Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:51:44.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combined influence of coating permeability and roughness on supersonic boundary layer stability and transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2016

V. I. Lysenko ,
S. A. Gaponov ,
B. V. Smorodsky ,
Yu. G. Yermolaev ,
A. D. Kosinov  and
N. V. Semionov
V. I. Lysenko*
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
S. A. Gaponov
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
B. V. Smorodsky
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Yu. G. Yermolaev
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
A. D. Kosinov
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
N. V. Semionov
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
†Email address for correspondence: vl@itam.nsc.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A joint theoretical and experimental investigation of the influence of the surface permeability and roughness on the stability and laminar–turbulent transition of a supersonic flat-plate boundary layer at a free-stream Mach number of $M_{\infty }=2$ has been performed. Good quantitative agreement of the experimental data obtained with artificially generated disturbances performed on models with various porous inserts and calculations based on linear stability theory has been achieved. An increase of the pore size and porous-coating thickness leads to a boundary layer destabilization that accelerates the laminar–turbulent transition. It is shown that as a certain (critical) roughness value is reached, with an increase in the thickness of the rough and porous coating, the boundary layer stability diminishes and the laminar–turbulent transition is displaced towards the leading edge of the model.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer stability Compressible Flows: Compressible boundary layers Instability: Transition to turbulence
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 798 , 10 July 2016 , pp. 751 - 773
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagaev, G. I., Lebiga, V. A., Pridanov, V. G. & Chernykh, V. V. 1972 T-325 low-turbulence supersonic wind tunnel. In Aerophysical Research, pp. 11–13. ITAM, USSR Acad. Sci., Siberian Branch.Google Scholar
Boiko, A. V., Grek, G. R., Dovgal, A. V. & Kozlov, V. V.2006 Physical mechanisms of transition to turbulence in open flows. Research Centre ‘Regular and Chaotic Dynamics’ Inst. Computer Research, Izhevsk-Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Braslow, A. L., Hicks, R. M. & Harris, R. V. Jr.1966 Use of grit-type boundary-layer transition trips on wind-tunnel models. NASA Tech. Rep. TN-D- 3579.Google Scholar
Braslow, A. L. & Horton, E. A. 1958 Effects of surface roughness on transition. In NACA Conference High-Speed Aerodynamics, NASA TM-X-67369. pp. 439–450. A Compilation of the Papers Presented.Google Scholar
Braslow, A. L., Knox, E. C. & Horton, E. A.1959 Effect of distributed three-dimensional roughness and surface cooling on boundary-layer transition and lateral spread of turbulence at supersonic speeds. NASA Tech. Rep. TN-D-53.Google Scholar
Capra, B. R., Boyce, R. R., Kuhn, M. & Hald, H. 2015 Porous versus porthole fuel injection in a radical farming scramjet: numerical analysis. J. Propul. Power 31 (3), 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chokani, N., Bountin, D. A., Shiplyuk, A. N. & Maslov, A. A. 2005 Nonlinear aspects of hypersonic boundary layer stability on a porous surface. AIAA J 43 (1), 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Driest, E. R. & McCauley, W. D. 1960 The effect of controlled three-dimensional roughness on boundary-layer transition at supersonic speeds. J. Aero. Sci. 27 (4), 261–271.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. V., Malmuth, N. D., Rasheed, A. & Hornung, H. G. 2001 Stabilization of hypersonic boundary layers by porous coatings. AIAA J 39 (4), 605–610.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. V., Shiplyuk, A. N., Maslov, A. A., Burov, E. V. & Malmuth, N. D. 2003 Stabilization of a hypersonic boundary layer using an ultrasonically absorptive coating. J. Fluid Mech. 479, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fomichev, V. M. 1995 Stability of the laminar gas boundary layer on permeable surface with a variety of suction systems. High Temper. Thermophysics 33, 245–251 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Fomin, V. M., Fedorov, A. V., Kozlov, V. F., Shiplyuk, A. N., Maslov, A. A., Burov, E. V. & Malmuth, N. D. 2004 Stabilization of a hypersonic boundary layer by ultrasound absorbing coatings with a regular microstructure. Dokl. Phys. 49 (12), 763–767.Google Scholar
