Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-7x8lp Total loading time: 2.468 Render date: 2021-02-24T19:13:45.944Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

A bathtub vortex under the influence of a protruding cylinder in a rotating tank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2013

Yin-Chung Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Shih-Lin Huang
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Zi-Ya Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Chien-Cheng Chang
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Chin-Chou Chu
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Corresponding

Abstract

Numerical simulations and laboratory experiments were jointly conducted to investigate a bathtub vortex under the influence of a protruding cylinder in a rotating tank. In the set-up, a central drain hole is placed at the bottom of the tank and a top-down cylinder is suspended from the rigid top lid, with fluid supplied from the sidewall for mass conservation. The cylinder is protruded to produce the Taylor column effect. The flow pattern depends on the Rossby number ( $\mathit{Ro}= U/ fR$ ), the Ekman number ( $\mathit{Ek}= \nu / f{R}^{2} )$ and the height ratio, $h/ H$ , where $R$ is the radius of the cylinder, $f$ is the Coriolis parameter, $\nu $ is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid, $h$ is the vertical length of the cylinder and $H$ is the height of the tank. It is found appropriate to choose $U$ to be the average inflow velocity of fluid entering the column beneath the cylinder. Steady-state solutions obtained by numerically solving the Navier–Stokes equations in the rotating frame are shown to have a good agreement with flow visualizations and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) measurements. It is known that at $\mathit{Ro}\sim 1{0}^{- 2} $ , the central downward flow surrounded by the neighbouring Ekman pumping forms a classic one-celled bathtub vortex structure when there is no protruding cylinder ( $h/ H= 0$ ). The influence of a suspended cylinder ( $h/ H\not = 0$ ) leads to several findings. The bathtub vortex exhibits an interesting two-celled structure with an inner Ekman pumping (EP) and an outer up-drafting motion, termed Taylor upwelling (TU). The two regions of up-drafting motion are separated by a notable finite-thickness structure, identified as a (thin-walled) Taylor column. The thickness ${ \delta }_{T}^{\ast } $ of the Taylor column is found to be well correlated to the height ratio and the Ekman number by ${\delta }_{T} = { \delta }_{T}^{\ast } / R= {(1- h/ H)}^{- 0. 32} {\mathit{Ek}}^{0. 095} $ . The Taylor column presents a barrier to the fluid flow such that the fluid from the inlet may only flow into the inner region through the narrow gaps, one above the Taylor column and one beneath it (conveniently called Ekman gaps). As a result, five types of routes along which the fluid may flow to and exit at the drain hole could be identified for the multi-celled vortex structure. Moreover, the flow rates associated with the five routes were calculated and compared to help understand the relative importance of the component flow structures. The weaker influence of the Taylor column effect on the bathtub vortex at $\mathit{Ro}\sim 1$ or even higher $\mathit{Ro}\sim 1{0}^{2} $ is also discussed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Andersen, A., Bohr, T., Stenum, B., Juul Rasmussen, J. & Lautrup, B. 2003 Anatomy of a bathtub vortex. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 104502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, A., Bohr, T., Stenum, B., Juul Rasmussen, J. & Lautrup, B. 2006 The bathtub vortex in a rotating container. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 121146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, A., Lautrup, B. & Bohr, T. 2003 An averaging method for nonlinear laminar Ekman layers. J. Fluid Mech. 487, 8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy-Knights, P. G. 1970 An unsteady two-celled vortex solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 673687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøhling, L., Andersen, A. & Fabre, D. 2010 Structure of a steady drain-hole vortex in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, D. L. & Davies, P. A. 2000 Laboratory studies of orographic effects in rotating and stratified flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 165202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, J. M. 1948 A mathematical model illustrating the theory of turbulence. Adv. Appl. Mech. 1, 171199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman-Roisin, B. & Beckers, J. M. 2007 Introduction to Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Physical and Numerical Aspects. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Echávez, G. & McCann, E. 2002 An experimental study on the free surface vertical vortex. Exp. Fluids 33, 414421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. R. 1972 The flow caused by the differential rotation of a right circular cylindrical depression in one of two rapidly rotating parallel planes. J. Fluid Mech. 53, 647655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. & Howard, L. N. 1963 On a time-dependent motion of a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 17, 385404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Heijst, G. J. F. 1994 Topography effects on vortices in a rotating fluid. Meccanica 29, 431451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, R. 1968 On source–sink flows in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 737764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, R. & Ibbetson, A. 1968 On slow transverse flow past obstacles in a rapidly rotating fluid (with the appendix by Lighthill, M. J.). J. Fluid Mech. 32, 251272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. L., Chen, H. C., Chu, C. C. & Chang, C. C. 2008 On the transition process of a swirling vortex generated in a rotating tank. Exp. Fluids 45, 267282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, A. P. 1969 Inertial Taylor columns and Jupiter’s great red spot. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 744752.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, S. J. 1964 The Taylor column problem. J. Fluid Mech. 20, 581591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugt, H. J. 1996 Introduction to Vortex Theory. Vortex Flow Press.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. S. 1985 The vortical flow above the drain-hole in a rotating vessel. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 381412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. & Drucker, R. 1997 The effect of possible Taylor columns on the summer ice retreat in the Chukchi Sea. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 1047310482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1969 The structure of free vertical shear layers in a rotating fluid and the motion produced by a slowly rising body. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 264, 597634.Google Scholar
Noguchi, T., Yukimoto, S., Kimura, R. & Niino, H. 2003 Structure and instability of sink vortex. Proceedings of PSFVIP-4, F4080. (http://psfvip4.univ-fcomte.fr/Fpsfvip4/).Google Scholar
Owen, J. M., Pincombe, J. R. & Rogers, R. H. 1985 Source–sink flow inside a rotating cylindrical cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 233265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedlosky, J. 1987 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudman, J. 1916 On the motion of solids in a liquid possessing vorticity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 92, 408424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanyants, Y. A. & Yeoh, G. H. 2008 Stationary bathtub vortices and a critical regime of liquid discharge. J. Fluid Mech. 604, 7798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1957 On almost rigid rotations. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1966 On almost rigid rotations. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 131144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. D. 1959 A two-cell vortex solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Aerosp. Sci. 26, 767768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1923 Experiments on the motion of solid bodies in rotating fluids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 104, 213218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukimoto, S., Niino, H., Noguchi, T., Kimura, R. & Moulin, F. Y. 2010 Structure of a bathtub vortex: importance of the bottom boundary layer. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 24, 323327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 154 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A bathtub vortex under the influence of a protruding cylinder in a rotating tank
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

A bathtub vortex under the influence of a protruding cylinder in a rotating tank
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

A bathtub vortex under the influence of a protruding cylinder in a rotating tank
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *