Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:16:14.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discretion in the accounting for defined benefit obligations – an empirical analysis of German IFRS statements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

MARCUS SALEWSKI  and
HENNING ZÜLCH
MARCUS SALEWSKI
Affiliation:
HHL – Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Chair of Accounting and Auditing; Jahnallee 59, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany (e-mail: marcus.salewski@hhl.de, henning.zuelch@hhl.de)
HENNING ZÜLCH
Affiliation:
HHL – Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Chair of Accounting and Auditing; Jahnallee 59, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany (e-mail: marcus.salewski@hhl.de, henning.zuelch@hhl.de)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following the research approach of Hann et al. (2007), this study investigates how discretion in the determination of the defined benefit obligation (DBO) is perceived by investors using a sample of listed German companies in the period of 2005–2011. For this, actuarial assumptions – discount interest rates, compensation growth rate and projected future pension increases – are replaced by their respective industry medians to obtain that component of the DBO, which can be attributed to discretion. We find that the discretionary component is not value relevant in overall terms, which is in contrast to prior research. We provide an explanation in the country-specific characteristics of Germany. Furthermore, we find weak evidence that the discretionary component is incorporated in investor's equity valuations when pension plans are distinctly underfunded.

Keywords

M41Defined benefit obligationmanagerial discretionpension accountingIAS 19value relevanceGermany
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 266 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, B., Frank, M. M. and Perry, T. (2011) The potential for inflating earnings through the expected rate of return on defined benefit pension plan assets. Accounting Horizons, 25(3): 443–464.Google Scholar
Amir, E., Guan, Y. and Oswald, D. (2010) The effect of pension accounting on corporate pension asset allocation. Review of Accounting Studies, 15: 345–366.Google Scholar
Asthana, S. (2008) Earnings management, expected returns on pension assets, and resource allocation decisions. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 7(2): 199–220.Google Scholar
Barth, M. E. (1991) Relative measurement errors among alternative pension asset and liability measures. The Accounting Review, 66(3): 433–463.Google Scholar
Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H. and Landsman, W. R. (1992) The market valuation implications of net periodic pension cost components. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(1): 27–62.Google Scholar
Beaudoin, C., Chandar, N. and Werner, E. N. (2011) Good disclosure doesn't cure bad accounting – or does it? Evaluating the case for SFAS 158. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 27: 99–111.Google Scholar
Bergstresser, D., Desai, M. and Rauh, J. (2006) Earnings manipulation, pension assumptions, and managerial investment decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1): 157–195.Google Scholar
Bikker, J. A., Broeders, D. W., Hollanders, D. A. and Ponds, E. H. (2012) Pension funds’ asset allocation and participant age: a test of the life-cycle model. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(3): 595–618.Google Scholar
Blankley, A. I. and Swanson, E. P. (1995) A longitudinal study of SFAS No. 87 pension rate assumptions. Accounting Horizons, 9(4): 1–21.Google Scholar
Brown, S., Lo, K. and Lys, T. (1999) Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2: 83–115.Google Scholar
Byrne, A., Clacher, I., Hillier, D. and Hodgson, A. (2013) Assuming the worst: the shifting sands of pension accounting. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 12(2): 190–212.Google Scholar
Chuk, E. C. (2013) Economic consequences of mandated accounting disclosures: evidence from pension accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 88(2): 395–427.Google Scholar
Comprix, J. and Muller, K. A. I. (2011) Pension plan accounting estimates and the freezing of defined benefit pension plans. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51: 115–133.Google Scholar
Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C. and Verdi, R. (2008) Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5): 1085–1142.Google Scholar
Dechow, P. M. and Skinner, D. J. (2000) Earnings management: reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2): 133–168.Google Scholar
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W. and Schrand, C. (2010) Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50: 344–401.Google Scholar
Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund [German pension fund Bund]. (2008) Europa in Zeitreihen 2008 [Europe in time series 2008], available at http://www.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de/nn_15142/SharedDocs/de/Inhalt/04__Formulare__Publikationen/03__publikationen/Statistiken/Broschueren/europa__in__zeitreihen__2008,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/europa_in_zeitreihen_2008.Google Scholar
Dye, R. A. and Verrecchia, R. E. (1995) Discretion vs. uniformity: choices among GAAP. The Accounting Review, 70(3): 389–415.Google Scholar
Ernstberger, J. (2008) The value relevance of comprehensive income under IFRS and US GAAP: empirical evidence from Germany. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 5(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Francis, J. and Smith, M. (2005) A reexamination of the persistence of accruals and cash flows. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3): 413–452.Google Scholar
German Federal Statistical Office. (2007) Statistical Yearbook 2007, available at http://www.bpb.de/files/5Z3DV3.pdf.Google Scholar
German Stock Exchange. (2010) Guide to the equity indices of Deutsche Börse, available at http://deutsche-boerse.com/dbag/dispatch/en/binary/gdb_navigation/overview_pages/dax_overview/kurzinfos/Content_Files/10_aktienindizes/equity_indices_guide.pdf.Google Scholar
