Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T08:30:23.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Explaining the Cross-Section of Returns via a Multi-Factor APT Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This paper uses an autoregressive approach to test a multi-factor model with time-varying risk premiums. A quasi-differencing approach is used to eliminate the unobservable factors in the model. It is found that the model is capable of capturing the “size effect” and the “dividend yield effect,” but is incapable of explaining the “book-to-market effect” and the “earnings-price ratio effect.” Thus, it is concluded that a constant-beta multi-factor model will not be able to explain the cross-sectional variation in expected returns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, R.Anomalies in Relationships between Securities' Yields and Yield-Surrogates.” Journal of Financial Economics, 6 (06 1978), 103126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banz, R. W.The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (03 1981), 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S.The Relationship between Earnings Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks: Further Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 12 (03 1983), 129156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, L. C.Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 43 (06 1988), 507528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., and Weinstein, M.. “A New Approach to Testing Arbitrage Pricing Models: The Bilinear Paradigm.” Journal of Finance, 38 (06 1983), 711743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.; Kleidon, A.; and Marsh, T.. “New Evidence on the Nature of Size-Related Anomalies in Stock Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics, 12 (03 1983), 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, E., and McElroy, M.. “Joint Test of Factor Sensitivities and Risk Premia for the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Finance, 43 (07 1988), 721733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y.Stock Returns and the Term Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (06 1987), 373399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. C; Chen, N.-F.; and Hsieh, D.. “An Exploratory Investigation of the Firm Size Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (09 1985), 451471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, L.; Hamao, Y.; and Lakonishok, J.. “Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan.” Journal of Finance, 46 (12. 1991), 1739–1764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, N.-F.Some Empirical Tests of the Theory of Arbitrage Pricing.” Journal of Finance, 38 (12 1983), 13921414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, N.-F.; Roll, R.; and Ross, S.. “Economic Forces and the Stock Market.” Journal of Business, 59 (09 1986), 386403.Google Scholar
Cho, C; Elton, E.; and Gruber, M.. “On the Robustness of the Roll and Ross Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19 (03 1984), 1”10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R.. “Risk and Return in an Equilibrium APT: Application of a New Test Methodology.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (06 1988), 255289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (06 1992), 427466.Google Scholar
Ferson, W., and Harvey, C.. “The Variation of Economic Risk Premia.” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (04 1991), 385415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gultekin, M., and Gultekin, B.. “Stock Return Anomalies and Tests of the APT.” Journal of Finance, 42 (12 1987), 12131224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G.; Kandel, S.; and Stambaugh, R.. “Mimicking Portfolios and Exact Arbitrage Pricing.” Journal of Finance, 42 (03 1987), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, D.; Newey, W.; and Rosen, H.. “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data.” Econometrica, 56 (1988), 13711395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegadeesh, N.Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security Returns.” Journal of Finance, 45 (07 1990), 881898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegadeesh, N.Does Market Risk Really Explain the Size Effect?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (09 1992), 337351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobson, J. O.A Multivariate Linear Regression Test for the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Finance, 37 (09 1982), 10371042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim, D.Size-Related Anomalies and Stock Return Seasonality: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 12 (03 1983), 1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim, D., and Stambaugh, R.. “Predicting Returns in the Stock and Bond Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (09. 1986), 357390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, B., and Modest, D.. “The Empirical Foundations of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (06 1988), 213254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, J.A Semi-Autoregressive Approach to the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Finance, 48 (07 1993), 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S.The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13 (07 1976), 341360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanken, J.Multivariate Tests of the Zero-Beta CAPM.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (09 1985), 327348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, R., and Trzcinka, C.. “Sequential Test of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A Comparison of Principle Components and Maximum Likelihood Factors.” Journal of Finance, 45 (12 1990), 1541–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (07 1980), 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar