Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T01:55:17.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the generation of swirling jets: high-Reynolds-number rotating flow in a pipe with a final contraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2011

Benjamin Leclaire  and
Laurent Jacquin
Benjamin Leclaire*
Affiliation:
ONERA, Department of Fundamental and Experimental Aerodynamics, 8 rue des Vertugadins, 92190 Meudon, France
Laurent Jacquin
Affiliation:
ONERA, Department of Fundamental and Experimental Aerodynamics, 8 rue des Vertugadins, 92190 Meudon, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: benjamin.leclaire@onera.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the generation conditions of a high-Reynolds-number swirling jet experiment, based on a rotating honeycomb device and using a final contraction. Using hot-wire measurements, we first show that for high swirl levels, the flow at the jet exhaust may exhibit fully developed turbulence in the whole plane. By analysing the fluctuation levels obtained for several values of the contraction ratio, ranging from 4 to 18.4, we prove that this turbulence does not result from upstream-propagating disturbances initiated in the jet, but originates in the pipe flow upstream of the exit plane. Using stereo particle image velocimetry, we then measure the flow in the constant-cross-section pipe located between the rotating honeycomb outlet and the contraction. This investigation is supplemented with simplified numerical simulations of the mean flow. The pipe flow dynamics is found to result from the interplay of a rich variety of complex phenomena, which are independent of the contraction ratio in the range considered here. In the near-wall region, centrifugal instability occurs in the form of intermittent azimuthal vortices, starting from moderate swirl levels and persisting for all higher levels. As the flow exiting from the honeycomb has a swirl level high enough to reach the subcritical regime, a complex mean flow organization is observed, dominated by the presence of large-amplitude axisymmetric Kelvin wave trains. Gradients in the resulting flow lead to the appearance of generalized centrifugal instabilities in an annular region in the rotational core, starting in the early subcritical regime. As the swirl level is further increased, large-scale, high-amplitude axisymmetric and simple spiral perturbations add to the global dynamics, leading to an overall very high fluctuation level. Consideration of the turbulent spectra in the jet exit planes suggests that the simple spiral coherent structure could be the resonant response of the flow to the periodic excitation by the rotating honeycomb. Overall, the study illustrates why a swirling jet experiment should exclude the use of a final contraction in order to guarantee smooth flow conditions in the exit at high swirl.

JFM classification

Wakes/Jets: Jets Turbulent Flows: Turbulent transition Vortex Flows: Vortex dynamics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 692 , 10 February 2012 , pp. 78 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ash, R. L. & Khorrami, M. R. 1995 Vortex stability. In Fluid Vortices – Fluid Mechanics and its Applications (ed. Green, S. I. ), pp. 317–372. Kluwer.Google Scholar
2.Barlow, R. S. & Johnston, J. P. 1988 Structure of a turbulent boundary layer on a concave surface. J. Fluid Mech. 191, 137–176.Google Scholar
3.Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
4.Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
5.Benedict, L. H. & Gould, R. D. 1996 Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exp. Fluids 22, 129–136.Google Scholar
6.Benjamin, T. B. 1962 Theory of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Billant, P., Chomaz, J.-M. & Huerre, P. 1998 Experimental study of vortex breakdown in swirling jets. J. Fluid Mech. 376, 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cassidy, J. J. & Falvey, H. T. 1970 Observations of unsteady flow arising after vortex breakdown. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 727–736.Google Scholar
9.Escudier, M. P., Bornstein, J. & Zehnder, N. 1980 Observations and LDA measurements of confined turbulent vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 49–63.Google Scholar
10.Escudier, M. P. & Keller, J. J. 1985 Recirculation in swirling flow: a manifestation of vortex breakdown. AIAA J. 23 (1), 111–116.Google Scholar
11.Farokhi, S. & Taghavi, R. 1988 Effect of initial swirl distribution on the evolution of a turbulent jet. AIAA J. 27 (6), 700–706.Google Scholar
12.Gallaire, F. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2004 The role of boundary conditions in a simple model of incipient vortex breakdown. Phys. Fluids 16 (2), 274–286.Google Scholar
13.Garg, A. K. & Leibovich, S. 1979 Spectral characteristics of vortex breakdown flow fields. Phys. Fluids 22 (11), 2053–2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Gilchrist, R. T. & Naughton, W. 2005 Experimental study of incompressible jets with different initial swirl distributions: mean results. AIAA J. 43 (4), 741–751.Google Scholar
15.Hoffmann, P. H., Muck, K. C. & Bradshaw, P. 1985 The effect of concave surface curvature on turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Jacquin, L., Leuchter, O., Cambon, C. & Mathieu, J. 1990 Homogeneous turbulence in the presence of rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 1–52.Google Scholar
17.Leclaire, B., Jacquin, L. & Sipp, D. 2007aThe generating conditions of a high-Reynolds-number swirling jet. In 5th Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena Symposium, Munich, Germany, Aug. 27–29.Google Scholar
18.Leclaire, B. & Sipp, D. 2010 A sensitivity study of vortex breakdown onset to upstream boundary conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 645, 81–119.Google Scholar
19.Leclaire, B., Sipp, D. & Jacquin, L. 2007b Near-critical swirling flow in a contracting duct: the case of plug axial flow with solid body rotation. Phys. Fluids 19 (9), 091701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lee, M. J. 1989 Distortion of homogeneous turbulence by axisymmetric strain and dilatation. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1541–1557.Google Scholar
21.Leibovich, S. 1984 Vortex stability and breakdown: survey and extension. AIAA J. 22 (9), 1192–1206.Google Scholar
22.Leibovich, S. & Stewartson, K. 1983 A sufficient condition for the instability of columnar vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 335–356.Google Scholar
23.Loiseleux, T. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2003 Breaking of rotational symmetry in a swirling jet experiment. Phys. Fluids 15 (2), 511–523.Google Scholar
24.Lucca-Negro, O. & O’Doherty, T. 2001 Vortex breakdown: a review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 27 (4), 431–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Mattner, T. W., Joubert, P. N. & Chong, M. S. 2002 Vortical flow. Part 1. Flow through a constant-diameter pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 463, 259–291.Google Scholar
26.Panda, J. & McLaughlin, D. K. 1994 Experiments on the instabilities of a swirling jet. Phys. Fluids 6 (1), 263–276.Google Scholar
27.Raffel, M., Willert, C. & Wereley, S. 2007 Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide. Springer.Google Scholar
28.Ruith, M. R., Chen, P., Meiburg, E. & Maxworthy, T. 2003 Three-dimensional vortex breakdown in swirling jets and wakes: direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 486, 331–378.Google Scholar
29.Saffman, P. G. 1992 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
30.Sarpkaya, T. 1971 On stationary and travelling vortex breakdowns. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 545–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Tropea, C., Yarin, A. L. & Foss, J. F. 2007 Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar