Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Clinical outcomes of tracheoesophageal diversion for intractable aspiration

  • K Adachi (a1), T Umezaki (a1), H Kiyohara (a1), H Miyaji (a1) and S Komune (a1)...

Abstract

Objectives:

The purpose of the present study was to examine the clinical outcomes of using tracheoesophageal diversion for preventing intractable aspiration.

Method:

We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients who underwent tracheoesophageal diversion from 2003 to 2009 at our hospital (median age, 25 years; range, 0–78 years). End-to-side anastomosis was used in 16 cases and side-to-side anastomosis was used in 9.

Results:

The average operative time was 141 minutes for end-to-side anastomosis and 191 minutes for side-to-side anastomosis. Peri-operative complications were observed in only two (8 per cent) cases: one with infection and one with haematoma. No fistulas were observed. Aspiration was prevented in all cases, but the nutritional route depended on the swallowing function of the patient. Oral feeding was the main nutritional route after surgery in only four patients (16 per cent).

Conclusion:

This procedure is well suited to patients who lack speech communication and are at high risk of aspiration.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Kazuo Adachi, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Fax: +81 92 6425685 E-mail: adakazu@qent.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp

References

Hide All
1Lindeman, RC. Diverting the paralyzed larynx: a reversible procedure for intractable aspiration. Laryngoscope 1975;85:157–80
2Krespi, YP, Quatela, VC, Sisson, GA, Som, ML. Modified tracheoesophageal diversion for chronic aspiration. Laryngoscope 1984;94:1298–301
3Yarington, CT, Sutton, D. Clinical experience with the tracheoesophageal anastomosis for intractable aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976;85:609–12
4Baron, BC, Dedo, HH. Separation of the larynx and trachea for intractable aspiration. Laryngoscope 1980;90:1927–32
5Montgomery, WW. Surgery to prevent aspiration. Arch Otolaryngol 1975;101:679–82
6Sasaki, CT, Milmoe, G, Yanagisawa, E, Berry, K, Kirchner, JA. Surgical closure of the larynx for intractable aspiration. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:422–3
7Habal, MB, Murray, JE. Surgical treatment of life-endangering chronic aspiration pneumonia. Plast Reconst Surg 1972;49:305–11
8Biller, HF, Lawson, W, Beak, SM. Total glossectomy. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109:6973
9Zocratto, OB, Savassi-Rocha, PR, Paixão, RM, Salles, JM. Laryngotracheal separation surgery: outcome in 60 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:571–5
10Eibling, DE, Snyderman, CH, Eibling, C. Laryngotracheal separation for intractable aspiration: a retrospective review of 34 patients. Laryngoscope 1995;105:83–5
11Manrique, D, Settanni, FA, Camponês do Brasil Ode, O. Surgery for aspiration: analysis of laryngotracheal separation in 23 children. Dysphagia 2006;21:254–8
12Eisele, DW, Yarington, CT Jr, Lindeman, RC, Larrabee, WF Jr. The tracheoesophageal diversion and laryngotracheal separation procedures for treatment of intractable aspiration. Am J Surg 1989;157:230–6
13Pletcher, SD, Mandpe, AH, Block, MI, Cheung, SW. Reversal of laryngotracheal separation: a detailed case report with long-term followup. Dysphagia 2005;20:1922
14Tomita, T, Tanaka, K, Shinden, S, Ogawa, K. Tracheoesophageal diversion versus total laryngectomy for intractable aspiration. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:1518

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed