Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T21:32:38.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CEO Selection and Executive Appearance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2022

Douglas O. Cook  and
Shawn Mobbs Open the ORCID record for Shawn Mobbs [Opens in a new window]
Douglas O. Cook
Affiliation:
University of Alabama Culverhouse College of Business dcook@cba.ua.edu
Shawn Mobbs*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama Culverhouse College of Business
*
smobbs@cba.ua.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Survey assessments have found limited evidence of benefits of executive attractiveness. We use an objective measure of facial attractiveness that is correlated with survey assessments but less noisy and identify several benefits from executive facial attractiveness previously found in the general population but heretofore empirically elusive among executives. We examine the effect of both measures on executive compensation, promotion to CEO and the corresponding shareholder reaction, and promotion to board chair. The objective measure identifies significantly positive labor market effects for executive attractiveness in all outcomes in contrast to survey assessments of attractiveness that do not correlate with any outcome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , June 2023 , pp. 1582 - 1611
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We are grateful to James Bates, Kathleen Centilli, Claiborn (Mac) Fountain, Kellie Hensley, and Katy Wallace for valuable research assistance. We have also benefited from conversations with and comments from Renée Adams, Anup Agrawal, Bruce Barrett, David Becher, Wesley Channell, Tony Cookson, Henrik Cronqvist, Jefferson Duarte (the referee), Daniel Greene, Daniel Hamermesh, Paul Malatesta (the editor), Bill Mayew, Amos Nadler, Micah Officer, Tijana Rajkovic, Jesus Salas, Geoffrey Tate, and seminar participants at The 2014 Financial Management Association Annual Conference, Georgia State University, Louisiana State University, the 2014 Mississippi State University Magnolia Finance Conference, the 2014 Northern Finance Association Annual Meeting, the 2015 European Finance Association Annual Meeting, and the 2016 Society of Financial Studies Cavalcade. Cook gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ehney A. Camp, Jr., Chair of Finance and Investments.

