Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Gravity currents propagating into two-layer stratified fluids: vorticity-based models

  • M. A. Khodkar (a1), M. M. Nasr-Azadani (a1) and E. Meiburg (a1)

Abstract

The vorticity-based modelling approach originally introduced by Borden & Meiburg (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 726, 2013b, R1) is extended to gravity currents propagating into two-layer stratified ambients. Vorticity models are developed for three different flow configurations: no upstream-propagating wave, an upstream-propagating expansion wave only and an upstream-propagating expansion wave and a bore. For a given gravity current height and stratification strength, along with ambient inflow layer thicknesses and velocities, the models yield the gravity current velocity, the bore and expansion wave properties and the ambient outflow layer thicknesses and velocities. We furthermore establish which of the three configurations will occur in a given parameter regime. Since energy-related closure assumptions are not required for any of the configurations, we can determine the dissipation as a function of the gravity current height, for a given set of flow parameters. To investigate which gravity current height is selected in real flows, we carry out two-dimensional Navier–Stokes simulations for comparison. These yield gravity current heights close to the vorticity model solutions for energy-conserving flows. Hence we adopt these energy-conserving solutions as the vorticity model predictions. We subsequently discuss these predictions in the context of earlier models by other authors, and of two-layer stratified flows over obstacles.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: meiburg@engineering.ucsb.edu

References

Hide All
Baines, P. G. 1984 A unified description of two-layer flow over a topography. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 127167.
Baines, P. G. & Davies, P. A. 1980 Laboratory studies of topographic effects in rotating and/or stratified fluids. In Orographic Effects in Stratified Fluids, pp. 233299. GARP Publ. no. 23.
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31 (2), 209248.
Borden, Z. & Meiburg, E. 2013a Circulation-based models for Boussinesq gravity currents. Phys. Fluids 25 (10), 101301.
Borden, Z. & Meiburg, E. 2013b Circulation-based models for Boussinesq internal bores. J. Fluid Mech. 726, R1.
Crook, N. A. 1983 The formation of the Morning Glory. In Mesoscale Meteorology: Theories, Observations and Models (ed. Lilly, D. K. & Gal-Chen, T.), pp. 349353. D. Reidel.
Crook, N. A.1984 A numerical and analytical study of atmospheric undular bores. PhD thesis, University of London.
Crook, N. A. & Miller, M. J. 1985 A numerical and analytical study of atmospheric undular bores. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc 111, 225242.
Flynn, M. R., Ungarish, M. & Tan, A. W. 2012 Gravity currents in a two-layer stratified ambient: the theory for the steady-state (front condition) and lock-released flows, and experimental confirmations. Phys. Fluids 24, 026601.
Holyer, J. Y. & Huppert, H. E. 1980 Gravity currents entering a two-layer fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 739767.
Khodkar, M. A., Nasr-Azadani, M. M. & Meiburg, E. 2017 Partial-depth lock-release flows. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2 (6), 064802.
Kilcher, J. D. & Nash, J. D. 2010 Structure and dynamics of the Columbia River tidal plume front. J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans 115, C00B12.
Klemp, J. B., Rotunno, R. & Skamarock, W. C. 1997 On the propagation of internal bores. J. Fluid Mech. 331, 81106.
Lawrence, G. 1993 The hydraulics of steady two-layer flow over a fixed obstacle. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 605633.
Maxworthy, T., Leilich, J., Simpson, J. E. & Meiburg, E. H. 2002 The propagation of a gravity current into a linearly stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 453, 371394.
Nash, J. D. & Moum, J. M. 2005 River plumes as a source of large-amplitude internal waves in the coastal ocean. Nature 437, 400403.
Nasr-Azadani, M. M., Hall, B. & Meiburg, E. 2013 Polydisperse turbidity currents propagating over complex topography: comparison of experimental and depth-resolved simulation results. Comput. Geosci. 53, 141153.
Nasr-Azadani, M. M. & Meiburg, E. 2011 TURBINS: an immersed boundary, Navier–Stokes code for simulation of gravity and turbidity currents interacting with complex topographies. J. Comput. Fluids 45 (1), 1428.
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1983 Gravity currents produced by instantaneous releases of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95110.
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1989 The formation of internal bores in the atmosphere: a laboratory model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 115, 941963.
Shin, J. O., Dalziel, S. B. & Linden, P. F. 2004 Gravity currents produced by lock exchange. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 134.
Tan, A. W., Nobes, D. S., Fleck, B. A. & Flynn, M. R. 2010 Gravity currents in two-layer stratified media. Environ. Fluid Mech. 11 (2), 203223.
White, B. L. & Helfrich, K. R. 2012 A general description of a gravity current front propagating in a two-layer stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 711, 545575.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed