Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:55:15.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cranial anatomy and phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic turtle Compsemys victa Leidy, 1856

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Tyler R. Lyson
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, 210 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA, 2Marmarth Research Foundation, Marmarth, North Dakota 58643, USA
Walter G. Joyce
Affiliation:
3Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Sigwartstraße 10, Tübingen 72076, Germany, 4Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, 170 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA

Abstract

The skull of the enigmatic turtle Compsemys victa Leidy, 1856 is described. A number of unique characteristics are apparent, including the extremely thick nature of all cranial bones, the presence of rod-like epipterygoids, placement of the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni halfway along the contact between the pterygoid and basisphenoid, lack of cheek emarginations, and the reduction of the size of the cavum tympani relative to the orbit. Two differing global turtle analyses and one paracryptodiran analysis were performed to determine the phylogenetic placement of C. victa. Both global analyses converged by placing C. victa within Paracryptodira, herein defined as the most inclusive clade that includes Pleurosternon bullockii and Baena arenosa, but no species of living turtle, whereas the paracryptodiran analysis places C. victa outside of Baenoidea, herein defined as the least inclusive clade that contains P. bullockii and B. arenosa. Although a number of similarities are apparent between C. victa and the uncommon, extant testudinoid Platysternon megacephalum, the available data indicate that these similarities are convergent, likely due to their carnivorous diet. Taphonomic evidence reveals that basal paracryptodires, including C. victa, preferred slow moving or ponded water environments. The riverine habitat preference of baenodds must therefore be derived.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibald, J. D. and Hutchison, J. H. 1979. Revision of the genus Palatobaena (Testudines, Baenidae), with the description of a new species. Postilla, 177:119.Google Scholar
Bakker, R. T. 1990. A new baenid turtle from the Morrison Formation, Wyoming. Hunteria, 2:34.Google Scholar
Barley, A. J., Spinks, P. Q., Thomson, R. C., and Shaffer, H. B. 2010. Fourteen nuclear genes provide phylogenetic resolution for difficult nodes in the turtle tree of life. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 55:11891195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, W. S. 1980. Early Cenozoic reptiles and birds from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology, 24:7379.Google Scholar
Batsch, A. J. G. C. 1788. Versuch einer Anleitung, zur Kenntniß und Geschichte der Thiere und Mineralien. Akademische Buchhandlung, Jena, 528 p.Google Scholar
Baur, G. 1887. Osteologische Notizen über Reptilien (Fortsetzung II). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 10:241268.Google Scholar
Bluemle, J. 1977. Surface geology of North Dakota. North Dakota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map 18.Google Scholar
Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics, 10:295304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkman, D. B. 2003a. A review of nonmarine turtles from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40:557571.Google Scholar
Brinkman, D. B. 2003b. Anatomy and systematics of Plesiobaena antiqua (Testudines: Baenidae) from the mid-Campanian Judith River Group of Alberta, Canada. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23:146155.Google Scholar
Brinkman, D. B. and Nicholls, E. L. 1993. The skull of Neurankylus eximius (Testudines: Baenidae) and a reinterpretation of the relationships of this taxon. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 13:273281.Google Scholar
Brinkman, D. B. and Rodriguez de la Rosa, R. 2006. Non-marine turtles from the Cerro del Pueblo Formation (Campanian). New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 35:229233.Google Scholar
Brinkman, D. B., Stadtman, K., and Smith, D. 2000. New material of Dinochelys whitei Gaffney, 1979, from the Dry Mesa Quarry (Morrison Formation, Jurassic) of Colorado. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20:269274.Google Scholar
Broin, F. de. 1977. Contribution a l'etude des cheloniens continentaux du Tertiaire de France. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, N. Serc. C., 38:1423.Google Scholar
Carrano, M. T. and Velez-Juarbe, J. 2006. Paleoecology of the Quarry 9 vertebrate assemblage from Como Bluff, Wyoming (Morrison Formation, Late Jurassic). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 237:147159.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1868. On the origin of genera. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 20:242300.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1877. On reptilian remains from the Dakota beds of Colorado. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 17:193196.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1882. Contributions to the history of the Vertebrata of the Lower Eocene of Wyoming and New Mexico, made during 1881. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 20:139197.Google Scholar
Danilov, I. G. and Parham, J. F. 2006. A redescription of ‘Plesiochelys’ tatsuensis from the Late Jurassic of China, with comments on the antiquity of the crown clade Cryptodira. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26:573580.Google Scholar
Ernst, C. H., and Barbour, R. W. 1989. Turtles of the World. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., 290 p.Google Scholar