References

Adams, R.; Keloharju, M.; and Knupfer, S.. “Are CEOs Board Leaders? Lessons from Traits of a Million Individuals.” Journal of Financial Economics, 130 (2018), 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, E., and Mills, J.. “Opinion Change as a Function of the Communicator’s Attractiveness and Desire to Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1 (1965), 73–77.Google Scholar
Bashour, M. “History and Current Concepts in the Analysis of Facial Attractiveness.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 118 (2006a), 741–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bashour, M.. “An Objective System for Measuring Facial Attractiveness.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 118 (2006b), 757–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertrand, M. “CEOs.” Annual Review of Economics, 1 (2009), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, J., and Hamermesh, D.. “Beauty, Productivity and Discrimination: Lawyers, Looks and Lucre.” Journal of Labor Economics, 16 (1998), 172–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankespoor, E.; Hendricks, B. E.; and Miller, G. S.. “Perceptions and Price: Evidence from CEO Presentations at IPO Roadshows.” Journal of Accounting Research, 55 (2017), 275–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bognanno, M. “Corporate Tournaments.” Journal of Labor Economics, 19 (2001), 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, J.; Coles, J.; and Jarrell, G.. “Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 3 (1997), 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, A. W.; Huang, L.; Kearney, S. W.; and Murray, F. E.. “Investors Prefer Entrepreneurial Ventures Pitched by Attractive Men.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (2014), 4427–4431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buonaccorsi, J. P. Measurement Error: Models, Methods, and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudill, S. “An Advantage of the Linear Probability Model over the Probit or Logit.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 50 (1988), 425–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, J. M. “What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Application.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1993), 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. “Test “Reliability”: Its Meaning and Determination.” Psychometrika, 12 (1947), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Custodio, C.; Ferreira, M. A.; and Matos, P.. “Generalist versus Specialist: Lifetime Work Experience and Chief Executive Officer Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. T., and Jahnke, J. C.. “Unity and the Golden Section: Rules for Aesthetic Choice?” American Journal of Psychology, 104 (1991), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dipboye, R. L.; Arvey, R. D.; and Terpstra, D. E.. “Sex and Physical Attractiveness of Raters and Applicants as Determinants of Resumé Evaluations.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (1977), 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dipboye, R. L.; Fromkin, H. L.; and Wiback, K.. “Relative Importance of Applicant Sex, Attractiveness, and Scholastic Standing in Evaluation of Job Applicant Resumes.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (1975), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, J.; Siegel, S.; and Young, L.. “Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-Peer Lending.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 2455–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falato, A.; Li, D.; and Milbourn, T.. “Which Skills Matter in the Market for CEOs? Evidence from Pay for CEO Credentials.” Management Science, 61 (2015), 2845–2869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fechner, G. T. Zur Experimentellen Aesthetik [Toward an experimental aesthetic]. Leipzig: S. Hirzel (1871).Google Scholar
Foo, P. W., and Clark, M. C.. “Adult Age and Gender Differences in Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness: Beauty is in the Eye of the Older Beholder.” Journal of Genetic Psychology, 172 (2011), 162–175.Google Scholar
Fuller, W. A. Measurement Error Models. New York: Wiley (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, W., and Lewis, P.. “Beautiful is Good: Evidence that the Physically Attractive are More Socially Skillful.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13 (1977), 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. R.; Harvey, C. R.; and Puri, M.. “A Corporate Beauty Contest.” Management Science 63 (2017), 3044–3056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. Econometric Analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan (1993).Google Scholar
Greene, D., and Smith, J.. “How Does Acquisition Experience Affect Managerial Career Outcomes?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56 (2021), 1381–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guise, B.; Pollans, C.; and Turkat, I. D.. “Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Perception of Social Skill.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54 (1982), 1039–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halford, J., and Hsu, H. S.. “Beauty is Wealth: CEO Attractiveness and Firm Value.” Financial Review, 55 (2020), 529–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamermesh, D. S. Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People are More Successful. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press (2011)Google Scholar
Hamermesh, D. S., and Biddle, J.. “Beauty and the Labor Market.” American Economic Review, 84 (1994), 1174–1194.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., and Sprecher, S.. Mirror, Mirror… The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (1986).Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., and Saruwatari, L. R.. “When Beauty is Beastly: The Effects of Appearance and Sex on Evaluations of Job Applicants for Managerial and Nonmanagerial jobs.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23 (1979), 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermalin, B., and Weisbach, M.. “The Determinants of Board Composition.” Rand Journal of Economics, 19 (1988), 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, E. “Marquardt’s Phi Mask: Pitfalls of Relying on Fashion Models and the Golden Ratio to Describe a Beautiful Face.” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 32 (2008), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, T. S.; Kim, J. B.; Wang, R. R.; and Wang, Z.. “Seeing is Believing? Executives’ Facial Trustworthiness, Auditor Tenure and Audit Fees.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69 (2020), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamiya, S.; Kim, Y.-H.; and Park, S.. “The Face of Risk: CEO Facial Masculinity and Firm Risk.” European Financial Management, 25 (2018), 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.-H. “Easy Facial Analysis using the Facial Golden Mask.” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 18 (2007), 643–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kmenta, J. Elements of Econometrics. New York, NY: MacMillan (1971).Google Scholar
Little, A. C.; Jones, B. C.; and DeBruine, L. M.. “Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary Based Research.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366 (2011), 1638–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, J. R., and McCaffrey, D. F.. “Recommendations about Estimating Errors-in-Variables Regression in Stata.” Stata Journal, 20 (2020), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, S. R. “Dr. Stephen R. Marquardt on the Golden Decagon and Human Facial Beauty. Interview by Dr. Gottlieb.” Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 36 (2002), 339–347.Google ScholarPubMed
Mayew, W.; Parsons, C.; and Venkatachalam, M.. “Voice Pitch and the Labor Market Success of Male Chief Executive Officers.” Evolution and Human Behavior, 34 (2013), 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayew, W., and Venkatachalam, M.. “The Power of Voice: Managerial Affective States and Future Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobbs, H. S. “Is an Outside Chair Always Better? The Role of Non-CEO Inside Chairs on Corporate Boards.” Financial Review, 50 (2015), 547–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobbs, H. S., and Raheja, C.. “Internal Managerial Promotions: Insider Incentives and CEO Succession.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 18 (2012), 1337–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobius, M. M., and Rosenblat, T. S.. “Why Beauty Matters.” American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. “Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1985), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveen, L. “Organizational Complexity and Succession Planning.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41 (2006), 661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, M., and Newell, F.. “Familiarity Breeds Attraction: Effects of Exposure on the Attractiveness of Typical and Distinctive Faces.” Perception, 33 (2004), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravina, E. “Love & Loans: The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit Markets.” Working Paper, Columbia University (2019).Google Scholar
Rhodes, G.; Halberstadt, J.; and Brajkovich, G.. “Generalization of Mere Exposure Effects to Averaged Composite Faces.” Social Cognition, 19 (2001), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, K.; Marx, D.; and Samal, A.. “Computation of a Face Attractiveness Index Based on Neoclassical Canons, Symmetry, and Golden Ratios,” Pattern Recognition, 41 (2008), 2710–2717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, N.; Ungemach, C.; Harris, A. J. L.; Bartels, D. M.; Newell, B. R.; Paolacci, G.; and Chandler, J.. “The Average Laboratory Samples a Population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers.” Judgement and Decision Making, 10 (2015), 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, A.; Mandisodza, A. N.; Goren, A.; and Hall, C. C.. “Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes.” Science, 308 (2005), 1623–1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, D. J. Quantitative Data Analysis: Doing Social Research to Test Ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (2009).Google Scholar
Vancil, R. Passing the Baton: Managing the Process of CEO Succession. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (1987).Google Scholar
Warner, R., and Sugarman, D.. “Attributions of Personality based on Physical Appearance, Speech and Handwriting.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (1986), 792–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widgery, R. N., and Webster, B.. “The Effects of Physical Attractiveness upon Perceived Initial Credibility.” Michigan Speech Journal, 4 (1965), 9–15.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9 (1968), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Cook and Mobbs supplementary material

Cook and Mobbs supplementary material

Download Cook and Mobbs supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 158.5 KB