Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:42:21.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Treated like Chinamen’: United States immigration restriction and white British subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

Anne Rees
Anne Rees*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: a.rees@latrobe.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1921, the United States introduced national immigration quotas. Although designed to curb the arrival of ‘undesirables’ from south-east Europe, this quota system also applied to Britain and its white Dominions. By 1929, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa were each allocated 100 quota places per annum. The British quota was far greater, but still struggled to meet demand. Through a focus on the Australian example, this article investigates how an immigration regime intended to bolster America’s ‘Anglo-Saxon’ identity also exposed the limits of Anglospheric kinship by closing the gates to white Britons. Although the quotas had a comparatively minor impact on Britons, their exclusion held great significance in the context of Anglo-American relations, where the rhetoric of transnational white solidarity produced expectations of unqualified welcome in the United States. After 1921, as such welcome disappeared and then failed to rematerialize, the global community of white men’s countries was shaken and remade.

Keywords

AustraliaBritainimmigrationUnited Stateswhiteness
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 239 - 260
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thank you to audience and panel members at the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Conference, the Australian Historical Association Conference, the University of Melbourne Brown Bag Seminar, and the La Trobe University History Seminar for your comments on earlier versions of this article. Thanks also to the peer reviewers and the Journal editors for their helpful feedback.

References

1 Cresswell, Tim, ‘Towards a politics of mobility’, Environment and Planning D, 28, 1, 2010, p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Parker, Kunal Madhukar, Making foreigners: immigration and citizenship law in America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Report of the Secretary of Labor, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1922, p. 43. Google Scholar

3 Ngai, Mae M., ‘The architecture of race in American immigration law: a reexamination of the Immigration Act of 1924’, Journal of American History, 86, 1, 1999, pp. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Congressional Record, 61, 9, 1921, p. 8938.

5 Gerstle, Gary, American crucible: race and nation in the twentieth century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017 Google Scholar; Ngai, Mae M., Impossible subjects: illegal aliens and the making of modern America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

6 Grant, Madison, The passing of the great race: or the racial basis of European history, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1916, p. 70.Google Scholar

7 House Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, Percentage plans for restriction of immigration, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1919, p. 196.Google Scholar

8 Congressional Record, 61, 1, 21 April 1921, p. 554.

9 Bashford, Alison, ‘Immigration restriction: rethinking period and place from settler colonies to postcolonial nations’, Journal of Global History, 9, 1, 2014, p. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Ibid., pp. 26, 33.

11 Bashford, Alison and Gilchrist, Catie, ‘The colonial history of the 1905 Aliens Act’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 40, 3, 2012, pp. 409–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Kramer, Paul, ‘The geopolitics of mobility: immigration policy and American global power in the long twentieth century’, American Historical Review, 123, 2, 2018, pp. 393–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Oyen, Meredith, The diplomacy of migration: transnational lives and the making of U.S.–Chinese relations in the Cold War, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gabaccia, Donna R., Foreign relations: American immigration in global perspective, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010 Google Scholar; Lew-Williams, Beth, ‘Before restriction came exclusion: America’s experiment with diplomatic immigration control’, Pacific Historical Review, 83, 1, 2014, pp. 24–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hajimu, Masuda, ‘Rumours of war: immigration disputes and the social construction of American–Japanese relations, 1905–1913’, Diplomatic History, 33, 1, 2009, pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Adams, Iestyn, Brothers across the ocean: British foreign policy and the origins of the Anglo-American ‘special relationship’, 1900–1905, London: I.B. Tauris, 2005.Google Scholar

15 Lake, Marilyn and Reynolds, Henry, Drawing the global colour line: white men’s countries and the question of racial equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Kramer, Paul A., ‘Empires, exceptions, and Anglo-Saxons: race and rule between the British and United States empires, 1880–1910’, Journal of American History, 88, 4, 2002, pp. 1315–53 Google Scholar; Bell, Duncan, ‘The project for a new Anglo century: space, race and global order’, in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., Anglo-America and its discontents, London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar

16 Anderson, Stuart, Race and rapprochement: Anglo-Saxonism and Anglo-American relations, 1895–1904, London: Associated University Presses, 1981.Google Scholar

17 Congressional Record, 61, 2, 31 May 1921, p. 1893.

18 Lake and Reynolds, Drawing the global colour line, pp. 310–30.

19 Chang, Kornel, Pacific connections: the making of the U.S.–Canadian borderlands, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012 Google Scholar; McKeown, Adam M., Melancholy order: Asian migration and the globalization of borders, New York: Columbia University Press, 2008 Google Scholar; Ngai, Mae M., ‘Chinese gold miners and the “Chinese question” in nineteenth-century California and Victoria’, Journal of American History, 101, 4, 2015, pp. 1082–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Atkinson, David C., The burden of white supremacy: containing Asian migration in the British empire and the United States, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2016, pp. 4, 16.Google Scholar

21 Lake and Reynolds, Drawing the global colour line, p. 4.

22 The sole study is Rhodes, Benjamin D., ‘A modern “Black Hole of Calcutta”? The Anglo-American controversy over Ellis Island, 1921–1924’, New York History, 66, 3, 1985, pp. 229–48.Google Scholar

23 Garland, Libby, After they closed the gates: Jewish illegal immigration to the United States, 1921–1965, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2014, pp. 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Lake and Reynolds, Drawing the global colour line, pp. 15–45.

25 Steel, Frances, ‘Re-routing empire? Steam-age circulations and the making of an Anglo Pacific, c.1850–90’, Australian Historical Studies, 46, 3, 2015, pp. 356–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Shiells, Georgia, ‘Immigration history and whiteness studies: American and Australian approaches compared’, History Compass, 8, 8, 2010, pp. 797–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Lake, Marilyn, ‘British world or new world? Anglo-Saxonism and Australian engagement with America’, History Australia, 10, 3, 2013, pp. 36–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lake, Marilyn and Pratt, Vanessa, ‘“Blood brothers”: racial identification and the right to rule’, Australian Journal of Politics & History, 54, 1, 2008, pp. 16–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marilyn Lake, Progressive new world: how settler colonialism and transpacific exchange shaped American reform, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2019.

28 Lake and Reynolds, Drawing the global colour line, p. 205.

29 Vamplew, Wray, Australian historical statistics, Sydney: Fairfax, Syme and Weldon, 1987, pp. 193, 196.Google Scholar

30 Lake, ‘British world or new world?’, pp. 36–8.

31 Sun (Sydney), 28 September 1919, p. 13.

32 Australian Census, 1921, pp. 209, 297.

33 Rees, Anne, ‘Reading Australian modernity: unsettled settlers and cultures of mobility’, History Compass, 15, 11, 2017, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Woollacott, Angela, To try her fortune in London: Australian women, colonialism, and modernity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

35 Annual report of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1900, p. 14 Google Scholar; Annual report of the Commissioner-General of Immigration, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1920, p. 90; United States Census, 1920, p. 693.Google Scholar

36 Lake and Reynolds, Drawing the global colour line, pp. 62–6, 129–31, 317.

37 Abstract of reports of the Immigration Commission, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1911, p. 47.Google Scholar

38 Garland, After they closed the gates, p. 37.

39 Abstract of reports of the Immigration Commission, p. 47.

40 Atkinson, David C., ‘The international consequences of American national origins quotas: the Australian case’, Journal of American Studies, 50, 2, 2016, pp. 377–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 National Archives of Australia, Canberra (henceforth NAA), A981/UNI26, Sheldon to Bloch, 23 June 1921, and Press release, 25 October 1921.

42 Hearings before the Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1922, p. 309.Google Scholar

43 US National Archives Record Administration (henceforth NARA), RG 85, 55224/052, 55224/052A, 55224/052B.

44 NAA, A981/UNI26, Sheldon to Hughes, 18 November 1921; Argus (Melbourne), 16 January 1923, p. 9.

45 Hearings before the Committee, pp. 303–6.

46 NARA, RG 85, Arrival Case Files, no. 20378/002-01, Telegram, 21 July 1921.

47 News (Adelaide), 13 September 1924, p. 6.

48 Sun (Newcastle), 11 January 1922, p. 1; Sun (Sydney), 5 January 1922, p. 8.

49 NARA, RG 85, 55099/8C.

50 Hidetaka, Hirota, ‘Exclusion on the ground: racism, official discretion, and the quotidian enforcement of general immigration law in the Pacific Northwest borderland’, American Quarterly, 69, 2, 2017, pp. 347–70.Google Scholar

51 Register (Adelaide), 15 March 1922, p. 6.

52 NARA, RG 85, 55099/011, Husband memorandum, 4 June 1921.

53 Balachandran, G., ‘Indefinite transits: mobility and confinement in the age of steam’, Journal of Global History, 11, 2, 2016, p. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54 NARA, RG 85, 55099/030, Vancouver to Husband, 27 June 1921.

55 NARA, RG 85, 55034/016.

56 NARA, RG 59, 150.47, McDermott file, 1921.

57 Age (Melbourne), 8 September 1922, p. 9; Argus (Melbourne), 4 November 1922, p. 8; Daily Examiner (Grafton), 6 January 1922, p. 5.

58 NARA, RG 85, 55130/024, Glanvill testimony; Argus (Melbourne), 8 September 1921, p. 7; West Australian (Perth), 12 September 1921, p. 7.

59 Argus (Melbourne), 4 November 1922, p. 8.

60 Hearings before the Committee, p. 308.

61 NAA, A981/UNI26, Sheldon to Hughes, 16 February 1922.

62 NAA, A981/UNI26, Reynolds to his mother, 11 May 1922.

63 Argus (Melbourne), 4 July 1922, p. 7; Press (Canterbury), 14 July 1922, p. 12; New York Times, 27 August 1922, p. 106.

64 NAA, A981/UNI26, Hughes to Sammonds, 7 July 1922; Sammonds to Hughes, 10 July 1922.

65 NARA, RG 85, 55099/011, Husband memorandum, 4 June 1921.

66 NAA, A981/UNI26, Telegram, 22 August 1922.

67 Age (Melbourne), 12 August 1922, p. 15; Daily Mail (Brisbane), 22 July 1923, p. 1; Richmond River Express, 17 September 1924, p. 4.

68 Oregon Statesman, 17 July 1923, p. 6.

69 Age (Melbourne), 17 August 1922, p. 10; Sun (Sydney), 23 August 1922, p. 1.

70 New York Times, 17 September 1922, p. 110, and 27 August 1922, p. 106.

71 Atkinson, Burden of white supremacy, p. 10.

72 Mongia, Radhika, ‘Race, nationality, mobility: a history of the passport’, in Burton, Antoinette, ed., After the imperial turn: thinking with and through the nation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003, p. 200.Google Scholar

73 Daily Mail (Brisbane), 27 August 1922, p. 8; Daily Herald (Adelaide), 30 October 1923, p. 4.

74 Hearings before the Committee, p. 309.

75 Erika Lee and Yung, Judy, Angel Island: immigrant gateway to America, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 8, 58; NAA, A981/UNI26, Campbell to Geddes, 10 November 1922.Google Scholar

76 Don Dorrigo Gazette, 20 September 1924, p. 6; Mail (Adelaide), 20 September 1924, p. 1.

77 Age (Melbourne), 30 December 1927, p. 5.

78 NARA, RG 85, 55383/028, Seattle to Hull, 22 October 1926.

79 Sun (Sydney), 19 August 1922, p. 4; Daily Mail (Brisbane), 17 September 1922, p. 7; Argus (Melbourne), 4 July 1922, p. 7.

