Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:17:40.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unseasoned Equity Financing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Robert M. Bear  and
Anthony J. Curley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

New stock financing is assuming increasing significance as a source of funds for private firms. The problem of management of external financing has grown as well. As a practical matter, financial managers must depend on the assistance of underwriters with respect to pricing and distribution of new corporate stock. But recent changes, some set in the context of the capital asset pricing model, imply systematic underpricing of new securities. If these charges are true, the financial manager is faced with the dilemma of paying monopsony profits, or accepting the cost and risk involved in taking the issue to market without the investment banker, or seeking an alternative source of funds. In any event, the process of marketing new equity depends on the relationship among the many characteristics unique to the firm and that firm's cost of equity capital. This paper discussed these interrelated issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 311 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Beaver, William; Kettler, Paul; and Scholes, Myron. “The Association between Market Determined and Accounting Determined Risk Measures.” The Recounting Review, vol. 45 (October 1970), pp. 654–682.Google Scholar
[2]Breen, William, and Lerner, Eugene. “Corporate Financial Strategies and Market Measures of Risk and Return.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 28 (May 1973), pp. 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Brown, J. M. “Post-Offering Experience of Companies Going Public.” Journal of Business, vol. 43 (January 1970), pp. 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fama, Eugene; Fisher, Lawrence; Jensen, Michael; and Roll, Richard. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review, vol. 10 (February 1969), pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Friend, I. et al. Investment Banking and the New Issues Market. Cleveland, Ohio: The World Publishing Company, 1967.Google Scholar
[6]Gonedes, Nicholas. “Evidence on the Information Content of Accounting Numbers: Accounting-Based and Market-Based Estimates of Systematic Risk.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 8 (June 1973), pp. 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Jacobs, D.; Farwell, L.; and Neave, E.. Financial Institutions. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
[8]Logue, Dennis E. “On the Pricing of Unseasoned Equity Issues: 1965–1969.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 8 (January 1973), pp. 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]McDonald, J. G., and Fisher, A. K.. “New Issue Stock Pricing Behavior.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 27 (March 1972), pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
[10]Reilly, F. K., and Hatfield, K.. “Investors Experience with New Stock Issues.” Financial Analysts Journal, September–October 1969, pp. 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Reilly, F. K. “Further Evidence on Short-Run Results for New Issue Investors.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 8 (January 1973), pp. 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Stoll, Hans, and Curley, Anthony. “Small Business and the New Issues Market for Equities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 8 (September 1970), pp. 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar