Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mississippian Rugose Corals from Alabama: A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Sergio Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geociencias (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Dpto. de Paleontología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid c/ José Antonio Novais 2, 28040-Madrid, Spain, <sergrodr@geo.ucm.es>
David C. Kopaska-Merkel
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Alabama, Box 869999, Tuscaloosa, AL 35486, USA, <davidkm@gsa.state.al.us>
Corresponding

Abstract

The Mississippian rugose corals from Alabama housed in several museums in that state are revised on the basis of current knowledge of this subclass. Fifteen species belonging to 10 genera have been identified; three species are new, including Zaphrentites lacefieldi, Palastraea cullmanense, and Siphonophyllia alabamaense. Four coral assemblages characterize four stratigraphic subdivisions of the Mississippian in Alabama: Osagean, Meramecian, lower Chesterian, and upper Chesterian. Corals are abundant in some units but diversity is quite low in all assemblages. The level of endemism is very high, except for the lower Chesterian assemblage, which contains some western Paleotethyan forms. Two possible coral evolutionary lineages have been identified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Andronaco, P. 1986. Lithofacies, depositional environments, and cyclicity of the Bangor Limestone in Blount County, north-central Alabama. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Alabama, 250 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Smith, D. P. 1982. New evidence for the early life history of solitary rugose corals. Journal of Paleontology, 56:1,2231,229.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1937. The Paleozoic rugose coral family Paleocyclidae. Journal of Paleontology, 11:189201.Google Scholar
Bat, D. T. 1987. A subsurface facies analysis of the distribution, depositional environments, and diagenetic overprint of the Evans and Lewis sandstone units in north Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Oklahoma, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 225 p.Google Scholar
Blakey, R. C. 2007. North American paleogeographic maps. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/rcb7/nam.html.Google Scholar
Butts, C. 1917. Description and correlation of the Mississippian formations of western Kentucky. Kentucky Geological Survey, 119 p.Google Scholar
Butts, C. 1922. The Mississippian series of eastern Kentucky. Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 5:1188.Google Scholar
Butts, C. 1926. Geology of Alabama: the Paleozoic rocks. Alabama Geological Survey Special Reports, 14:41230.Google Scholar
Butts, C. 1929. Some issues in Chester stratigraphy in Kentucky and Illinois. Journal of Geology, 37:3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, R. G. 1910. Evolution of Zaphrentis delanouei . Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 66:523538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelnau, F. C. de. 1843. Essai sur le système silurien de l'Amerique septentrionale. Paris, 56 p.Google Scholar
Cotton, G. (ed.). 1984. The Revised Rugose Coral Genera. Kiddermister, 283 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1849. Note sur les polypiers fossils. Victor Masson, Paris, 12 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1850. Podrome de paleontology stratigraphique universelle des animaux mollusques et rayonnés, etc. Victor Masson, Paris, 394 p.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1852. Cours élémentaire de paleontology et de géologie stratigraphique. Victor Masson, Paris, 382 p.Google Scholar
Dybowski, W. N. 1873. Beschreibung einiger neuen oder wenig bekennten Arten der Zoantharia rugosa aus der Kohlenformation Russlands. Zapadnogo Imperialnogo Minerali ob-va, 8:102116.Google Scholar
Easton, W. M. 1943. Revision of Campophyllum in North America. Journal of Paleontology, 18:119132.Google Scholar
Easton, W. M. 1944. New Chester corals from Alabama and Tennessee. Journal of Paleontology, 17:276280.Google Scholar
Easton, W. M. 1945. Kinkaid corals from Illinois. Journal of Paleontology, 19:383389.Google Scholar
Easton, W. M. 1957. On the tetracoral Lithostrotion harmodites Milne-Edwards and Haime. Journal of Paleontology, 31:616622.Google Scholar
Easton, W. M. 1973. On the tetracorals Acrocyathus and Lithostrotionella and their septal morphology. Journal of Paleontology, 47:121135.Google Scholar
Ehlers, G. M. and Stumm, E. C. 1953. A new species of the tetracoral genus Palastraea from the Mississippian of Kentucky. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, 38:383387.Google Scholar
Fedorowski, J. 1981. Carboniferous corals: distribution and sequence. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 26:87160.Google Scholar
Fedorowski, J. 1987. Upper Palaeozoic rugose corals from southwestern Texas and adjacent areas. Gaptank and Wolfcampian corals. Part 1. Palaeontologia Polonica, 48:1271.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1830. Oryctographie du gouvernement de Moscou. Moscow, 28 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. R. 1987. Regional diagenesis of the Tuscumbia Limestone (Meramecian-Mississippian) in northern Alabama and northeastern Mississippi. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 218 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. 1828. A history of British animals. Beel and Bradfute, Edinburgh, 565 p.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1922. Palaeozoic corals of China. Part 1. Tetraseptata. Palaeontologica Sinica Series B, 2:176.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. 1928. Palaeozoic corals of China. Part I. Tetraseptata II. Palaeontologica Sinica, 2:1175.Google Scholar
Greene, G. K. 1904. Contribution to Indiana Palaeontology, 17:168175.Google Scholar
Grove, B. H. 1935. Studies in Paleozoic corals, Hl-a revision of some Mississippian Zaphrentids. American Midland Naturalist, 16:337378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. and Whitney, J. D. 1858. Report on the geological survey of the State of Iowa, embracing the results of investigations made during 1855, 1856 and 1857, 4 p.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1938–1940. A monograph on the Carboniferous rugose corals of Scotland. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, 91–93:1204.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1981. Coelenterata. Supplement 1. Rugosa and Tabulata, p. F1F762. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America and University Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. G. S. 1929. On the Lower Carboniferous corals: Orionastraea and its distribution in the north of England. Proceedings of Leeds Philosophical Society, 1:440457.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. G. 1941. On the Carboniferous corals: Zaphrentis carruthersi sp. nov. from the Mirk Fell beds and its relation to the Z. delanouei species group. Yorkshire Geological Society Proceedings, 24:290311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffords, R. M. 1955. Mississippian corals from New Mexico and related Pennsylvanian species. University of Kansas Paleontology Contribution Article, 1:112.Google Scholar
Khoa, N. D. 1977. Carboniferous Rugosa and Heterocorallia from boreholes in the Lublin region (Poland). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 22:301404.Google Scholar
Koker, E. M. J. 1924. Anthozoa uit het Perm van het eiland Timor, I: Zaphrentidae, Plerophyllidae, Cystiphyllidae, Amphiastreidae. Minjwez Nederland-Oost-Indië, Jaarbuch, 51:150.Google Scholar
Kopaska-Merkel, D. C. and Haywick, D. W. 2001. A lone biodetrital mound in the Chesterian (Carboniferous) of Alabama? Sedimentary Geology, 145:253268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, G. H., James, W. C., and Thomas, W. A. 1981. Composition of Mississippian sandstones associated with southern Appalachian-Ouachita orogen. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 65:1,4441,456.Google Scholar
Mars, J. C. and Thomas, W. A. 1999. Sequential filling of a late Paleozoic foreland basin. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 69:1,1911,208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, F. 1844. A synopsis of the characters of the Carboniferous limestone fossils of Ireland. University Press (Dublin), 207 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, F. 1849. On some new genera and species of Palaeozoic corals and foraminifera. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2:120, 119–136.Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1851. A description of some new Mountain Limestone fossils. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2:167175.Google Scholar
Miesfeldt, M. A. 1985. Facies relationships between the Parkwood and Bangor formations in the Black Warrior basin. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 149 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1893. Description of some new species of invertebrates from the Paleozoic rocks of Illinois and adjacent states. Bulletin of the Illinois State Museum of Natural History, 3:165.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1895. New and interesting species of Paleozoic fossils. Bulletin of the Illinois State Museum of Natural History, 1,895:1–89.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. and Haime, J. 1848. Recherches sur les polypiers, premier memorie; observations sur la structure et le d'eveloppement des polypiers en general. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 9:3789.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. and Haime, J. 1850. A monograph of the British fossil corals. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, 1322.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. and Haime, J. 1851. Monographie des polypiers fossils des terrains Paléozoiques, precede d'un tableau general de la classification des Polypes. Archives du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris, 5:1502.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. and Haime, J. J., 1852. A Monograph of the British fossil corals. Vol. 2, p. 147210. Palaeontographical Society, London.Google Scholar
Nix, M. A. 1991. Facies and facies relationships of the lower part of the Parkwood Formation in the Black Warrior basin of Mississippi and Alabama. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 1,362 p.Google Scholar
Nudds, J. R. 1980. An illustrated key to the British lithostrotionid corals. Acta Paleontologica Polonica, 25:385394.Google Scholar
Pashin, J. C. (ed.). 1993. New perspectives on the Mississippian System of Alabama. Alabama Geological Society Field Trip Guidebook, 30:1151.Google Scholar
Poty, E. 1981. Recherches sur les Tétracoralliaires et les Hétérocoralliaires du Viséen de la Belgique. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst , 35:1161.Google Scholar
Poty, E. and Hannay, D. 1994. Stratigraphy of rugose corals in the Dinantian of the Boulonnais (France). Memoires de l'Institut Géologique de l'Université de Louvain, 35:5182.Google Scholar
Rindsberg, A. K. 1994. Ichnology of the upper Mississippian Hartselle Sandstone of Alabama, with notes on other Carboniferous formations. Alabama Geological Survey Bulletin, 158:1107.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, S. 2004. Taphonomic alterations in upper Viséan dissepimented rugose corals from the Sierra del Castillo Unit (Carboniferous, Córdoba, Spain). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 214:135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, S. and Falces, S. 1992. Corales rugosos. In Rodríguez, S. (ed.) Analisis paleontológico y sedimentológico de la Cuenca Carbonífera de los Santos de Maimona (Badajoz). Coloquios de Paleontología, 44:159218.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, S., Hernando, J. M., and Rodriguez-Curt, L. 2002. Estudio de los corales lithostrotiónidos del Viseense (Misisipiense) de la Unidad de la Sierra del Castillo (Córdoba, España). Revista Española de Paleontología, 17:1336.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, S. and Somerville, I. D. 2007. Comparison of rugose corals from the upper Viséan of SW Spain and Ireland: implications for improved resolutions in the late Mississippian coral biostratigraphy. In Hubman, B. and Piller, W. E. (eds.), Fossil Corals and Sponges: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and Porifera, Graz, 2003. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommissionen, 17:275302.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, S., Somerville, I. D., Said, I., and Cózar, P. 2012. Late Viséan coral fringing reef at Tiouinine (Morocco): implications for the role of rugose corals as reef-building organisms in the Mississippian. Geological Journal, 46:462476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, I., Somerville, I. D., Rodríguez, S., and Cózar, P. 2013. Mississippian corals from the Khenifra area, central Morocco: variation in assemblages related to changes in facies and paleoecology. Gondwana Research, 23:367379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sando, W. J. 1977 a. The status of North American upper Paleozoic coral biostratigraphy. Journal of Paleontology, 51:122.Google Scholar
Sando, W. J. 1977 b. Significance of coiled protocoralla in some Mississippian horn corals. Palaeontology, 20:4758.Google Scholar
Sando, W. J. 1983. Revision of Lithostrotionella (Coelenterata, Rugosa) from the Carboniferous and Permian. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1,247:152.Google Scholar
Sando, W. J. and Armstrong, A. K. 1977. The zoogeography of North American Mississippian corals. Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres, Memoire, 89:175184.Google Scholar
Sando, W. J. and Bamber, E. W. 1985. Coral zonation of the Mississippian System in the Western Interior Province of North America. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1,334:161.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R. 2002. PALEOMAP website. http://www.scotese.com.Google Scholar
Semenoff-Tian-Chansky, P. 1974. Recherches sur les Tétracoralliaires du Carbonifére du Sahara occidental. Editions du Centre Nationelle de la Recherche Scientifique, Ser. 6, Science de la Terre, 30:1316.Google Scholar
Semenoff-Tian-Chansky, P. and Nudds, J. R. 1979. Revision de quelques espèces de Lithostrotion des Iles Britaniques décrites par Milne-Edwards and Haime (Tétracoralliaires carbonifères). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 1:245283.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. B. 1900. Preliminary descriptions of new genera of Palaeozoic rugose corals. New York State Museum Bulletin, 8:199222.Google Scholar
Somerville, I. D., Cózar, P., Said, I., Vachard, D., Medina-Varea, P., and Rodríguez, S. 2013. Palaeobiogeographical constraints on the distribution of foraminifers and rugose corals in the Carboniferous Tindouf Basin, S. Morocco. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2:118.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. A. 1972. Mississippian stratigraphy of Alabama. Alabama Geological Survey Monograph, 12:1121.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. A. and Mack, G. H. 1982. Paleogeographic relationship of a Mississippian barrier-island and shelf-bar system (Hartselle Sandstone) in Alabama to the Appalachian-Ouachita orogenic belt. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 93:619.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, A. 1906. Faunal lists and account of the faunal succession and correlation. In Matley, C. A. and Vaughan, A. (eds.), The Carboniferous rocks at Rush (County Dublin). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 62:295322.Google Scholar
Verril, A. E. 1865. Classification of polyps (Extract condensed from a synopsis of the polypi of the North Pacific Exploring Expedition, under captains Ringgold and Rodgers, U.S.N.). Essex Institute Proceedings, 4:145149.Google Scholar
Webb, G. E. 1987. The coral fauna of the Pitkin Formation (Chesterian), northeastern Oklahoma and northwestern Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 61:462493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, G. E., Sando, W. J., and Raymond, A. 1997. Mississippian coral latitudinal diversity gradients (Western Interior United States): testing the limits of high resolution diversity data. Journal of Paleontology, 71:780791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyer, D. 1973. Einige Rugose Korallen aus der Erbslochgrauwacke (Unterdevon) des Unterharzes. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften, 1:4565.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-4qfsd Total loading time: 0.469 Render date: 2021-01-19T16:26:36.048Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mississippian Rugose Corals from Alabama: A Review
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Mississippian Rugose Corals from Alabama: A Review
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Mississippian Rugose Corals from Alabama: A Review
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *