Amara, and A. Mazzaglia, eds. 2020. La grandiosa imitazione: il plastico di Pompei. Dal modello materico al modello digitale. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider. Pp. 328. ISBN 9788891319937.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2023
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Anderson, M. A. 2020. “Structure from motion and archaeological excavation: Experiences of the Via Consolare Project in Pompeii.” Studies in Digital Heritage 4: 78–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzani, M., Santopuoli, N., Grieco, A., and Zaltron, N.. 2004. “Laser scanner 3D survey in archaeological field: The Forum of Pompeii.” In International Conference on Remote Sensing Archaeology: October 18–21, 2004. Beijing, China, 169–75. Beijing: Joint Laboratory of Remote Sensing Archaeology in affiliation to the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ministry of Education, and State Bureau of Cultural Relics.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 2016. “A tale of two sites: Ludwig I's Pompejanum and the House of the Dioscuri in Pompeii.” In Returns to Pompeii. Interior Space and Decoration Documented and Revived in the 18th–20th Century, ed. Hales, S. and Leander Touati, A.-M., 183–215. Acta Instituti Romani Regni Sueciae 62. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet.Google Scholar
Bonacchi, C. 2013. “The development of Public Archaeology in Italy: A review of recent efforts.” Public Archaeology 12: 211–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessales, H., ed. 2020. The Villa of Diomedes: The Making of a Roman Villa in Pompeii. Paris: Hermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiteljorg, H. 1995. “Single-photo photogrammetry at Pompeii in 1995.” Pompeii Forum Project. http://pompeii.virginia.edu/ann-rpts/95/pg-95.html.Google Scholar
Forte, M. 2006. “Tra conoscenza e comunicazione in archeologia: considerazioni in margine alla terza dimensione.” In Laser scanner e GPS. Paesaggi archeologici e tecnologie digitali, ed. Francovich, R. and Campana, S., 23–40. Florence: All'Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
Fichera, M. G., Malnati, L., and Mancincelli, M. L.. 2015. “Grande progetto Pompei: la direzione generale per le antichita e il piano della conoscenza.” In Il SITAR nella Rete della ricerca italiana. Verso la conoscenza archeologica condivisa. Atti del III Convegno (Roma, Museo Nazionale Romano, 23-24 maggio 2013), ed. Serlorenzi, M. and Leoni, G., 25–31. Sesto Fiorentino: Archeologia e Calcolatori.Google Scholar
Gilpin, W. 1792. Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty; On Picturesque Travel; and On Sketching Landscape: To Which is Added a Poem, On Landscape Painting. London: R. Blamire.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. 2015. The Museum of Augustus: The Temple of Apollo in Pompeii, the Portico of Philippus in Rome, and Latin Poetry. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Hori, Y., Ajioka, O., and Hanghai, A. 2007. “Laser scanning in Pompeian city wall: A comparative study of accuracy of the drawings from 1930s to 40s.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives 36. https://www.isprs.org/proceedings/xxxvi/5-w47/pdf/hori_etal.pdf.Google Scholar
Kockel, V. 1993. “Das Haus des Sallust in Pompeji. Eine dreidimensionale archäologische Dokumentation aus dem 19. Jahrhundert.” In Rom über die Alpen tragen. Fürsten sammeln antike Architektur: Die Aschaffenburger Korkmodelle, ed. Helmberger, W. and Kockel, V., 134–48, 345–47. Landshut-Ergolding: Arcos.Google Scholar
Kockel, V. 1998. Phelloplastica: modelli in sughero dell'architettura antica nel XVIII secolo nella collezione di Gustavo III di Svezia. Jonesred: Åström.Google Scholar
Kockel, V. 2004. “Towns and tombs. Three-dimensional documentation of archaeological sites in the Kingdom of Naples in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century.” In Archives and Excavations: Essays on the History of Archaeological Excavations in Rome and Southern Italy from the Renaissance to the Nineteenth Century, ed. Bignamini, I., 143–62. London: British School at Rome.Google Scholar
Mindrup, M. 2019. The Architectural Model: Histories of the Miniature and the Prototype, the Exemplar and the Muse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moormann, E. M. 2018. “The appreciation of Pompeii's architectural remains in the late 18th and early 19th Century.” Architectural Histories 6: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, B., and Caraher, W., eds. 2015. Visions of Substance: 3D Imaging in Mediterranean Archaeology. Grand Forks, ND: The Digital Press at The University of North Dakota.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overbeck, J. 1866/1884. Pompeji in seinen Gebäuden, Alterthümern und Kunstwerken. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Poehler, E. 2023. “Pompeii as archive.” In Shaping Archaeological Archives: Dialogues between Fieldwork, Museum Collection, and Private Archives, ed. Raja, R., 127–42. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poehler, E., and Ellis, S.. 2012. “The 2011 season of the Pompeii Quadriporticus Project: The southern and northern sides.” The Journal of Fasti Online 249: 1–12.Google Scholar
Ripanti, F. 2017. “Italian public archaeology on fieldwork: An overview.” Archeostorie. Journal of Public Archaeology 1: 93–104.Google Scholar
Ruesch, A. 1911. Guide illustré du Musée National de Naples, approuvé par le Ministère de l'Instruction Publique. Naples: Richter.Google Scholar
Van der Poel, H. B. 1981. Corpus Topographicum Pompeianum. Pars V. Cartography. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar