Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:50:10.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cambrian–Ordovician boundary interval extinctions: implications of revised trilobite and brachiopod data from Mount Wilson, Alberta, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

James D. Loch ,
James H. Stitt  and
James R. Derby
James D. Loch
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia 65211
James H. Stitt
Affiliation:
1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia 65211
James R. Derby
Affiliation:
2Geological Consultant, P.O. Box 35306, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74153
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The type section of the Basal Silty Member of the Survey Peak Formation spans the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary (North American usage) at Mount Wilson in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. The zonal and subzonal terminology through the boundary interval developed in Texas and Oklahoma is applicable to the trilobite faunas recovered from the section. The oldest trilobites recovered in this study occur in the top of the underlying Mistaya Formation and are assigned to the Saukiella serotina Subzone of the Upper Cambrian Saukia Zone. Trilobites and brachiopods of the S. serotina and Eurekia apopsis Subzones of the Saukia Zone occur in the lower half of the Basal Silty Member; trilobites and brachiopods assigned to the Lower Ordovician Missisquoia Zone and the Symphysurina brevispicata Subzone of the Symphysurina Zone occur in the upper half of the Basal Silty Member. The S. brevispicata Subzone extends an unknown distance into the Putty Shale Member of the Survey Peak Formation.

The extinction horizons at the base of the Eurekia apopsis Subzone and at the base of the Missisquoia depressa Subzone (the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary) occur within the Basal Silty Member of the Survey Peak Formation, not at the formational contact with the underlying Mistaya Formation. This leaves hypotheses linking immigration of the replacement trilobite faunas to major lithofacies changes through the boundary interval as untenable. Critical review of the evidence for the extinctions at the end of the Ptychaspid Biomere suggests that they were caused by an invasion of the shelf region by cold, anoxic water.

Forty-seven taxa are illustrated and 18 of those which provide new taxonomic information are discussed. One new genus, Rampartaspis Loch, is described in addition to four new species: Eurekia plectocanthus Loch, Highgatella wilsoni Derby, Macronoda punctata Derby, and Rampartaspis dissimulosulcus Loch. The identifications of trilobites and brachiopods in this paper revise those of Aitken and Norford (1967) and Derby et al. (1972) and result in minor changes in the reported positions of the bases of the Missisquoia and Symphysurina Zones. Revision of the identification of some trilobites in Dean (1989) changes the biostratigraphic interpretation of the Basal Silty Member at Wilcox Pass, Albert, Canada.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , July 1993 , pp. 497 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, J. D. 1966. Middle Cambrian to Middle Ordovician cyclic sedimentation, southern Rocky Mountains of Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 14:405–441.Google Scholar
Aitken, J. D., and Norford, B. S. 1967. Lower Ordovician Survey Peak and Outram Formations, southern Rocky Mountains of Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 15:150–207.Google Scholar
Angelin, N. P. 1851–78. Palaeontologica Scandinavica. Academiae Regiae Scientarum Suecanae (Holmiae). Pars I. Crustaacea formationis transitionis, p. 1–24 (1851); Pars II. p. i–ix, 21–92 (1854); republished in combined and revised form. [Lindstrom, G. (ed.)], p. x + 96 (1878).Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1860. On some new species of fossils from the Limestone near Point Levis opposite Quebec. Canadian Naturalist, 5:301–324.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1865. Paleozoic fossils, Volume 1. Containing descriptions and figures of new or little known species of organic remains from the Silurian rocks. Geological Survey Canada (Montreal), 426 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, J. 1930 [1931]. Geology of the Eminence and Cardareva Quadrangles. Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, 2nd ser., 24, 228 p. [This publication is dated 1930, but according to Knight, 1941, Geological Society of America Special Paper 32, p. 403, it was issued in 1931.] Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt: etc. Berlin, 147 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. H. 1924. The paleontology of the Beekmantown series at Levis, Quebec. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 10:1–134.Google Scholar
Cook, H. E., Taylor, M. E., and Egbert, R. M. 1981. Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician biostratigraphy and depositional environments, Tybo Canyon, Hot Creek Range, Nevada, p. 52–64. In Taylor, M. E. and Palmer, A. R. (eds.), Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Great Basin and Vicinity, Western United States. Guidebook for Field Trip 1, Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Cook, H. E., Taylor, M. E., and Miller, J. F. 1989. Day Two: Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and depositional environments, Hot Creek Range, Nevada, p. 28–36. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Cambrian and Early Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Basin and Range Province, Western United States. Field Trip Guidebook T125 of the 28th International Geological Congress. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1977. The Early Ordovician trilobite genus Missisquoia Shaw 1951 in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains of Alberta and British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada Paper, 76-33, 7 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1978. Preliminary account of the trilobite biostratigraphy of the Survey Peak and Outram Formations (Late Cambrian, Early Ordovician) at Wilcox Pass, southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Geological Survey of Canada Paper, 76-34, 10 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1989 [1990]. Trilobites from the Survey Peak, Outram and Skoki Formations (Upper Cambrian–Lower Ordovician) at Wilcox Pass, Jasper National Park, Alberta. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 389, 141 p. [Actually issued in 1990 with 1989 cover date, B. S. Norford, personal commun.] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derby, J. R., Lane, H. R., and Norford, B. S. 1972. Uppermost Cambrian–basal Ordovician faunal succession in Alberta and correlation with similar sequences in the western United States. 24th International Geological Congress, Section 7, Paleontology:503–512.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1983. Cambrian–Ordovician trilobites from the boundary beds in western Newfoundland and their phylogenetic significance. Special Papers in Paleontology, 30:179–211.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Skevington, D. 1980. Correlation of Cambrian–Ordovician boundary between Europe and North America: new data from western Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 17:382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, R. A., Landing, E., and Skevington, D. 1982. Cambrian–Ordovician boundary sections in the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, p. 95–129. In Bassett, M. G. and Dean, W. T. (eds.), The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions and Correlations. National Museum of Wales, Geology Series No. 3, Cardiff, Wales.Google Scholar
Grimm, K. A., Miller, J. F., and Taylor, J. F. 1985. Sedimentation and diagenesis at a Late Cambrian biomere extinction horizon. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 17:598.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., et al. 1959. General description of Trilobita, p. O38–O126. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H. H. (ed.). 1976. International Stratigraphic Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 200 p.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae. With description of Norwegian material and remarks on the Olenid and Tremadocian Series. Skrifter Utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-akademi i Oslo, 303 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1952. [1953]. Lower Ordovician trilobites from western Utah and eastern Nevada. Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey, Bulletin 48, 249 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F., Taylor, M. E., and Miller, J. F. 1988. Upper Cambrian–Lower Ordovician Notch Peak Formation in western Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1393, 30 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P. 1955. Classification de trilobites. Annales de Paléontologie, 41:91–325.Google Scholar
Jaekal, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift Deutsche Geologische Gesellschaft, 16:380–401.Google Scholar
Kindle, C. H. 1929. An “Ozarkian” fauna from Jasper Park, Alberta. The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 43:144–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935. The Briscoia fauna of the late Upper Cambrian in Alaska with descriptions of a few Upper Cambrian trilobites from Montana and Nevada. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, 12:39–57.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1955. The Ordovician fossils from the McKay Group in British Columbia, western Canada, with a note on the Early Ordovician paleogeography. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, sec. 2, 9:355–493.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1964a. Upper Cambrian faunas from the subsurface Deadwood Formation, Williston Basin, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 38:33–60.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1964b. Basal Ordovician faunas from the Williston Basin, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 38:453–476.Google Scholar
Longacre, S. A. 1970. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Ptychaspid Biomere, Wilberns Formation, central Texas. Paleontological Society Memoir 4 (Journal of Paleontology, 44(1): Supplement), 70 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R. 1982. Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobite biostratigraphy of the Rabbitkettle Formation, western District of Mackenzie. Royal Ontario Museum, Life Sciences Contributions 134, 187 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R. and Westrop, S. R. 1983. Trilobite biofacies in the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary interval in northern North America. Alcheringa, 7:301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., Westrop, S. R., and Kindle, C. H. 1989. Sunwaptan (Upper Cambrian) Trilobites of the Cow Head Group, Western Newfoundland, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana no. 6, 175 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., Westrop, S. R., Pratt, B. R., Tuffnell, P. A., and Young, G. A. 1986. Paleoscene #3. Dual biostratigraphy: zones and biofacies. Geoscience Canada, 13:139–154.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1887. On the Cambrian faunas of Cape Breton and Newfoundland. Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 4:147–157.