Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T22:45:21.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Macropodoids from the Middle Miocene Namba Formation, South Australia, and the homology of some dental structures in kangaroos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Tim Flannery
Affiliation:
The Australian Museum, 6–8 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2000
Thomas H. V. Rich
Affiliation:
Museum of Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3000

Abstract

Macropodoids from the Tarkarooloo local fauna, including Nambaroo tarrinyeri n. gen. and sp., N. saltavus n. sp., N. novus n. sp. and Palaeopotorous priscus n. gen. and sp., include the most plesiomorphic macropodids and potoroids known. Together with the newly discovered macropodoids from the Pinpa and Yanda local faunas they are also the oldest macropodoids described. Study of the morphology of these plesiomorphic macropodoids indicates that the trigonid of the M2 in potoroids and macropodids is composed of different structures (the protoconid and metaconid in macropodids and the protoconid and protostylid in potoroids). Also, the posterior cingulum in macropodids is a neomorphic structure, and not homologous with the posterior cingulum (the posthypocristid and postentocristid) in potoroids and phalangerids. A unique M2 trigonid configuration, where the cristid obliqua connects with the protostylid, is here recognized as being present in plesiomorphic macropodoids and phalangerids, and possibly represents a synapomorphy for a clade containing members of those groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1976. Aboriginal Words of Australia. A. H. and A. W. Reed, Sydney, 144 p.Google Scholar
Archer, M. 1976. Phascolarctid origins and the potential of the selenodont molar in the evolution of diprotodont marsupials. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 17:367371.Google Scholar
Archer, M. 1978. The nature of the molar-premolar boundary in marsupials and a reinterpretation of the homology of marsupial cheek teeth. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 18:157164.Google Scholar
Archer, M. 1979. Wabularoo naughtoni gen. et sp. nov., an enigmatic kangaroo (Marsupialia) from the middle Tertiary Carl Creek Limestone of northwestern Queensland. Results of the Ray E. Lemley Expeditions, part 4. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 19:299307.Google Scholar
Bensley, B. A. 1903. On the evolution of the Australian Marsupialia; with remarks on the relationships of the marsupials in general. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (2, Zoology), 9:83217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkovitz, B. K. B. 1967. The order of cusp development on the molar teeth of Setonix brachyurus (Macropodidae: Marsupialia). Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 50:4148.Google Scholar
Callen, R. A. 1977. Late Cenozoic environments of part of northeastern South Australia. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 24:151169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, R. A. and Tedford, R. H. 1976. New late Cenozoic rock units and depositional environments, Lake Frome area, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 100:125167.Google Scholar
Collett, R. 1877. On a collection of mammals from central and northern Queensland. Zoologica Jahrbücher, 2:829940.Google Scholar
Flannery, T. F. 1983. Review of the subfamily Sthenurinae (Marsupialia) and the relationships of the species of Troposodon and Lagostrophus . Australian Mammalogy, 6:1528.Google Scholar
Flannery, T. F., Archer, M. and Plane, M. 1983. Miocene kangaroos (Macropodidea: Marsupialia) from three localities in northern Australia, with a description of two new subfamilies. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 7:287302.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1821. On the arrangement of vertebrose animals. London Medical Repository, 15:296310.Google Scholar
Kirsch, J. A. W. 1977. A comparative serology of the Marsupialia, and a classification of the marsupials. Australian Journal of Zoology, Supplementary Series No. 52, 152 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. J. 1972. Phylogenetic relationship and classification. Systematic Zoology, 21:227231.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J. 1974. Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships. Systematic Zoology, 22:344359.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. and Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 158:85172.Google Scholar
Remane, A. 1956. Die Gründe des natürlichen systems der vergleichenden Anatomie und Phylogenetik 2. Geest und Portig, Leipzig, 185 p.Google Scholar
Rich, T. H. V. and Rich, P. V. 1982. Search for fossils in New Zealand and Australia. National Geographic Society Research Reports, 14:557568.Google Scholar
Rich, T. H. V. et al. 1982. Australian Tertiary mammal localities, p. 525572. In Rich, P. V. and Thompson, E. M. (eds.), The Fossil Vertebrate Record of Australasia, Monash University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Ride, W. D. L. 1961. The cheek-teeth of Hypsiprymnodon moschatus Ramsay 1876 (Macropodidae: Marsupialia). Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 44:5360.Google Scholar
Tedford, R. H. et al. 1977. The discovery of Miocene vertebrates, Lake Frome area, South Australia. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 2:5357.Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 439 p.Google Scholar
Woodburne, M. O. 1967. The Alcoota fauna, central Australia. An integrated palaeontological and geological study. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia; Geology and Geophysics 87:1187.Google Scholar