Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T12:00:30.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Positively Weighted Minimum-Variance Portfolios and the Structure of Asset Expected Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

In this paper, we derive simple, directly computable conditions for minimum-variance portfolios to have all positive weights. We show that either there is no minimum-variance portfolio with all positive weights or there is a single segment of the minimum-variance frontier for which all portfolios have positive weights. Then, we examine the likelihood of observing positively weighted minimum-variance portfolios. Analytical and computational results suggest that: i) even if the mean vector and covariance matrix are compatible with a given positively weighted portfolio being mean-variance efficient, the proportion of the minimum-variance frontier containing positively weighted portfolios is small and decreases as the number of assets in the universe increases, and ii) small perturbations in the means will likely lead to no positively weighted minimum-variance portfolios.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bawa, V.; Brown, S.; and Klein, R.. Estimation Risk and Optimal Portfolio Choice. Amsterdam: North Holland (1979).Google Scholar
Best, M. J., and Grauer, R. R.. “Capital Asset Pricing Compatible with Observed Market Value Weights.” Journal of Finance, 40 (03 1985), 85103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. J., and Grauer, R. R.The Efficient Set Mathematics when Mean-Variance Portfolio Problems are Subject to General Linear Constraints.” Journal of Economics and Business, 42 (05 1990), 105120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. J., and Grauer, R. R.Sensitivity Analysis for Mean-Variance Portfolio Problems.” Management Science, 37 (08 1991a), 980989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. J., and Grauer, R. R.On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results.” Review of Financial Studies, 4 (1991b), 315342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, M. J., and Grauer, R. R.The Analytics of Sensitivity Analysis for Mean-Variance Portfolio Problems.” International Review of Financial Analysis, 1 (1992), 1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, I., and Blume, M.. “The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions.” Journal of Finance, 30 (05 1975), 585603.Google Scholar
Grauer, R. R.Normality, Solvency, and Portfolio Choice.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (09 1986), 265278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauer, R. R.Further Ambiguity when Performance is Measured by the Security Market Line.” Financial Review, 26 (11 1991), 569585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauer, R. R. “On the Power of Multivariate Tests of Mean-Variance Efficiency.” Manuscript, Simon Fraser Univ. (05 1989, May 1992).Google Scholar
Green, R. C.Positively Weighted Portfolios on the Minimum-Variance Frontier.” Journal of Finance, 41 (12 1986), 10511068.Google Scholar
Green, R. C., and Hollifield, B.. “When Will Mean-Variance Efficient Portfolios be Well Diversified?” Manuscript, Carnegie Mellon Univ. (1989).Google Scholar
Kandel, S., and Stambaugh, R. F.. “On Correlations and Inferences about Mean-Variance Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (03 1987), 6190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, J.The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (02 1965), 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley and Sons (1959). Reprinted, New Haven: Yale Univ. Press (1970).Google Scholar
Merton, R. C.An Analytic Derivation of the Efficient Portfolio Frontier.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7 (09 1972), 18511872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C.Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica, 35 (09 1973), 867887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C.On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (12 1980), 323361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlson, J. A. “The Asymptotic Validity of Quadratic Utility as the Trading Interval Approaches Zero.” In Stochastic Optimization Models in Finance, Ziemba, W. T. and Vickson, R. G., eds. New York: Academic Press (1975).Google Scholar
Pulley, L. B.A General Mean-Variance Approximation to Expected Utility for Short Holding Periods.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 16 (09 1981), 361373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, R.A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests; Part 1: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4 (03 1977), 129176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, R., and Ross, S. A.. “Comments on Qualitative Results for Investment Proportions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (05 1977), 265268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, A.A Note on Qualitative Results for Investment Proportions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (05 1977), 259263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W. F.Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, 19 (09 1964), 425442.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F.Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill (1970).Google Scholar