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1978. Upper Cambrian and lowest Ordovician conodont faunas of the House Range, Utah, p. 1–33. In Miller, J. F. (ed.), Upper Cambrian to Middle Ordovician Conodont Faunas of Western Utah. Southwest Missouri State University Geoscience Series no. 5.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1984. Cambrian and earliest Ordovician conodont evolution, biofacies, and provincialism, p. 43–68. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opik, A. A. 1966. The Early Upper Cambrian crisis and its correlation. Royal Society of New South Wales, Journal and Proceedings, 100:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orndorff, R. C., Taylor, J. F., and Traut, R. W. 1988. Uppermost Cambrian and lowermost Ordovician conodont and trilobite biostratigraphy in northwestern Virginia. Virginia Minerals, 34:13–20.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1960. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Dunderberg Shale Eureka District, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 334-C:53–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1965. Biomere—a new kind of biostratigraphic unit. Journal of Paleontology, 39:149–153.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1965b. Trilobites of the Late Cambrian Pterocephaliid biomere in the Great Basin, United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 493, 105 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1972. Problems of Cambrian biogeography. 24th International Geological Congress, Section 7, Paleontology:310–315.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1974. Search for the Cambrian world. American Scientist, 62:216–224.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1979. Biomere boundaries re-examined. Alcheringa, 3:33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1984. The biomere problem: the evolution of an idea. Journal of Paleontology, 58:599–611.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C. 1937. On the Lower Ordovician faunas of east Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland, 19:1–72.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1945. New Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Levis conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 19:462–478.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1959. Trempealeauian trilobites from the Conococheague, Frederick and Grove limestones of the central Appalachians. Journal of Paleontology, 33:375–398.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1963. Additions to the Upper Cambrian fauna from the conglomerate boulders at Levis, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 37:1009–1017.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1913. A revision of the species which have been referred to the genus Bathyurus . Victoria Memorial Museum Bulletin, 1:51–69.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, 37:389–466.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1925. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Vermont Geological Society, 14th Annual Report:137–203.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1938. Fourth contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian fossils. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 95:1–43.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1942. New Upper Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 103:1–136.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1976. Middle Cambrian trilobite biostratigraphy of the Great Basin. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 23:93–109.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in northeastern Utah, and its trilobite faunas. Yale University Peabody Museum Natural History Bulletin, 6:1–161.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J., Jr. et al. (27 coauthors). 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. International Union of Geological Sciences Publication 12, 73 p.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1951. The paleontology of northwestern Vermont, Part I. New Late Cambrian trilobites. Journal of Paleontology, 25:97–114.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1955. The paleontology of northwestern Vermont, Part IV. A new trilobite genus. Journal of Paleontology, 29:187.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1964. Time in Stratigraphy. McGraw-Hill, New York, 71 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1971. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Timbered Hills and Lower Arbuckle Groups, western Arbuckle Mountains, Murray County, Oklahoma, Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 110, 83 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1975. Adaptive radiation, trilobite paleoecology, and extinction, Ptychaspid biomere, late Cambrian of Oklahoma. Fossils and Strata, 4:381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Wichita Mountains area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 124, 79 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1983. Trilobites, biostratigraphy, and lithostratigraphy of the McKenzie Hill Limestone (Lower Ordovician), Wichita and Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 124, 54 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H., and Miller, J. F. 1987. Jujuyaspis borealis and associated trilobites and conodonts from the Lower Ordovician of Texas and Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 61:112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H. 1915. Suggestions for a revised classification of trilobites. Geological Magazine, new series, 2:407–496, 538–545.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. F. 1984. Biostratigraphy and lithostratigraphy of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary interval, Texas and Oklahoma. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, 206 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. 1971. Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cambrian (Upper Franconian–Trempealeauan Stages) in the central Great Basin, Nevada and Utah. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 428 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. 1976. Indigenous and redeposited trilobites from Late Cambrian basinal environments of central Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 50:668–700.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. 1985a. Early Ordovician hiatus in the Bear River Range and vicinity, Utah–Idaho—Implications for regional geologic and paleobiologic history. Utah Geological Association, Abstracts for 1985 Field Conference and Symposium, Ogden, Utah: 12.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. 1985b. Late Cambrian trilobite mass extinction coincident with oxygen depletion of outer shelf benthic habitats in central Nevada. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 1985 Midyear Meeting (Golden, Colorado), Abstracts, 2:88–89.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E., and Cook, H. E. 1976. Continental shelf and slope facies in the Upper Cambrian and lowest Ordovician of Nevada, p. 181–214. In Robison, R. A. and Rowell, A. J. (eds.), Paleontology and Depositional Environments: Cambrian of Western North America. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 23, Part 2.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. and Halley, R. B. 1974. Systematics, environment, and biogeography of some Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites from eastern New York State. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 834, 38 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. E., and Landing, E. 1982. Biostratigraphy of the Cambrian–Ordovician transition in the Bear River Range, Utah and Idaho, western United States, p. 181–191. In Bassett, M. G. and Dean, W. T. (eds.), The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions and Correlations. National Museum of Wales, Geology Series No. 3, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E., Cook, H. E., and Miller, J. F. 1989. Day three: Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician biostratigraphy of the Whipple Cave Formation and House Limestone, central Egan Range, Nevada, p. 37–44. In Taylor, M. E. (ed.), Cambrian and Early Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Basin and Range Province, Western United States. Field Trip Guidebook T125 of the 28th International Geological Congress. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E., and Repetski, J. E. 1985. Early Ordovician eustatic sea-level changes in northern Utah and southeastern Idaho, p. 237–247. In Kerns, G. J. (ed.), Orogenic Patterns and Stratigraphy of North-Central Utah and Southeastern Idaho. Utah Geological Association Publication 14.Google Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1880. Agnostus—arterna i de Kambriska afflagringarne vid Andrarum. Sveriges Geogiska Undersökning [C], 42:1–37.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. Paleontology of the Eureka district. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 8, 298 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1890. Descriptions of new forms of Upper Cambrian fossils. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 13:267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1914. The Cambrian faunas of eastern Asia. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 64:1–75.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1916. Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 64:157–258.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1924. Geological formations of the Beaverfoot–Brisco–Stanford Range, British Columbia, Canada. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 75:1–52.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1925. Cambrian geology and paleontology, V. Cambrian and lower Ozarkian trilobites, no. 3. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 75:61–146.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1986. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Sunwaptan Stage, southern Canadian Rocky Mountains, Alberta. Palaeontographica Canadiana no. 3, 179 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1989a. Macroevolutionary implications of mass extinction—evidence from an Upper Cambrian stage boundary. Paleobiology, 15:46–52.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1989b. Facies anatomy of an Upper Cambrian grand cycle: Bison Creek and Mistaya Formations, southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 26:2292–2304.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D., and Ludvigsen, R. 1986. Type species of the Ibexian trilobite Corbinia Walcott, 1924. Journal of Paleontology, 60:68–75.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D., and Ludvigsen, R. 1987. Biogeographic control of trilobite mass extinction at an Upper Cambrian “biomere” boundary. Paleobiology, 13:84–99.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of Northeastern Australia. Queensland Museum Memoirs, 11:59–112.Google Scholar
Winston, D., and Nicholls, H. 1967. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician faunas from the Wilberns Formation of central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 41:66–96.Google Scholar
Wright, J., Miller, J. F., and Holser, W. T. 1987. Conodont chemostratigraphy across the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary: western USA and southeastern China, p. 256–283. In Austin, R. L. (ed.), Conodonts: Investigative Techniques and Applications. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England.Google Scholar