Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T23:49:21.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consensus, Ideology and Labor Relations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

James O. Morris*
Affiliation:
Division of International Activities, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University

Extract

Why is there grave ideological division in some societies and an overwhelming consensus in others? Miserable living conditions as opposed to high material standards? Inflation or economic stabilization? The immigration of “radical” workers and the inflow of extremist literature as opposed to the maintenance of a “homogenous” population and, perhaps, censorship? Capitalist exploitation and the class struggle as contrasted with socialist competition and classlessness? Although some of these economic and political counterpropositions might, if carefully analyzed, yield helpful answers to the question posed, such phenomena are often symptomatic of deeper dislocations in society. One of these deeper dislocations which can, in the opinion of this writer, provide real understanding of ideological division involves the maturation process as it occurs in individuals, in the family, and ultimately in society as a whole. It is the thesis of this article that when the maturation process is unduly slowed or interrupted consensus in society may be sacrificed and social crisis may result. Analysis is developed around a social-psychological framework and consensus in society and in the labor relations system is explored from this point of view.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is taken largely from a book manuscript titled “The Labor Relations System in Chile” which, it is hoped, will shortly be published in its entirety.

References

1 See his introduction to Bendix, Reinhard, Work and Authority in Industry (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1956), p. xii Google Scholar.

2 Dunlop, Industrial Relations Systems (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1958), pp. 16-17.

3 Kerr, Clark, Dunlop, John T., Harbison, Frederick H., and Myers, Charles A., Industrialism and Industrial Man (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960), pp. 42, 44, 64, 76.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., pp. 7, 8, 30, 228-229.

5 John P. Windmuller, “Model Industrial Relations Systems,” Reprint No. 151, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, 1963, pp. 6-7.

6 Walter Galenson, “Why the American Labor Movement is Not Socialist,” Reprint No. 168, Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California (Berkeley), 1961, p. 10.

7 Kerr, et. al., Industrialism and Industrial Man, p. 217.