Review process
This journal uses a double-anonymised model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other.
Appeals will only be considered if they refer to a specific manuscript and must be based on evidence that either (1) an editor or reviewer made a significant factual error/a major misunderstanding of a manuscript, or (2) the integrity of the editorial decision making process was compromised. In general, only one appeal per manuscript per decision stage will be considered. To appeal a decision, please contact ann.w.jmoassist@gmail.com.