Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T13:53:58.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Stationary Distribution of Returns and Portfolio Separation in Capital Markets: A Fundamental Contradiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

In a general equilibrium model of risky assets, prices would be determined by the interaction of the supply and demand. Unpredictable events would impact one or both sides of the asset market and thereby influence the return on assets. The probability distribution of returns would thus be endogenous. Since expectations as to subsequent asset returns influence asset demand, the probability distribution of returns is a crucial element in the general equilibrium system; it is the consequence of the demand and supply of assets and, at the same time, a central determinant of expectations and, hence, of the demand for assets. Nevertheless, it is possible to undertake a partial equilibrium analysis in which the behavior of asset demand, conditional upon a postulated probability distribution of returns, is examined. In such a limited context, it is natural to postulate a “convenient” probability distribution of returns, namely, one that facilitates the analysis of demand. A leading assumption has been that returns are serially independent and obey a stationary distribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cass, D., and Stiglitz, J. E.. “The Structure of Investor Preferences and Asset Returns, and Separability in Portfolio Allocation: A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Mutual Funds.” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 2 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hakansson, N.Optimal Entrepreneurial Decision in a Completely Stochastic Environment.” Management Science, vol. 17 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Merton, R. C.Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case.” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 51 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Merton, R. C.Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 3 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Merton, R. C.An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Econometrica, vol. 40 (1972).Google Scholar
[6]Tobin, J.Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 25 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar