Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:02:11.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-assessment and instructor assessment: Contribution to supervision in a brief counselling skills training program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2015

Erica Frydenberg  and
Vicki McKenzie
Erica Frydenberg
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Vicki McKenzie
Affiliation:
Ministry of Education & Training, Victoria
Get access

Extract

Whilst there are many critical elements in the teaching of micro-counselling skills, feedback is an essential component of an effective training program. This paper describes supervision linked to a program of instruction. More particularly it examines the relative merit and contribution of utilising both instructor rating and self-rating as a means of providing educative feedback during the process of supervision in a brief counselling training program. Instructor rating and self-rating measures were taken on two occasions, first at the commencement of a six-week training program and secondly at the completion of the course. It was found that instructor rating was consistently lower than self-rating, but both reflected an improvement in counselling skills acquisition. Students indicated an ability to be self-critical after a period of counselling training to the extent that instructor rating matched more closely self-rating, after the second interview.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 2 , November 1992 , pp. 17 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barak, A., & LaCrosse, M. B. (1977). Comparative perceptions of practicum counselor behavior. Counselor Education and Supervision, 16, 203–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beutler, L., Johnson, D., Neville, C, & Workman, S. (1973). Some sources of variance in “accurate empathy” ratings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 167–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowman, C.A., & Ramirez, D. (1975). Evaluating counseling practicum students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 15, 48–54.Google Scholar
Carkhuff, R. R. (1969). Helping and human relations (Vol. 1). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Egan, G. (1982). The skilled helper. Montery, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Evans, D. R., Hearn, M. T., Uhlemann, M. R., & Ivey, A. E. (1984). Essential interviewing. Montery, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Ford, J.D. (1979). Research on training counselors and clinicians. Review of Educational Research, 49, 87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazda, G. M. (1984). Multiple impact training: A life skills approach. In Larson, D. (Ed.), Teaching psychological skills: Models for giving psychology away (pp. 89–103) Montery, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. C., Robins, T. J., & Grimes, J. (1982). Review of research on practicum supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 22,(l), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, M. (1982). Developing helping skills. Melbourne:Shillington House.Google Scholar
Ivey, A. E. (1971). Microcounseling: Innovations in interviewing training. Springfiel IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
Ivey, A. E. (1983). Intentional interviewing and counseling. Montery, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Kagan, N. (1975). Influencing human interaction. Washington, D.C.: American Personnel and Guidance Association.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. M. (1983). Current trends in practicum supervision research. Counselor Education and Supervision, 22, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, J. (1988). Testing the test. Self-report: Can it be of value as an assessment technique? Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. L., & Fuqua, D. R. (1986). The effects of order of stimulus presentation on ratings of counseling performance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, S. M. (1978). The relationship of facilitative functioning to effective peer supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 17, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklare, G., Portes, P., & Splete, H. (1985). Developing questioning effectiveness in counseling. Counselor Education and Supervision, 25, (1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, S. M. (1980). Early training facilitative level as a predictor of practicum performance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 19, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, T. J., & Guinee, J. P. (1990). Generalisability of interpersonal communications rating scale ratings across presentation modes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, (1), 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar