Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T14:18:28.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replacement name for Antiquatonia sulcata Cooper, 1957 (Brachiopoda: Productoidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Guang R. Shi
Guang R. Shi*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Antiquatonia sulcata Cooper was described from the Lower Permian Coyote Butte limestone of central Oregon (Cooper, 1957, p. 35, Pl. 5C, figs. 18–22). The name sulcata, however, was previously applied by J. Sowerby (1822, p. 17, Pl. 319, fig. 2) to Productus sulcatus from the Upper Visean of Great Britain, revised by Muir-Wood (1928). The British species has now been considered to be congeneric with Antiquatonia Miloradovich (Sarytcheva and Sokolyskaya, 1952, p. 148; Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960, p. 271; Litvihovich, 1962, p. 250; Zakowa, 1988, p. 57). The two forms are sufficiently different in external features to be separated as two species under Antiquatonia. Antiquatonia sulcata of Cooper consequently becomes a later homonym of A. sulcata (Sowerby). The author has been kindly asked (G. A. Cooper, personal commun.) to offer a replacement name, Antiquatonia cooperi, for Cooper's A. sulcata (non Sowerby). Description and comparison of the Oregon species and its holotype has been provided by Cooper (1957, p. 35).

Type
Taxonomic Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 490
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, G. A. 1957. Permian brachiopods from central Oregon. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 134(12), 79 p.Google Scholar
Litvihovich, N. V. 1962. Carboniferous and Permian deposits of the western part of central Kazakhstan. Material for the Geology of Central Kazakhastan, Vol. 4. Moscow University Press, 389 p.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M. 1928. The British Carboniferous Producti II: Productus (sensu stricto): semireticulatus and longspinus groups. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain (Palaeontology), 3(1), 217 p.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A. 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geological Society of America Memoir Geological Society of America Memoir, 445 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarytcheva, T. G., and Sokolyskaya, A. N. 1952. Key to the Paleozoic brachiopods of the Moscow Basin. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, paleontologicheskego Instituta Trudy, 38:3–303.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1821-1822. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. Vol. 4, 113 p.Google Scholar
Zakowa, H. 1988. Brachiopods of the family Dictyclostidae Stehli 1954 from the Upper Visean strata of Galezice. Biuletyn Instytutu Geologiznego, 358:45–62.Google Scholar