Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T23:26:58.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Cretaceous and Tertiary Pholadidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

George L. Kennedy
George L. Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Invertebrate Paleontology and Invertebrate Zoology, Santa Barbara Museum of Naturasl History, Santa Barbara, California 93105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cretaceous and early Tertiary Pholadidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Pacific Slope of North America are rare and only poorly known. Three new species, each the earliest known Pacific Slope representative of its respective genus, are described: Barnea (Anchomasa) saulae n. sp. (Pholadinae) from the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian and Santonian) Redding Formation near Redding, uppermost Sacramento Valley, Shasta County, northern California; Chaceia fulcherae n. sp. (Martesiinae) from three widely separated areas of outcrop represented by 1) the middle Miocene (“Temblor”) Temblor Formation near Oil City and in Jasper Canyon, western Fresno County, central California, 2) the middle Miocene (“Temblor”) Topanga(?) Group in the northern Santa Ana Mountains, Orange County, southern California, and 3) the upper Miocene (Wishkahan) Montesano Formation on the Middle Fork of the Satsop River, Mason County, western Washington; and Netastoma squiresi n. sp. (Jouannetiinae) from the lowest Eocene (uppermost “Meganos”) part of the Santa Susana Formation north of Simi Valley in the Santa Susana Mountains, Ventura County, southern California.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , May 1993 , pp. 397 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, W. O. 1966. New Tertiary marine mollusks from Oregon and Washington. Journal of Paleontology, 40:635–646.Google Scholar
Adegoke, O. S. 1966. Silicified sand-pipes belonging to Chaceia(?) (Pholadidae: Martesiinae) from the late Miocene of California. The Veliger, 9:233–235.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. P. 1864. Supplementary report on the present state of our knowledge with regard to the Mollusca of the west coast of America. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science for 1863, p. 517–686. [Reprinted, 1872, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 10(252):1–172.] Google Scholar
Clark, B. L., and Arnold, R. 1923. Fauna of the Sooke Formation, Vancouver Island, with description of a new coral by T. Wayland Vaughan. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 14:123–234.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L., and Woodford, A. O. 1927. The geology and paleontology of the type section of the Meganos Formation (lower middle Eocene) of California. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 17:62–142.Google Scholar
Coan, E. V., and Kennedy, G. L. 1980. Nettastomella Carpenter, 1865 (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pholadidae): proposed conservation under the plenary powers. Z.N. (S.) 1054. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 37:114–116.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1849. Descriptions of new fresh water and marine shells. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 4:152–156.Google Scholar
DesMoulins, C. 1827 [1828]. Description de trois genres nouveaux de coquilles fossiles du terrain tertiaire de Bordeaux. Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, Bulletin d' Histoire Naturelle, 2:226–255 [not seen].Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1967. A re-interpretation of the sand-pipes described by Adegoke. The Veliger, 10:174–175.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils, p. 57–217. In Meek, F. B. and Gabb, W. M., Palaeontology of California. Volume I. Geological Survey of California, Sherman and Company, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1866–1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. Palaeontology of California. Volume II. Geological Survey of California, Sherman and Co., Philadelphia, 299 p.Google Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1851. Descriptions of new shells from California collected by Maj. William Rich and Lieut. T. P. Green, U.S.N. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 4:87–93.Google Scholar
Grant, U. S. IV, and Gale, H. R. 1931. Catalogue of the marine Pliocene and Pleistocene Mollusca of California and adjacent regions. Memoirs of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 1:1–1036.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1842. Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum. Edition 44. London, 308 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
I.C.Z.N. (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature). 1985. Opinion 1296. Request for the use of the plenary powers to conserve Nettastomella Carpenter, 1865 (Bivalvia) refused. The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 42:37–38.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. R. A. 1988. Cretaceous wood-boring bivalves from western Antarctica with a review of the Mesozoic Pholadidae. Palaeontology, 31:341–372.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. R. A., and Bromley, R. G. 1984. Ichnological nomenclature of clavate borings. Palaeontology, 27:793–807.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. L. 1974. West American Cenozoic Pholadidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). San Diego Society of Natural History Memoirs, 8:2–127 + errata sheet.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. L. 1985. The bivalve family Pholadidae in the northeastern and northwestern Pacific: review of nomenclatural problems. Western Society of Malacologists, Annual Report, 17:12–13.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. de. 1809. Philosophic zoologique, ou exposition des considerations relatives à l'histoire naturelle des animaux, la diversité de leur organisation et des facultés qu'ils en obtiennent, aux causes physiques qui maintiennent en eux la vie, et donnent lieu aux mouvements qu'ils exécutent; enfin à celles qui produisent les unes les sentiments, et les autres l'intelligence de ceux qui en sont doués, 2 volumes. Paris, 885 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1852. Molluscorum Britanniae Synopsis: a synopsis of the Mollusca of Great Britain, arranged according to their natural affinities and anatomical structures, edited by Gray, J. E. John van Voorst, London, 376 p. [not seen].Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonyms, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata: Holmiae [Stockholm], 824 p. [Facsimile reprinted 1956, British Museum (Natural History), London.] Google Scholar
Lowe, H. N. 1931. Note on the west coast Zirfaea . The Nautilus, 45:52–53.Google Scholar
Pennant, T. 1776. British Zoology. Volume 4. Cymmorodorion Society, London [not seen].Google Scholar
Popenoe, W. P. 1943. Cretaceous: east side Sacramento Valley, Shasta and Butte Counties, California. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 27:306–312.Google Scholar
Risso, A. 1826. Aperçu sur l'histoire des mollusques qui vivent sur les bords de la Mediterranée boréale et des coquilles, terrestres fluviatiles, et marines, subfossiles, fossiles et petrifiées, qui gisent dans les diverses formations de Alpes Maritimes. Histoire naturelle des principales productions de l'Europe meridionale, 4, 439 p.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1983. Notes on Paleogene turritellas, venericardias, and molluscan stages of the Simi Valley area, California, p. 71–80. In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Volume and Guide Book.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. II. 1849. Monograph of the genus Pholas. Monograph of the genus Triomphalia. Monograph of the genus Xylophaga . Thesaurus Conchyliorum, or figures and descriptions of Recent shells, 2:485–505.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1983. Geologic map of the Simi Valley area, southern California, 1 sheet (scale 1:24,000). In Squires, R. L. and Filewicz, M. V. (eds.), Cenozoic Geology of the Simi Valley Area, Southern California. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Volume and Guide Book.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1988. Geologic age assignments of west coast Eocene marine mollusks, p. 107–112. In Filewicz, M. V. and Squires, R. L. (eds.), Paleogene Stratigraphy, West Coast of North America. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Volume 58.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1952 [1953]. Larger invertebrate fossils of the Woodbine Formation (Cenomanian) of Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 242:1–226.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1870–1871. Cretaceous fauna of southern India. Volume III. The Pelecypoda, with a review of all known genera of this class, fossil and Recent. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologica Indica, series 6, 3:1–222 [1870], i–xxii + 223–538 [1871].Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W. Jr. 1862. On the classification and synonymy of the Recent species of Pholadidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 14:191–221.Google Scholar
Turner, R. D. 1954. The family Pholadidae in the western Atlantic and the eastern Pacific. Part I—Pholadinae. Johnsonia, 3:1–63.Google Scholar
Turner, R. D. 1955. The family Pholadidae in the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific. Part II—Martesiinae, Jouannetiinae and Xylophaginae. Johnsonia, 3:65–160.Google Scholar
Turner, R. D. 1969. Superfamily Pholadacea Lamarck, 1809, p. 702–741. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Mollusca 6, Part N, Bivalvia, Volume 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Valenciennes, A. 1846. Mollusques, 27 pls. [no text]. In Abel DuPetit-Thouars, Voyage autour de monde sur la Frégate La Venus, pendant les années 1836–1839, Atlas de Zoologie. Gide et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1889. Invertebrate fossils from California, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 51:1–102.Google Scholar