Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:11:21.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beta Instability When Interest Rate Levels Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John S. Bildersee  and
Gordon S. Roberts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Boquist, Racette, and Schlarbaum [3] and Livingston [6] show that a security systematic risk may be expressed as a function of its duration. These results have led to research examining the role of duration in explaining systematic risk, but Lanstein and Sharpe [5] indicate that Livingston's expression relies on the implicit assumption that extra-market covariances between securities are insignificant. Lanstein and Sharpe argue that such an assumption is unwarranted. They find a significant negative relationship between extra-market covariances and differences in duration between paired samples of common stock. Their paper suggests that duration may be associated with unsystematic risk and that any relation between duration and systematic risk is more complex than implied in [3] and [6].

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 375 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Blume, M. “Betas and Their Regression Tendencies.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30, No. 3 (06 1975), pp. 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blume, M. “Betas and Their Regression Tendencies: Some Further Evidence.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 1 (03 1979), pp. 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Boquist, J.; Racette, G.; and Schlarbaum, G.. “Duration and Risk Assessment for Bonds and Common Stock.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30, No. 5 (12 1975), pp. 1360–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Elgers, P.; Haltiner, J.; and Hawthorne, W.. “Beta Regression Tendencies: Statistical and Real Causes.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 1 (03 1979), pp. 261–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Lanstein, R., and Sharpe, W.. “Duration and Security Risk.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 4 (11 1978), pp. 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Livingston, M. “Duration and Risk Assessment for Bonds and Common Stocks: A Note.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, No. 1 (03 1978), pp. 293–295.Google Scholar
[7]Roll, R. “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory's Tests: Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2 (03 1977), pp. 129–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar