Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:21:39.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative stromatolitology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

H. J. Hofmann
H. J. Hofmann*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Montreal, P.O. Box 6128 Sta. A, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All aspects of stromatolites can be quantified, encompassing morphologic, dimensional, material, and positional attributes. Numerical data obtained by electronic image analysis or otherwise can facilitate taxonomy, classification, and studies of evolutionary tendencies in stromatolites, and bridge the language barriers as well. Consensus on basic attributes for recognizing taxa at different levels of hierarchy still needs to be developed; quantitative data can promote reduction or elimination of disagreements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , July 1994 , pp. 704 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banerjee, D. M., and Chopra, J. 1986. Morphometric analysis of Proterozoic stromatolites from India—preliminary report on testing of a new technique. Precambrian Research, 33:265–282.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. R. 1980. Mathematical representation of stromatolites: a new concept. Geological Survey of India, Miscellaneous Publications, 44:98–104.Google Scholar
Falconer, K. 1990. Fractal Geometry. John Wiley, Chichester, England, 288 p.Google Scholar
Feder, J. 1988. Fractals. Plenum Press, New York, 283 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, K. 1984. Biostratigraphic studies of stromatolites from the Proterozoic Earaheedy Group, Nabberu Basin, Western Australia. Geological Survey of Western Australia, Bulletin 130, 130 p.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1969. Attributes of stromatolites. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 69-39, 58 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1976. Stromatoid morphometrics, p. 45–54. In Walter, M. R. (ed.), Stromatolites. Developments in Sedimentology, 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1977. On Aphebian stromatolites and Riphean stromatolite stratigraphy. Precambrian Research, 5:175–205.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1978. New stromatolites from the Aphebian Mistassini Group, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 15:571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1990. Subdividing the Precambrian—the geon concept. Geology, 18:340–341.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H. J. 1992. New Precambrian time scale: comments. Episodes, 15:122–123.Google Scholar
Komar, V. A., Raaben, M. E., and Semikhatov, M. A. 1965. Konofitony rifeya SSSR i ikh stratigraficheskoe znachenie. Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Geological Institute, Transactions, Volume 131, 73 p.Google Scholar
Leinfelder, R. R., and Hartkopf-Fröder, C. 1990. In situ accretion mechanism of concavo-convex lacustrine oncoids (‘swallow nests’) from the Oligocene of the Main Basin, Rhineland, FRG. Sedimentology, 37:287–301.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1967. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractal dimension. Science, 155:636–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco, 460 p.Google Scholar
Plumb, K. A. 1991. New Precambrian time scale. Episodes, 14:139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, C. H., and Mandelbrot, B. B. (eds.). 1989. Special issue on fractals in geophysics. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 131:1–313.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., and Hofmann, H. J. 1982. Precambrian stromatolites: image analysis of lamina shape. Journal of Geology, 90:253–268.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Jin, L-F., Xiao, SH-H., and Liang, Y-Z. 1993. Image analysis of stromatolite fabric using a spatial frequency power spectrum analysis system. Journal of Geology, 101:591–602.Google Scholar