Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T22:30:39.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managerial Voting Rights and Seasoned Public Equity Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This paper examines the relation between changes in firm value associated with public equityissue announcements and management ownership, nonmanagement large block ownership, institutional ownership, information variables, and leverage. A significant negative relationis found between the ratio of announcement period abnormal returns to changes in management ownership and the level of management ownership. This result is consistent with Stulz (1988) who predicts that firm value increases at a decreasing rate as management control of voting rights increases. This finding is also consistent with improvements in alignment of interests, where such improvements diminish as management becomes entrenched. The announcement period abnormal returns appear to be unrelated to outside blockholdings (large block ownership or institutional holdings), information variables, or leverage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asquith, P., and Mullins, D.. “Equity Issues and Offering Dilution.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (01/02 1986), 6189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, J.; Lease, R. and Smith, C.. “Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 267291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S., and Mayers, D.. “Managerial Vote Ownership and Shareholder Wealth: Evidence from Employee Stock Ownership Plans.” Working Paper, Ohio State Univ. (1991).Google Scholar
Chaplinsky, S., and Niehaus, G.. “Defensive ESOPs and Shareholder Wealth.” Working Paper, Northwestern Univ. (1991).Google Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K.. “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (12 1985), 11551177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and Jensen, M.. “Separation of Ownership and Control“. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (06 1983), 301325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, J., and Sherman, H.. “Conflicts of Interest in the Proxy Voting System.” Research Monograph, Investor Responsibility Research Center, Washington, DC (1987).Google Scholar
Jensen, M.Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeover.” American Economic Review, 76 (06 1986), 323329.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., and Meckling, W.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (10 1976), 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J., and Lee, D.. “Insider Trading before New Equity Issue Announcements.” Financial Management, 20 (Spring 1991), 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasker, W.Stock Price Movements in Response to Stock Issuers under Asymmetric Information.” Journal of Finance, 41 (03 1986), 93105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland, H., and Pyle, D.. “Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance, 32 (05 1977), 371387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucus, D., and McDonald, R.. “Equity Issues and Stock Price Dynamics.” Journal of Finance, 45 (09 1990), 10191043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, M.; McCormick, R.; and Mitchell, M.. “Managerial Decision Making and Capital Structure.” Working Paper, Clemson Univ. (1990).Google Scholar
Masulis, R., and Korwar, A.. “Seasoned Equity Offerings: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (01/02 1986), 91118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W., and Partch, M.. “Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and the Issuance Process.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (01/02 1986), 3160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W., and Partch, M.. “Withdrawn Security Offerings.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23 (06 1988), 119133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M., and Rock, K.. “Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information.” Journal of Finance, 40 (09 1985), 10311052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 293315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S., and Majluf, N.. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (06 1984), 187221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, J.Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 237265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, M., and Williams, J.. “Estimating Beta from Nonsynchronous Data. Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (12 1977), 309327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (06 1986), 461488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R.Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (01/03 1988), 2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (05 1980), 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wruck, K.Equity Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: Evidence from Private Equity Financings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (06 1989), 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar