Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T08:37:54.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reliability and Validity of the Professional Counseling Performance Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

J. Brad Shepherd*
Affiliation:
Kent State University, Stark Campus, United States of America. jshepher@kent.edu
Paula J. Britton
Affiliation:
John Carroll University, United States of America.
Victoria E. Kress
Affiliation:
Youngstown State University, United States of America.
*
*Address for Correspondence: J. Brad Shepherd, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, 6000 Frank Avenue, North Canton, OH, USA, 44720.
Get access

Abstract

The definition and measurement of counsellor trainee competency is an issue that has received increased attention yet lacks quantitative study. This research evaluates item responses, scale reliability and intercorrelations, interrater agreement, and criterion-related validity of the Professional Performance Fitness Evaluation/Professional Counseling Performance Evaluation, a measure used by counsellor educators to evaluate professional fitness. The results identified several scale items that were insensitive to substandard skill levels and indicated that university and site supervisors' trainee ratings did not agree. Both site and university supervisors did identify a majority of students demonstrating substandard skills, and when the site and university supervisors' ratings were combined, the supervisors identified 79% of the noncompetent trainees.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)