Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T05:44:51.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Grammar of the Greek Language. By Joseph Wright. Pp. 384. Henry Frowde, 1912. 6s. net.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 32 , November 1912 , pp. 407 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The choice of the symbol j instead of y to represent the sound of the English and Sanskrit y and the German j is unfortunate, especially as it is applied even to Latin, where i might have sufficed. If the author thought it worth while to depart from the established symbols ḭ and ṷ, there is every reason for preferring the y, since in writing English and Sanskrit, not to mention French, j is used with quite a different meaning.

2 Brugmann, 's Kurze Vergl. Grammatik, p. 361Google Scholar; cf. Classical Review, xviii. (1904), p. 413.