Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T20:31:21.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Costs of Going Global

Lower Court Response to Constitutional Cross-Fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Maureen Stobb
Maureen Stobb*
Affiliation:
Georgia Southern University, USA
*
Contact the author at mstobb@georgiasouthern.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Supreme Court influence depends greatly on the responses of lower court judges to its precedent. Justices employ numerous strategies to obtain lower court deference to their decisions, including the provocative practice of relying upon foreign law. Referred to as “constitutional cross-fertilization” when used in constitutional interpretation, this practice is labeled by critics as a threat to American democracy. Research suggests that the Court uses such references strategically to prop up controversial and ideologically charged decisions, and that they obtain a benefit in the form of increased citations. These studies do not tell us if the Court gains lower court deference. I contend that, in constitutional cases, lower court judges will not find reliance upon such sources persuasive; rather, they will regard these references with disdain. My findings support my argument. Contrary to the justices’ intentions, reliance upon foreign law in constitutional cases is associated with an increased probability of negative, as opposed to positive, treatment. Justices incur significant costs from participating in the global rights dialogue.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , Fall 2021 , pp. 215 - 232
Copyright
© 2021 Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks Brett Curry, Amanda Driscoll, Ryan Black, Justin Wedeking, and the anonymous reviewers for valuable insights, and Jonathan Cruz for research assistance. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2019 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

References

Austin, Peter C., and Janet E. Hux. 2002. “A Brief Note on Overlapping Confidence Intervals.” Journal of Vascular Surgery 36 (1): 194–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C., and Malia Reddick. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 534–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, and Jennifer L. Brookhart. 2014. “We Are the World: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Sources of Law.” British Journal of Political Science 46:891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Daniel E. Walters, and Jennifer L. Brookhart. 2014. “Upending a Global Debate: An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Use of Transnational Law to Interpret Domestic Doctrine.” Georgetown Law Journal 103 (1): 1–46.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, and Patrick Wohlfarth. 2016. U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Ryan C., and James F. Spriggs II. 2013. “The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2): 325–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Saul, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995. Stare Indecisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, A. Christopher. 2011. “Foreign Law as Legislative Fact in Constitutional Cases.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2011: 1005–40.Google Scholar
Buys, Cindy G. 2007. “Burying Our Constitution in the Sand? Evaluating the Ostrich Response to the Use of International and Foreign Law in U.S. Constitutional Interpretation.” Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 21 (1): 1–55.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven G., and Stephanie Dotson Zimdahl. 2005. “The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision.” William and Mary Law Review 47 (3): 743–909.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Charles A. Johnson. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, Christopher J., Peter K. Enns, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S., and Benjamin Lauderdale. 2010. “Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 871–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Paul. 2008. Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., Robert M. Howard, and David C. Nixon. 2005. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. 2013. The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., and Justin Wedeking. 2014. “The (Dis)Advantage of Certainty: The Importance of Certainty in Language.” Law and Society Review 48 (1): 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, Brett, and Banks Miller. 2008. “Looking for Law in All the Wrong Places? Foreign Law and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court.” Politics and Policy 36 (6): 1094–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, William M. Landes, and Richard A. Posner. 2012. “Are Even Unanimous Decisions in the United States Supreme Court Ideological?” Northwestern University Law Review 106:699–713 (Symposium).Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23:303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (January): 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. 2007. “The Supreme Court, the Law of Nations, and Citations of Foreign Law: The Lessons of History.” California Law Review 95:1335–65.Google Scholar
Giles, Michael W., Virginia A. Hettinger, and Todd Peppers. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 623–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruhl, John. 1980. “The Supreme Court’s Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 33 (4): 502–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2010. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G. 2017. “Vertical Stare Decisis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Judicial Behavior, ed. Lee Epstein and Stephanie A. Lindquist, 219–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., and James F. Spriggs. 2006. The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, Matthew P. 2016. “Measuring Precedent in the Judicial Hierarchy.” Law and Society Review 50 (1): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert J. 2006. “The Use of Rhetorical Sources by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Law and Society Review 40 (4): 817–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Hon. Dennis. 2010. “Role of Foreign Law in American Courts.” Panel sponsored by the Committee on Foreign and Comparative Law and hosted by the New York City Bar Association. C-SPAN. https://www.c-span.org/video/?291501-1/foreign-law-domestic-courts.Google Scholar
Johnson, Charles A. 1979. “Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions: A Quantitative Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 792–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P., and Eduardo L. Leoni. 2007. “Using Graphs Instead of Tables in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (4): 755–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 2004. “International Law as Part of Our Law.” American Journal of International Law 98 (1): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luse, Jennifer K., Geoffrey McGovern, Wendy L. Martinek, and Sarah C. Benesh. 2009. “Such Inferior Courts: Compliance by Circuits with Jurisprudential Regimes.” American Politics Research 37 (1): 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., Justin Wedeking, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (1): 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, Austen L. 2007. “Storm in a Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Law.” University of Illinois Law Review 2:637–80.Google Scholar
Peltason, J. W. 1971. Fifty-Eight Lonely Men. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 2004. “No Thanks, We Already Have Our Own Laws.” Legal Affairs. https://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/July-August-2004/feature_posner_julaug04.msp.Google Scholar
Schenker, Nathaniel, and Jane F. Gentleman. 2001. “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap between Confidence Intervals.” American Statistician 55 (3): 182–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Stephen A. 2013. “The Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43 (2): 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaeth, Harold, Lee Epstein, Ted Ruger, Jeffrey Segal, Andrew D. Martin, and Sara Benesh. 2019. Supreme Court Database, Version 2019 Release 1. http://supremecourtdatabase.org.Google Scholar
Stobb, Maureen. 2018. “Threat and Suspicion: Scalia’s Legacy for a Transnational Judicial Dialogue.” In The Conservative Revolution of Antonin Scalia, ed. David A. Schultz and Howard Schweber, 93–124. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wasby, Steve. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Westerland, Chad, Jeffrey A. Segal, Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Scott Comparato. 2010. “Strategic Defiance and Compliance in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 891–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Hon. J. Harvie III. 2004. “The Use of International Law in Judicial Decisions.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 27:423–29.Google Scholar
Zaring, David. 2006. “The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 3 (2): 297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stobb Supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 438.4 KB