80 Morning Bulletin (Rockhampton), 5 December 1923, p. 5.

81 Sun (Sydney), 23 August 1922, p. 1

82 Truth (Perth), 20 December 1924, p. 1.

83 Kramer, ‘Empires’, pp. 8, 18.

84 Argus (Melbourne), 4 July 1922, p. 7.

85 Smith’s Weekly (Sydney), 5 September 1931, p. 8.

86 Sun (Sydney), 27 August 1922, p. 3.

87 NAA, A981/UNI26, Telegram, 10 January 1922.

88 NAA, A981/UNI26, Hughes to Sammonds, 7 July 1922.

89 NAA, A981/UNI26, Elder to Carr, 22 September 1925.

90 House of Commons, Hansard, 159, 6 December 1922, cols. 1728–9; The National Archives, UK (henceforth TNA), FO 612/97, FO 372/2678, FO 372/2679, FO 372/2680.

91 NARA, RG 85, 55130/024, Curzon to Geddes, 16 September 1921.

92 Congressional Record, 61, 7, 5 November 1921, p. 7422.

93 Despatch from H. M. Ambassador at Washington, London: HMSO, 1923, pp. 8–11.

94 Ottawa Journal, 21 June 1923, p. 11; Churchill Archive Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge, GBR/0014/GEDD, Papers of Sir Auckland Geddes, 5/3.

95 Straits Times, 18 August 1923, p. 9; Journal de Genéve, 21 August 1923, p. 3.

96 TNA, FO 115/2823, Sivyer to British Consul-General, 16 July 1923; Chilton to Hughes, 30 July 1923.

97 NARA, RG 85, 55130/024; TNA, FO 115/2667 and FO 115/2822.

98 NARA, RG 85, 55130/024 A, Langley to Husband, 9 December 1921.

99 Western Tribune (Vancouver), 25 September 1926, p. 1.

100 NARA, RG 85, 55130/024A, Consular Report, 4 November 1923.

101 NAA, A981/UNI26, Husband to Sheldon, 4 November 1921.

102 Truth (Sydney), 24 January 1926, p. 10.

103 NAA, A981/UNI26, Davis to Hughes, 26 November 1921.

104 Tuffnell, Stephen, ‘“Uncle Sam is to be sacrificed”: Anglophobia in late nineteenth-century politics and culture’, American Nineteenth Century History, 12, 1, 2011, pp. 77–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

105 TNA, FO 115/2824, British Consul-General, New York, memo, 29 June 1923.

106 NARA, RG 85, 55224/052, Husband to Ellis Island, 12 March 1923; Daily Herald (Adelaide), 4 April 1923, p. 3.

107 NARA, RG 85, 55130/024A, ‘Foreign propaganda’, 27 October 1921, and Husband to Townsend, 14 December 1921.

108 McKercher, B. J. C., ed., Anglo-American relations in the 1920s: the struggle for supremacy , Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

109 Washington Herald, 28 August 1922, p. 5; NARA, RG 85, 55130/024A, Gardiner to Hale, 11 November 1921.

110 NARA, RG 85, 55383/028A, Matson to White, 10 October 1927; NAA, A981/UNI 26, Campbell to Geddes, 10 November 1922.

111 Age (Melbourne), 3 September 1924, p. 14.

112 Hearings before the Committee, p. 308; Takai, Yukari, ‘Navigating transpacific passages: steamship companies, state regulators, and transshipment of Japanese in the early-twentieth-century Pacific Northwest’, Journal of Ethnic History, 30, 3, 2011, pp. 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

113 San Francisco Chronicle, 14 October 1922, p. 24, and 24 September 1921, p. 26.

114 Hearings before the Committee, p. 309.

115 Argus (Melbourne), 4 July 1922, p. 7.

116 Lee and Yung, Angel Island, pp. 31–4.

117 NARA, RG 85, Arrival Case Files, no. 22146/006-17.

118 NAA, A981/MIG80, Tredwell to Strahan, 11 August 1931.

119 Newcastle Sun, 7 December 1922, p. 1; Daily News (Perth), 7 December 1922, p. 7.

120 Calavita, Kitty, ‘The paradoxes of race, class, identity, and “passing”: enforcing the Chinese Exclusion Acts, 1882–1910’, Law & Social Inquiry, 25, 1, 2000, pp. 20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

121 Kramer, Paul A., ‘Imperial openings: civilization, exemption, and the geopolitics of mobility in the history of Chinese exclusion, 1868–1910’, Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 14, 3, 2015, pp. 317–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

122 Zolberg, Aristide, A nation by design: immigration policy in the fashioning of America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006, pp. 265–6.Google Scholar

123 Kramer, Paul, ‘Is the world our campus? International students and U.S. global power in the long twentieth century’, Diplomatic History, 33, 5, 2009, pp. 775–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

124 NARA, RG 85, 55639/577A.

125 Daily Standard (Brisbane), 12 June 1929, p. 9.

126 Jacobson, Matthew Frye, Whiteness of a different color: European immigrants and the alchemy of race, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998 Google Scholar; Guterl, Thomas Pratt, The color of race in America, 1900–1940, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

127 NAA, A981/MIG80, ‘Statement of quotas and demand for visas’, c.1929.

128 NARA, RG 85, 55431840, Consular report, February 1925.

129 NARA, RG 59, 150.47, ‘Proposed treaty’, 1929; TNA, FO115/3401 and FO372/2679.

130 National Library of Australia, MS1924, 25/79/1, ‘Relations between the United States and the British empire’, June 1929.

131 NARA, RG 85, 55383/028A, Skinner to Hull, 9 February 1927; NARA, RG 59, 150.47.

132 Sadowski-Smith, Claudia, ‘Unskilled labor migration and the illegality spiral: Chinese, European, and Mexican indocumentados in the United States, 1882–2007’, American Quarterly, 60, 3, 2008, pp. 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

133 Smith, Marian L., ‘The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) at the U.S.–Canadian border, 1893–1993’, Michigan Historical Review, 26, 2, 2000, p. 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

134 Sydney Morning Herald, 22 July 1924, p. 9.

135 NARA, RG 85, 55431/840, 55431/840A, 55448/984, 55448/291.

136 Mercury (Hobart), 17 October 1925, p. 16.

137 NAA, A981/UNI26, Elder to Bruce, 17 April 1925; US Immigration and Naturalization Service annual reports, Washington, DC; TNA, FO 372/2680 and FO 1103/1894; Ethan Blue, ‘Strange passages: carceral mobility and the liminal in the catastrophic history of American deportation’, National Identities, 17, 2, 2015, pp. 175–94.

138 Reed, Cynthia, Lucky Alphonse, Melbourne: Reed and Harris, 1944, p. 26.Google Scholar

139 NAA, A981/UNI26, Elder to Bruce, 9 June 1925.

140 McKeown, Melancholy order, pp. 268–91.

141 NARA, RG 85, 55383/028A, Board transcript, 23 August 1927.

142 NARA, RG 85, 55383/028.

143 State Library of Victoria, MS7067, 395/5, ‘From coast to coast’.

144 Ngai, Mae M., ‘The strange career of the illegal alien: immigration restriction and deportation policy in the United States, 1921–1965’, Law and History Review, 21, 1, 2003, pp. 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

145 Smith, ‘Immigration and Naturalization Service’, p. 134; TNA, FO372/2678, p. 73.

146 Riskin, Robert, dir., When you’re in love, Columbia, 1937.Google Scholar

147 Rees, Anne, ‘“Bursting with new ideas”: Australian women professionals and American study tours, 1930–1960’, History Australia, 13, 3, 2016, pp. 382–98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Butler, Rex and Donaldson, A. D. S., ‘Against provincialism: Australian–American connections, 1900–2000’, Journal of Australian Studies, 36, 3, 2012, pp. 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

148 NARA, RG 85, 55383/028A, Board transcript, 23 August 1927.

149 Manifest, Olympic, 10 May 1922, www.libertyellisfoundation.org (consulted 29 November 2017).