Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T06:15:29.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The oldest hindiid demosponge from the Darriwilian (Middle Ordovician) of the argentine precordillera: evolutionary implications for the tricranocladines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Marcelo G. Carrera
Marcelo G. Carrera*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones Paleobiológicas (CIPAL) Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sársfield 299 (5000) Córdoba, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The tricranocladine sponges (now assigned to the suborder Eutaxicladina) are a conservative group consisting of the single family Hindiidae. the genus Hindia Duncan is considered the base of the tricranoclad evolutionary record. A new sponge discovered from the Ordovician limestones of the San Juan Formation in the Argentine Precordillera allows a reexamination of the Hindiid lineage and extends the early history of the tricranocladines back to the Darriwilian. Eoscheiella concava n. gen. and sp. is described and illustrated. It is known from a single chertified, spherical specimen with a central hollow core, a typical character found in several genera of the family. Tricranoclads, megarhizoclones, and radial monaxonic spicules are the main skeletal components of the new genus. the presence of a band of subparalell tangential monaxons on the surface of Eoscheiella can be related to an inferred, small, root tuft that attached the spherical sponge to the substrate. the discovery of Eoscheiella modifies the evolutionary view of the family, for it is the oldest genus now known with simple dipodal and tripodal tricranoclads without a brachyome, radial monaxons, and megarhizoclones. Eoscheiella displaces the genus Hindia from the base of tricranocladine evolutionary history. Variability in spicule form, arrangement, and clasping possibilities observed in Permian representatives are clearly more accentuated in the Ordovician Eoscheiella. All these features appeared earlier than expected in previously proposed evolutionary trends.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 754 - 759
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benedetto, J. L. 2003. Brachiopods, p. 187–271. In Benedetto, J. L. (ed.), Ordovician Fossils of Argentina. Secretaria de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Beresi, S., and Rigby, J. K. 1993. The Lower Ordovician sponges of San Juan, Argentina. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 39, 63 p.Google Scholar
Botting, J. P. 2004. An exceptional Caradoc sponge fauna from the Llanfawr quarries, Central Wales and phylogenetic implications. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2:31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cañas, F. L. 1999. Facies and sequences of the Late Cambrian–Early Ordovician carbonates of the Argentine Precordillera: a stratigraphic comparison with Laurentian platforms, p. 43–62. In Ramos, V. A. and Keppie, J. D. (eds.), Laurentia-Gondwana connections before Pangea. Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 336.Google Scholar
Carrera, M. G. 1994. An Ordovician sponge fauna from San Juan Formation, Precordillera Basin, western Argentina. Neues Jahrbüch für Geologie und Paläontologie (Abhandlungen), 191:201–220.Google Scholar
Carrera, M. G. 1996a. Ordovician Megamorinid demosponges from San Juan Formation, Precordillera, western Argentina. Geobios, 29:643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, M. G. 1996b. Nuevos poríferos de la Formación San Juan (Ordovícico), Precordillera Argentina. Ameghiniana, 33:335–342.Google Scholar
Carrera, M. G. 1997. Significado paleoambiental de los porìferos y Briozoos de la Formación San Juan (Ordovícico), Precordillera Argentina. Ameghiniana, 34:179–199.Google Scholar
Carrera, M. G. 2000. Sponge-epizoan interactions in the Early Ordovician limestones of the Argentine Precordillera. Palaios, 15:261–272.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, M. G. 2003. Sponges and bryozoans, p. 155–186. In Benedetto, J. L. (ed.), Ordovician Fossils of Argentina. Secretaria de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.Google Scholar
Carrera, M. G., and Rigby, J. K. 1999. Biogeography of the Ordovician sponges. Journal of Paleontology, 73:26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, M. G., and Rigby, J. K. 2004. Sponges, p. 102–111. In Webby, B. D., Droser, M. L., Paris, F., and Percival, I. G. (eds.), The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, A. 1924. On an orthogenetic series of growth forms in certain tetraxonid sponge spicules. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (section B), 97:243–250.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1879. On some spheroidal lithistid Spongida form the Upper Silurian Formation of new Brunswick. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (series 5), 4:84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finks, R. 1971. A new Permian Eutaxicladine demosponge, mosaic evolution, and the origin of the Dicranocladina. Journal of Paleontology, 45:977–997.Google Scholar
Finks, R., 2003. Paleozoic Demospongea: Morphology and Phylogeny, p. 63–80. In Kaesler, R. and Rigby, J. K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Porifera (revised), 2: Introduction to the Porifera. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Finks, R., and Rigby, J. K. 2004. Paleozoic demosponges, p. 9–74. In Kaesler, R. and Rigby, J. K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E. Porifera (revised), 3: Porifera (Demospongea, Hexactinellida, Heteractinida, Calcarea). Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Furque, G. 1979. Descripción geológica de la Hoja 18c, Jáchal, Provincia de San Juan. Boletín Servicio Geológico Nacional, 164:1–79.Google Scholar
Hunicken, M., and Ortega, G. 1987. Lower Llanvirn-Lower Caradoc (Ordovician) conodonts and graptolites from the Argentine central Precordillera, p. 136–145. In: Austin, R. L. (ed.), Conodonts: Investigative techniques and applications. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. 1953. Sur une nouvelle classification des Démosponges. Académie des Sciences (Paris), Comptes Rendus des Séances 236:853–855.Google Scholar
Mehl-Janussen, D. (1999). Die frühe Evolution der Porifera. Phylogenie und evolutionsokologie der porifera im Paläozoikum mit Schwerpunkt der desmentragenden Demospongiae (“Lithistide”). Münchener Geowissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen. Reihe A. Geologie und Paläeontologie 37,1–72.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1893. Palaeospongiologie, Erster oder allgemeiner Theil, und Zweiter Theil, erste Hälfte. Palaeontographica, 40, 232 p.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1894. Palaeospongiologie, Erster oder allgemeiner Theil, und Zweiter Theil, erste Hälfte. Palaeontographica, 41:233–346.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1968. Microscleres in demosponge classification. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. Paper, 35, 37 p.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 2003. Post-Paleozoic Demospongea, p. 81–112. In Kaesler, R. and Rigby, J. K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. E, Porifera (revised), 2: Introduction to the Porifera. Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1986. Late Devonian sponges of Western Australia. Geological Survey of Western Australia Report, 18, 59 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1991. Evolution of Paleozoic heteractinid calcareous sponges and demosponges: Patterns and records, p. 83–101. In Reitner, J. and Keupp, H. (eds.), Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 2004. Hindia Duncan 1879 (Porifera): Proposed conservation. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 61(2):80–82.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Bayer, T. 1976. Sponges of the Ordovician Maquoketa Formation in Minnesota and Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 45:608–627.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Collins, D. 2004. Sponges of the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale and Stephen formations, British Columbia. Royal Ontario Museum, ROM Contributions in Science, 1, 155 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Webby, B. D. 1988. Late Ordovician sponges from the Malongulli Formation of central New South Wales. Palaeontographica Americana, 56, 147 p.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 427–446. Encyclopedia Britannica, 9th ed. Adam and Charles Black. Edimburgh.Google Scholar
Tschernyschew, T., and Stepanov, P. 1916. Obercarbon fauna von König Oskars und vom Heibergs Land. Report Second Norwegian Arctic Expedition in the “Fram” 1898-1902, 4(34), 67 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 67:261–364.Google Scholar