Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T20:09:24.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relative Valuation of American Currency Spot and Futures Options: Theory and Empirical Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Joseph P. Ogden  and
Alan L. Tucker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study empirically tests contingent claims pricing models for American currency spot and futures options. Numerical analysis indicates that the difference in the model prices of spot and futures put (call) options (with the same exercise price and maturity) is, for a premium (discount) currency, positive and an increasing function of (a) the absolute difference in the prices of the underlying spot and futures contracts and (b) the maturity of the options. Tests on British pound, Deutsche mark, and Swiss franc options indicate many violations of the ordinal pricing relationships noted above. Additional tests indicate that option prices are inconsistent with functional relationship (b) above. Most of the observed violations are sufficiently large to provide arbitrage profits net of transaction costs, assuming interest rates are constant and the Interest Rate Parity theorem holds continuously. Alternatively, both the violations and the inconsistent functional relationship may be due to violation of the assumption of constant interest rates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 351 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Referecnes

Ball, C., and Torous, W.. “Futures Options and the Volatility of Futures Prices.” Journal of Finance, 41 (09 1986), 857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biger, N., and Hull, J.. “The Valuation of Currency Options.” Financial Management, 12 (Spring 1983), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. “The Pricing of Commodity Contracts.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4 (01/03 1976), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodurtha, J., and Courtadon, G.. “Tests of the American Option Pricing Model on the Foreign Currency Options Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22 (06 1987), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodurtha, J., and Courtadon, G.. “Efficiency Tests of the Foreign Currency Options Market.” Journal of Finance, 41 (03 1986), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, M.; Courtadon, G.; and Subrahmanyam, M.. “Options on the Spot and Options on Futures.” Journal of Finance, 40 (12 1985), 1303–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farber, A.; Roll, R.; and Solnik, B.. “An Empirical Study of Risk under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates.” In Stabilization of the Domestic and International Economy, Brenner, K. and Meltzer, A., eds. Amsterdam: North Holland (1977), 235–275.Google Scholar
Friedman, D., and Vandersteel, S.. “Short-Run Fluctuations in Exchange Rates: Evidence for the Data 1973–79.” Journal of International Economics, 13 (08 1982), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman, M., and Kohlhagen, S.. “Foreign Currency Option Values.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 2 (12 1983), 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrow, R., and Rudd, A.. “Approximate Option Valuation for Arbitrary Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (11 1982), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, J. “Foreign Exchange Option Pricing with Log-Stable Uncertainty.” In Recent Developments in International Banking and Finance, Khoury, S. and Ghosh, A., eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books (1987), 231–245.Google Scholar
McFarland, J.; Pettit, R.; and Sung, S.. “The Distribution of Foreign Exchange Price Changes: Trading Day Effects and Risk Measurement.” Journal of Finance, 37 (06 1982), 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, J., and Tucker, A.. “Empirical Tests of the Efficiency of the Currency Futures Options Market.” Journal of Futures Markets, 7 (12 1987), 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, K., and Sundaresan, S.. “The Valuation of Options on Futures Contracts.” Journal of Finance, 40 (12 1985), 1319–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. “Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly.” Industrial Management Review, 6 (Spring 1965), 41–49.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. “The Valuation of Warrants: Implementing a New Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (01 1977), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, K., and Tandon, K.. “Arbitrage Tests of the Efficiency of the Foreign Currency Options Market.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 4 (12 1985), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, K., and Tandon, K.. “An Empirical Test of a Valuation Model for American Options on Futures Contracts.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (12 1986), 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, K., and Wethyavivorn, K.. “The Valuation of Currency Options for Alternate Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Research, 10 (Winter 1987), 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, K., and Wethyavivorn, K.. “Pricing of Foreign Currency Options for Arbitrary Stochastic Processes.” Working Paper, Univ. of Pittsburgh (1988).Google Scholar
So, J. “The Sub-Gaussian Distribution of Currency Futures: Stable Paretian or Nonstationary?” Review of Economics and Statistics, (forthcoming, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A. “Empirical Tests of the Efficiency of the Currency Option Market.” Journal of Financial Research, 8 (Winter 1985), 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A.; Peterson, D.; and Scott, E.. “Tests of the Black-Scholes and Constant Elasticity of Variance Currency Call Option Valuation Models.” Journal of Financial Research, 11 (Fall 1988), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, R. “Valuation of American Futures Options: Theory and Empirical Tests.” Journal of Finance, 41 (03 1986), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar