Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T02:51:38.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morrowan lithistid demosponges and hexactinellids from the Ozark Mountains of northwestern Arkansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. Keith Rigby  and
Walter L. Manger
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Walter L. Manger
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Silicified and well-preserved specimens of the new orchocladine anthaspidellid genus and species, Virgaspongia ichnata, the rhizomorine haplistiid, Haplistion sphaericum Finks, 1960, and various root tufts, and the new hexactinellid species Steioderma hadra are reported from the Brentwood Member of the Morrowan Bloyd Formation from the Sulphur City quadrangle, in the Ozark Mountains of northwestern Arkansas. Virgaspongia is a subcylindrical branched or unbranched sponge that lacks a spongocoel and has a dendroclone-based skeleton in which trabs diverge upward and outward from an axial region. It is abundant here but is one of only a few anthaspidellid genera known from the Pennsylvanian. This is the first record of Haplistion from Pennsylvanian rocks of Arkansas, although the genus is widespread in upper Paleozoic rocks. The new hexactinellid species, Stioderma hadra, also documents the first occurrence of that genus from Arkansas and in Morrowan rocks. Only fragments were recovered but the swollen grotesque spicules, of several sizes, that make the fused dermal layer and outer sponge wall are distinctive, particularly where combined with an inner layer(?) or root tuft of monaxons of various sizes. Two different root tufts and one demosponge wall fragment(?) also occur in the collection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , July 1994 , pp. 734 - 746
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunikowski, E. 1884. Über Permo-Carbon Schwämme von Sptizbergen. Handlungen Svenska Vetenskaps Akademie, 4:1–18.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region—the siliceous sponges. American Museum of Natural History, Bulletin, 120(1):1–160.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. 1927. Die Spongien aus dem Perm von Timor. Jaarboek van het Mijnwezen Nederland-Oest Indien Verhandelingen fur 1926:99–132.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. 1929. XXVII Die spongien aus dem Perm von Timor. In Wanner, J. (ed.), Paläontologie von Timor, Paläontologie von Timor Nebst Kleineren Beiträgen zur Paläontologie einiger anderen Inseln des ostindischen Archipels, Ergebnisse der Expeditionen G. A. F. Molengraaff, J. Wanner und F. Weber, Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Erwin Nägele) G. M. B. H., 35 p.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1836. Outlines of Comparative Anatomy. H. Bailliere, London, 652 p.Google Scholar
Henbest, L. G. 1953. Morrow Group and Lower Atoka Formation of Arkansas. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 37:1935–1953.Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M. W. 1955. Porifera, p. E21–E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E, Porifera. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Loboziak, S., Conquel, R., and Owens, B. 1984. Les microspores des formations Hale et Bloyd du Nord de l'Arkansas. C. R., Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carboniferè, Champaign-Urbana, 2:385–390.Google Scholar
Manger, W. L., and Sutherland, P. K. 1984. The Mississippian-Pennsylvanian boundary in the southern midcontinent, United States. C. R., Neuvième Congrès International de Stratigraphie et de Géologie du Carbonifère, Champaign-Urbana, 2:369–376.Google Scholar
Mather, K. F. 1915. The fauna of the Morrow Group of Arkansas and Oklahoma. Denison University Scientific Laboratories Bulletin, 18:59–284.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. Class Porifera, p. 152–167. In North American Geology and Paleontology. Privately published by the author, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Nodine-Zeller, D. E. 1977. Microfauna from Chesterian (Mississippian) and Morrowan (Pennsylvanian) rocks in Washington County, Arkansas and Adair and Muskogee Counties, Oklahoma, p. 89–100. In Sutherland, P. K. and Manger, W. L., Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 17.Google Scholar
Pickett, J. 1967. Middle and Upper Palaeozoic sponges from New South Wales. Geological Survey of New South Wales Memoirs, Paleontology 16, 24 p.Google Scholar
Pickett, J., and Rigby, J. K. 1983. Sponges from the Early Devonian Garra Formation, New South Wales. Journal of Paleontology, 57:720–741.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1895. Palaeospongiologie. Zweiter Theil. Fortsetzung. Palaeontographica, 41:347–395.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Chamberlain, C. K., and Black, B. A. 1970. Mississippian and Pennsylvanian sponges from the Ouachita Mountains of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 44:816–832.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1989. Middle Silurian Ludlovian and Wenlockian sponges from Bailie-Hamilton and Cornwallis Islands, Arctic Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 391, 69 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Dixon, O. A. 1979. Sponge fauna of the Upper Silurian Read Bay Formation, Somerset Island, District of Franklin, Arctic Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 53:587–627.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Webby, D. B. 1988. Late Ordovician sponges from the Malongulli Formation of central New South Wales, Australia. Palaeontographica Americana, 56, 146 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongienfauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, 88 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1924. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutchland, III. und letzter Teil. Monographien zur Geologie und Palaeontologie, Berlin, Parts 1,2, 159 p.Google Scholar
Schultze, F. E. 1887. Reports on the Hexactinellida collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during 1873-1876, London, Zoology, 21, 514 p.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 451. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed. Google Scholar
Tschernyschew, T. 1898. Ueber die Artinsk- und Carbon-Schwämme vom Ural und Timan. Academie Sciences St. Petersbourg, Bulletin, Series 6, 9:1–36.Google Scholar
Weller, J. M. 1930. Siliceous sponge spicules of Pennsylvanian age from Illinois and Indiana. Journal of Paelontology, 4:233–251.Google Scholar
Young, J., and Young, J. 1877. On a Carboniferous Hyalonema and other sponges from Ayrshire. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 20:425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Zittel, K. A. 1878. Studien über fossile Spongien, Zweite Abteilung, Lithistidae; Dritte Abteilung, Monactinellidae, Tetractinellidae und Calcispongia. Abhandlungen der Königlich-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematische-Physicalische Klasse, 2:1–138.Google Scholar