Estes, R. 1976. Middle Paleocene lower vertebrates from the Tongue River Formation, southeastern Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 50:500520.Google Scholar
Evans, J. and Kemp, T. S. 1975. The cranial morphology of a new lower Cretaceous turtle from southern England. Palaeotology, 18:2540.Google Scholar
Evans, J. and Kemp, T. S. 1976. A new turtle skull from the Purbeckian of England and a note on the early dichotomies of cryptodire turtles. Palaeontology, 19:317324.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39:783791.Google Scholar
Foster, J. R. 2003. Paleoecological analysis of the vertebrate fauna of the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic), Rocky Mountain Region. U.S.A. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 23:185.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1972. The systematics of the North American family Baenidae (Reptilia, Cryptodira). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 147:241320.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1975. A phylogeny and classification of the higher categories of turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 155:387436.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1979a. The Jurassic turtles of North America. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 162:93135.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1979b. Comparative cranial morphology of recent and fossil turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 164:65375.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1984. Historical analysis of theories of chelonian relationships. Systematic Zoology, 33:283301.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1990. The comparative osteology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys . Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 194:1263.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. 1996. The postcranial morphology of Meiolania platyceps and a review of the Meiolaniidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 229:1166.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. and Hiatt, R. 1971. A new baenid turtle from the Upper Cretaceous of Montana. American Museum of Natural History Novitates, 2443:19.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., Hutchison, J. H., Jenkins, F. A. Jr., and Meeker, L. J. 1987. Modern turtle origins: The oldest known cryptodire. Science, 237:289291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaffney, E. S., Meylan, P. A., and Wyss, A. R. 1991. A computer assisted analysis of the relationships of the higher categories of turtles. Cladistics, 7:313335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. and Meylan, P. A. 1992. The Transylvanian turtle, Kallokibotion, a primitive cryptodire of Cretaceous age. American Museum Novitates, 3040:137.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S., Rich, T. H., Vickers-Rich, P., Constantine, A., Vacca, R., and Kool, L. 2007. Chubutemys, a new Eucryptodiran turtle from the Early Cretaceous of Argentina, and the relationships of the Meiolaniidae. American Museum of Natural History Novitates, 3599:135.Google Scholar
Gaffney, E. S. and Jenkins, F. A. Jr. 2010. The cranial morphology of Kayentachelys, an Early Jurassic crptodire, and the early history of turtles. Acta Zoologica, 91:335368.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1916. Vertebrate faunas of the Ojo Alamo, Kirtland and Fruitland formations. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 98Q, p. 279308.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1919. Reptilian faunas of the Torrejon, Puerco, and underlying Upper Cretaceous formations of San Juan County, New Mexico. United States Geological Survey Professional Papers, 119:168.Google Scholar
Gilmore, C. W. 1935. On the Reptilia of the Kirtland Formation of New Mexico, with descriptions of new species of fossil turtles. Proceedings U.S. National Museum, 83:159188.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1831. Synopsis Reptilium, Pt. 1, Cataphracta. Tortoises, Crocodiles, Enaliosaurians. Treuttel, Wurtz, London, 85 p.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1904. On some fossil turtles belonging to the Marsh collection in Yale University Museum. American Journal of Science, 18:261276.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1908. The fossil turtles of North America. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, 75:1568.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. 1910. Descriptions of eight new species of fossil turtles from west of the one hundredth meridian. Proceedings of U.S. National Museum, 38:307326.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M. and Bull, J. J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology, 42:182192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirayama, R., Brinkman, D. B., and Danilov, I. G. 2000. Distribution and biogeography of non-marine Cretaceous turtles. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 7:181198.Google Scholar
Holroyd, P. and Hutchison, J. H. 2002. Patterns of geographic variation in latest Cretaceous vertebrates: evidence from the turtle component, p. 177190. In Hartman, J.H., Johnson, K. R., and Nichols, D. J. (eds.), The Hell Creek Formation and Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in the Great Plains: An Integrated Continental Record of the End of the Cretaceous. The Geological Society of America, Special Paper 361.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. and Archibald, J. D. 1986. Diversity of turtles across the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary in northeastern Montana. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 55:122.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H., Eaton, J. H., Holroyd, P.A., and Goodwin, M. B. 1998. Larger vertebrates of the Kaiparowits Formation (Campanian) in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument and Adjacent Areas. p. 391398. In Hill, L. M. and Koselak, J. J. (eds.), Learning from the Land. Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Science Symposium Proceedings, U.S. Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. H. and Holroyd, P. A. 2003. Late Cretaceous and early Paleocene turtles of the Denver Basin, Colorado. Rocky Mountain Geology, 38:121142.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of Mesozoic turtles. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 48:3102.Google Scholar
Joyce, W.G., Chapman, S. D., Moody, R. T. J., and Walker, C. A. In Press. The skull of the solemydid turtle Helochelydra nopscai from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Sussex Formation of the Isle of Wight, England. Special Papers in Paleontology.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G., Parham, J. F., and Gauthier, J. A. 2004. Developing a protocol for the conversion of rank-based taxon names to phylogenetically defined clade names, as exemplified by turtles. Journal of Paleontology, 78:9891013.Google Scholar
Joyce, W. G. and Lyson, T. R. 2010. Pangshura tatrotia, a new species of pond turtle (Testudinoidea) from the Pliocene Siwaliks of Pakistan. Journal of Systematic Paleontology, 8:449458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, W. G. and Lyson, T. R. 2011. New material of Gilmoremys lancensis nov. comb. (Testudines: Trionychidae) from the Hell Creek Formation and the diagnosis of plastomenid turtles. Journal of Paleontology, 85:444461.Google Scholar
Lambe, L. M. 1902. New genera and species from the Belly River Series (Mid-Cretaceous). Contributions to Canadian Palaeontology, 3:2381.Google Scholar
Lambe, L. M. 1906. Description of new species of Testudo and Baena with remarks on some Cretaceous forms. Ottawa Naturalist, 19:187196.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1856. Notices of extinct Vertebrata discovered by Dr. F. V. Hayden, during the expedition to the Sioux country under command of Lieut. G. K. Warren. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings, 8:311312.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1870. Description of Emys jeanesi n. sp., Emys haydeni n. sp., Baena arenosa n. g. n. sp., and Saniwa ensidens n. g. n. sp. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1870:123124.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1872. Remarks on some extinct vertebrates. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 24:3840.Google Scholar
Lipka, T. R., Therrien, F., Weishampel, D. B., Jamniczky, H. A., Joyce, W. G., Colbert, M. W., and Brinkman, D. B. 2006. A new turtle from the Arundel Clay facies (Potomac Formation, Early Cretaceous) of Maryland, U.S.A. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20:300307.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. 1889. Catalogue of the Fossil Reptilia and Amphibia in the British Museum (Natural History) Part III. The Order Chelonia. British Museum (Natural History), London, 239 p.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2009a. A new species of Palatobaena (Testudines: Baenidae) and a maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Baenidae. Journal of Paleontology, 83:457470.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2009b. A revision of Plesiobaena (Testudines: Baenidae) and an assessment of baenid ecology across the K/T boundary. Journal of Paleontology, 83:833853.Google Scholar
Lyson, T. R. and Joyce, W. G. 2010. A new baenid turtle from the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Hell Creek Formation of North Dakota and a preliminary taxonomic review of Cretaceous Baenidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 30:394402.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. A. 1833. The Geology of the South East of England. Longman, London, 415 p.Google Scholar
Marsh, O. C. 1890. Notice of some extinct Testudinata. American Journal of Science, 40:177179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, H. vom. 1855. Helochelys Danubina, aus dem Grünsande von Kelheim in Bayern. Palaeontographica, 4:96105.Google Scholar
Mlynarski, M. 1976. Testudines. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie, Number 7, 130 p.Google Scholar
Nixon, K. C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics, 15:407414.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1842. Report on British fossil reptiles. Part II. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 11:60204.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1886. Description of fossil remains of two species of a Megalania genus (Meiolania, Ow.), from Lord Howe's Island. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 40:315316.Google Scholar
Parham, J. F., Feldman, C. R., and Boore, J. L. 2006. The complete mitochondrial genome of the enigmatic bigheaded turtle (Platysternon): Description of unusual genomic features and the reconciliation of phylogenetic hypotheses based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 6:111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richmond, D. R. and Morris, T. H. 1998. Stratigraphy and cataclysmic deposition of the Dry Mesa Dinosaur Quarry, Mesa County, Colorado. Modern Geology, 22:121143.Google Scholar
Sterli, J. and Joyce, W. G. 2007. The cranial anatomy of the Early Jurassic turtle Kayentachelys aprix . Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 52:675694.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10 Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Wegner, T. 1911. Desmemys bertelsmeanni n.g. n.sp. Ein Beitrag sur Kenntnis der Thalassemydidae Rütimeyer. Palaeontographica, 58:105132.Google Scholar
Williams, E. E. 1950. Variation and selection in the cervical central articulations of living turtles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 94:511561.Google Scholar