Glaum, M. (2009) Pension accounting and research: a review. Accounting and Business Research, 39(3): 273–311.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. H., Goldberg, S. R. and Duchac, J. E. (1996) An empirical analysis of factors associated with changes in pension-plan interest-rate assumptions. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11(2): 305–322.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, V. and Sugrue, T. F. (1995) The determinants of actuarial assumptions under pension accounting disclosures. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 8(1): 35–41.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2003) Econometric Analysis. 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Guay, W. R., Kothari, S. P. and Watts, R. L. (1996) A market-based evaluation of discretionary-accruals models. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(Supplement): 83–105.Google Scholar
Hann, R. N., Lu, Y. Y. and Subramanyam, K. R. (2007) Uniformity versus flexibility: evidence from pricing of the pension obligation. The Accounting Review, 82(1): 107–137.Google Scholar
Healy, P. M. and Palepu, K. G. (1993) The effect of firm's financial disclosure policies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons, 7(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Healy, P. M. and Wahlen, J. M. (1999) A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4): 365–383.Google Scholar
Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E. and Lim, G. C. (2008) Principles of Econometrics. 3rd edn. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hsu, A. W.-h., Wu, C.-F. and Lin, J.-C. (2013) Factors in managing actuarial assumptions for pension fair value: implications for IAS 19. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 16(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. and Zhang, G. (2012) An examination of the incremental usefulness of balance-sheet information beyond earnings in explaining stock returns. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 27(2): 267–293.Google Scholar
International Accounting Standards Board. (2011) IAS 19: Employee Benefits (rev. 2011).Google Scholar
Jones, J. J. (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2): 193–228.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (2008) A Guide to Econometrics. 6th edn. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kothari, S. P. (2001) Capital market research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31: 105–231.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, L. (2010) Finanzmathematik: Lehrbuch der Zins-, Renten-, Tilgungs-, Kurs- und Renditerechnung [Financial mathematics]. 5th edn. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
Landsman, W. R. (1986) An empirical investigation of pension fund property rights. The Accounting Review, 61(4): 622–691.Google Scholar
Leuz, C., Nanda, D. and Wysocki, P. (2003) Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3): 505–527.Google Scholar
Lev, B. (1989) On the usefulness of earnings and earnings research: lessons and directions from two decades of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(Supplement): 153–201.Google Scholar
McNichols, M. F. (2000) Research design issues in earnings management studies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4–5): 313–345.Google Scholar
Meyer-Schell, T. and Zimmermann, J. (2008) Konzeptioneller stillstand in der pensionsbilanzierung: die diskussionspapiere von EFRAG und IASB [Conceptual stagnation in pension accounting: the discussion papers of EFRAG and IASB]. Zeitschrift für internationale und kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung, 07/08: 433–443.Google Scholar
Ohlson, J. A. (1995) Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2): 661–688.Google Scholar
Pellens, B., Sellhorn, T. and Strzyz, A. (2008) Pensionsverpflichtungen nach dem Regierungsentwurf eines BilMoG – Simulation erwarteter Auswirkungen [Pension obligations after the BilMoG government draft – Simulation of expected consequences]. Der Betrieb, 44: 2372–2380.Google Scholar
Phan, H. V. and Hegde, S. P. (2013) Corporate governance and risk taking in pension plans: evidence from defined benefit asset allocations. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(3): 919–946.Google Scholar
Pronobis, P., Schwetzler, B., Sperling, M. O. and Zülch, H. (2009) The development of earnings quality in Germany and its implications for further research: a quantitative empirical analysis of German listed companies between 1997 and 2006. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(1): 434–455.Google Scholar
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. and Jordan, B. D. (2007) Essentials of Corporate Finance. 5th edn. NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Sankar, M. and Subramanyam, K. R. (2001) Reporting discretion and private information communication through earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2): 365–386.Google Scholar
Schipper, K. (1989) Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons, 3(4): 91–102.Google Scholar
Subramanyam, K. R. (1996) The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1–3): 249–281.Google Scholar
Subramanyam, K. R. and Zhang, Y. (2001) Does stock price reflect future service effects not included in the projected benefit obligation as defined in SFAS 87 and SFAS 32?. Working paper, University of Southern California and Columbia University.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1962) The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33: 18.Google Scholar
Vuong, Q. H. (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2): 307–333.Google Scholar
Yu, K. (2013) Does recognition versus disclosure affect value relevance? Evidence from pension accounting. The Accounting Review, 88(3): 1095–1127.Google Scholar
Zülch, H. and Salewski, M. (2012) Bilanzierung von Pensionsverpflichtungen deutscher Unternehmen nach IFRS – Empirische Erkenntnisse für die Jahre 2000 bis 2008 [The accounting for pensions of German companies applying IFRS – empirical insights for the years 2000 to 2008]. Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, 1: 9–17.Google Scholar