Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:21:35.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The economic impact of legislation and litigation on growth: a historical analysis of Italy from its unification to World War II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

GIUSEPPE DI VITA ,
FABIO DI VITA  and
GIANLUCA CAFISO
GIUSEPPE DI VITA*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
FABIO DI VITA*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
GIANLUCA CAFISO*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
*
*Email: gdivita@lex.unict.it
**Email: f.divita@unict.it
***Email: gcafiso@unict.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the impact of Italy's unification on its economic growth from 1861 to the outbreak of World War II. This historical analysis attempts to prove that the process of legislative harmonization intrinsic to the unification had a positive effect on Italy's GDP because legislative uniformity facilitates economic transactions. Moreover a uniform and more effective legislation would have caused less litigation and therefore favoured economic growth, thanks to smoother relations between economic agents.

Type
Symposium on the Empirics of Judicial Institutions
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 121 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Johnson, S. (2005), ‘Unbundling institutions’, Journal of Political Economy, 113 (5): 949–995.Google Scholar
A'Hearn, B., Auria, C. and Vecchi, G. (2011), Istruzione. In Vecchi, G. (ed.). In ricchezza e povertà. Il benessere degli italiani dall'Unità a oggi. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 159–206.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Nicoletti, G. and Schiantarelli, F. (2003), ‘Regulation and investment’, working paper #9560, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Aquarone, A. (1960), L'unificazione legislativa e i codici del 1865. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Arcand, J. L., Berkes, E. and Panizza, U.. (2015), ‘Too much finance?’ Journal of Economic Growth, 20 (2): 105–48.Google Scholar
Archivio Centrale dello Stato, Raccolta ufficiale delle leggi e dei decreti del Regno d'Italia [official gazette], various issues.Google Scholar
Baffigi, A. (2011), ‘Italian national accounts, 1861–2011’, Banca d'Italia, Quaderni di Storia Economica, No 18.Google Scholar
Bardhan, P. (2002), ‘Decentralization of governance and development’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (4): 185–205.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1996), Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. Working Paper No. 5698. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (2013), ‘Democracy, law and order and economic growth’, in Miller, T., Holmes, K. R., Feulner, E. J., Kim, A. B., Riley, B. and Roberts, J. M. (eds) Index of Economic Freedom. New York: Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
Bianco, M. and Napolitano, G. (2013), Il sistema amministrativo: uno svantaggio competitivo. In Toniolo, G. (ed.). L'Italia e l'economia mondiale dall'Unità ad oggi. Venice: Marsilio, 735–83.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J. and Leeson, P. T. (2008), ‘Institutional stickiness and the new development economics’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67 (2): 331–58.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Giavazzi, F. (2003), ‘Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (3): 879–908.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. and Melis, G. (1990), ‘Lo sviluppo dell'amministrazione italiana (1880–1920)’, Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico, 2: 333–57.Google Scholar
Cassese, S. (2014), Governare gli Italiani. Storia dello Stato. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cecchi, C. (1975), Analisi statistica dei procedimenti di cognizione in Italia. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Clemenz, G. and Gugler, K.. (2000), ‘Macroeconomic development and civil litigation’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 9 (3): 205–30.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W. and Seater, J.. (2013), ‘Federal regulation and aggregate economic growth’, Journal of Economic Growth, 18 (2): 137–77.Google Scholar
Di Vita, G. (2010), ‘Production of laws and delay in court decisions’, International Review of Law and Economics, 30 (3): 276–81.Google Scholar
Di Vita, G. (2012a), ‘The determinants of legal disputes duration: an empirical analysis with micro data’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 168 (4): 563–87.Google Scholar
Di Vita, G. (2012b), ‘Normative complexity and the length of administrative disputes: evidence from Italian regions’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 34 (1): 197–213.Google Scholar
Di Vita, G. (2017), ‘Institutional quality and the growth rates of the Italian regions: the costs of regulatory complexity’, forthcoming in Papers in Regional Science.Google Scholar
Djankov, S., LaPorta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A.. (2002), ‘The regulation of entry’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Djankov, S., McLiesh, C. and Ramalho, R.. (2006), ‘Regulation and growth’, Economics Letters, 92 (3): 395–401.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1893. [1964/1984]), The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. and Stock, J.. (1996), ‘Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root’, Econometrica, 64 (4): 813–36.Google Scholar
Felice, E. (2013), Perché il Sud è rimasto indietro. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Felice, E. (2015), Ascesa e declino. Storia economica d'Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (2004), ‘Freedom's friend’, Wall Street Journal, 11 June.Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, C. (1982), Unità nazionale e unificazione giuridica in Italia. La codificazione del diritto nel Risorgimento. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, C. (1994), La codificazione del diritto in Italia (1865–1942). Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Giannini, M. S. (1962), ‘Problemi dell'amministrazione delle regioni insufficientemente sviluppate’, Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico, 12 (3): 552–78.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (2000), ‘Does law matter for economic development? Evidence from East Asia’, Law and Society Review, 34 (3): 829–56.Google Scholar
Giolitti, G. (1922), Memorie della mia vita. Milan: Fratelli Treves.Google Scholar
Goff, B. (1996), Regulation and Macroeconomic Performance. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2006), ‘What are institutions?’ Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 2–25.Google Scholar
Jacobi, T. (2009), ‘The role of politics and economics in explaining variation in litigation rates in the US States’, Journal of Legal Studies, 38 (1): 205–33.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2003), ‘Governance matters’, working paper #3106, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Khan, F. A. and Hudson, J. (2014). ‘Initial human capital and the rule of the law: what matters for human convergence of poor countries?’, Applied Economics, 46 (2): 179–89.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992), ‘Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?’, Journal of econometrics, 54 (1–3): 159–78.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopes-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer A, A.. and Vishny, R. W. (1998), ‘Law and finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–55.Google Scholar
Levine, R. (2005), ‘Finance and growth: theory and evidence’, Chapter 12 in Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1. Elsevier, pp. 865–934.Google Scholar
Loayza, N. V., Oviedo, A. M. and Serven, L. (2005), ‘The impact of regulation on growth and informality– cross-country evidence’, Research working paper no. WPS 3623, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Marcos, F., Santalò, J. and Sanchez Graells, A. (2010), ‘Measuring regulatory intensity by the Spanish Regions (1978–2009)’, Indret, April.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867). Capital, Volume I. Translated by Fowkes, B (1990). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Melis, G. (2010), ‘La nascita dell'amministrazione nell'Italia unita’, Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico, 2: 451–66.Google Scholar
Melis, G. (2014), Fare lo Stato per fare gli Italiani. Ricerche di storia delle istituzioni dell'Italia unita. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ministero dell'Interno – Direzione Generale di Statistica (1878), Annuario Statistico Italiano, Rome: Tipografia Elzeviriana.Google Scholar
Ministero di Agricoltura, Industria e Commercio – Direzione della Statistica Generale (1881), Annuario Statistico Italiano, Rome: Tipografia Eredi Botta.Google Scholar
Ministero di Agricoltura, Industria e Commercio – Direzione della Statistica Generale (1884), Annuario Statistico Italiano, Rome: Tipografia Eredi Botta.Google Scholar
Montes, G. C. and Paschoal, P. C. (2016), ‘Corruption: what are the effects on government effectiveness? Empirical evidence considering developed and developing countries’, Applied Economics Letters, 23 (2): 146–50.Google Scholar
Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. and Salvador-Mora, S. (2016), ‘El impacto económico de la actividad normativa. Los riesgos de la “gran convergencia”’, Revista de Economía Industrial, 98 (3): 117–28.Google Scholar
Mori, G. (1992), L'economia italiana dagli anni Ottanta alla prima guerra mondiale. In Mori, G. (ed.). Storia dell'industria elettrica in Italia, I, Le origini. 1882–1914. Roma-Bari: Laterza, pp. 1–160.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, G., Bassanini, A., Ernst, E., Jean, S., Santiago, P. and Swaim, P. (2001), ‘Product and labor markets interactions in OECD Countries’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 312, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, G. and Scarpetta, S. (2003), ‘Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence’, Economic Policy, 18 (36): 9–72.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1994). ‘Performance through time’, American Economic Review, 84 (3): 359–68.Google Scholar
OECD (2014), Economic Policy Reforms: Going for Growth. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Palumbo, G., Giupponi, G., Nunziata, L. and Mora-Sanguinetti, J. (2013), ‘The economics of civil justice: new cross-country data and empirics’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1060.Google Scholar
Pecorari, P. (ed.). (2003), L'Italia economica. Tempi e fenomeni del cambiamento (1861–1963). Padua: Cedam.Google Scholar
Pflanze, O. (1971), Bismarck and the Development of Germany: The Period of Unification, Volume 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. C. and Perron, P. (1988), ‘Testing for a unit root in time series regression’, Biometrika, 75 (2): 335–46.Google Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, X., Doppelhofer, G. and Miller, R. I. (2004), ‘Determinants of long-term growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach’, American Economic Review, 94 (4): 813–35.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2010), Constitutional and Administrative Law (2nd edn), Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. (1923), Law in Economy and Society. Edited with an introduction and annotations by M. Rheinstein. Translation by Shils, E. and Rheinstein, M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
World Justice Project (2015), Rule of Law Index. Washington, DC: World Justice Project.Google Scholar
Young, A. T., Higgins, M. and Levy, D. (2008), ‘Sigma convergence versus beta convergence: Evidence from US county-level data’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40 (5): 1083–93.Google Scholar