Fomin, V. M., Fedorov, A. V., Shiplyuk, A. N., Maslov, A. A., Burov, E. V. & Malmuth, N. D. 2002 Stabilization of a hypersonic boundary layer by ultrasound absorbing coatings. Dokl. Phys. 47 (5), 401–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S. A.1971 Influence of the porous coating properties on the boundary layer stability. SO AN SSSR Procs., No. 3, 21–23 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. 1975 Effect of gas compressibility on the stability of a boundary layer above a permeable surface at subsonic velocities. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 16 (1), 95–98 (in Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. 1977 Stability of the supersonic boundary layer on a permeable surface with heat transfer. Fluid Dyn. 12 (1), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. 2014 Linear instability of the supersonic boundary layer on a compliant surface. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 2 (6), 253–263.Google Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. & Maslov, A. A. 1980 Development of Disturbances in Compressible Flows. Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. & Smorodsky, B. V. 2009 Linear stability of supersonic boundary layer on porous surface. In Recent Advances in Fluid Mechanics and Aerodynamics, Proc. 7th WSEAS International Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Aerodynamics (FMA-09), Moscow, Russia, 20–22 August, 2009, pp. 68–73. WSEAS.Google Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. & Terekhova, N. M. 2011 Linear evolution and interaction of disturbances in the boundary layers on impermeable and porous surfaces in the presence of heat transfer. Fluid Dyn. 46, 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. & Terekhova, N. M. 2013 Controlling supersonic boundary layer stability by means of distributed mass transfer through a porous wall. Fluid Dyn. 48, 761–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaponov, S. A. & Terekhova, N. M. 2014 Stability of supersonic boundary layer on a porous plate with a flexible coating. Thermophys. Aeromech. 21 (2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, W. D. & Probstein, R. 1959 Hypersonic Flow Theory. Academic.Google Scholar
Jones, J. J.1959 Experimental investigation of the heat-transfer rate to a series of 20-deg. cones of various surface finishes at a Mach number of 4.95. NASA Tech. Mem. 6-10-59L.Google Scholar
Kosinov, A. D., Ermolaev, Y. G., Nikolaev, N. N., Semionov, N. V. & Semisynov, A. I. 2007 On the measurements of the pulsation in supersonic boundary layer by constant temperature hot-wire anemometer. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research, pp. 81–86. Parallel, pt. 5.Google Scholar
Kosinov, A. D., Ermolaev, Y. G. & Semionov, N. V. 1999a About the ‘abnormal’ nonlinear wave phenomena in a supersonic boundary layer. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 40 (5), 91–98; (in Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosinov, A. D., Semionov, N. V. & Ermolaev, Y. G.1999b Disturbances in the test section of T-325 supersonic wind tunnel. Preprint 6–99. ITAM SB RAS, Novosibirsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kosinov, A. D., Semionov, N. V. & Shevelkov, S. G. 1994 Investigation of supersonic boundary layer stability and transition using controlled disturbances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research, pp. 159–166. ITAM, USSR Acad. Sci., Siberian Branch, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Lysenko, V. I. 1999 Experimental studies of stability and transition in high-speed wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 392, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasheed, A., Hornung, H. G., Fedorov, A. V. & Malmuth, N. D. 2002 Experiments on passive hypervelocity boundary-layer control using an ultrasonically absorptive surface. AIAA J. 40 (3), 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S. P. 2008 Effects of roughness on hypersonic boundary-layer transition. J. Spacecr. Rockets 45 (2), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terekhova, N. M. 2012 Nonlinear interactions of high-intensity disturbances in the supersonic boundary layer. Novosibirsk State Univ. Trans.: Phys. 7 (1), 38–52.Google Scholar
Zhigulev, V. N. & Tumin, A. M.1987 The Origin of Turbulence. Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar