Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:31:57.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Simplified Jump Process for Common Stock Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

The specification of a statistical distribution which accurately models the behavior of stock returns continues to be a salient issue in financial economics. With the introduction of arithmetic and geometric Brownian motion models, much attention has recently focused on a Poisson mixture of distributions as an appropriate specification of stock returns. For example, see [12], [3], [8], [10], [5], and [1]. Consistent with empirical evidence, these models yield leptokurtic security return distributions and, furthermore, the specification has much economic intuition. In particular, one may always decompose the total change in stock price into “normal” and “abnormal” components. The “normal” change may be due to variation in capitalization rates, a temporary imbalance between supply and demand, or the receipt of any other information which causes marginal price changes. This component is modelled as a lognormal diffusion process. The “abnormal” change is due to the receipt of any information which causes a more than marginal change in the price of the stock and is usually modeled as a Poisson process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Beckers, Stan. “A Note on Estimating the Parameters of the Diffusion-Jump Model of Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 16 (03 1981), pp. 127140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 (05/06 1973), pp. 637653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cox, J. C, and Ross, S. A.. “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 4 (01/03 1976), pp. 145166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cramer, H.Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1946).Google Scholar
[5]Fehr, David W., and Rosenfeld, Eric. “Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimation for Stochastic Processes.” Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University (1979).Google Scholar
[6]Feller, W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1970).Google Scholar
[7]Karlin, S., and Taylor, H.. A First Course in Stochastic Processes, NY: Academic Press (1975).Google Scholar
[8]Merton, R. C.Option Pricing When Underlying Stock Returns Are Discontinuous.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, (01/03 1976), pp. 125144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kendall, M. G., and Stuart, A.. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, London: Griffin and Co. (1969).Google Scholar
[10]Oldfield, G.; Rogalski, R.; and Jarrow, R.. “An Autoregressive Jump Process for Common Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5, (12 1977), pp. 389418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ortega, J. M. and Rheinbolt, W. C.. Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables, NY: Academic Press (1970).Google Scholar
[12]Press, S. J.A Compound Events Model for Security Prices.” Journal of Business, Vol. 40, (07 1967), pp. 317335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Rao, C. R.Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1965).Google Scholar
[14]Wilks, S. S.Shortest Average Confidence Intervals from Large Samples.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 9 (09 1938), pp. 166175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar