Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:19:57.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transformation of Industrial Apprenticeship in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Daniel Jacoby
Daniel Jacoby
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Washington, Bothell, WA 98122.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between the 1880s and 1930s, apprenticeship was transformed from an institution dominated by employers to one dominated by unions. Prior to this transformation, employers leveraged their ability to hire, fire, and discipline at will by requiring apprentices to post forfeitable performance bonds. Despite their financial interest in the resolution of contract disputes, employers who withheld employees' bonds judged their own cases. Agency theory helps explain the use and abuse of bonding schemes and their role in the subsequent transformation of apprenticeship.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 887 - 910
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adkins, v.Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 521 (1923).Google Scholar
Aichian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold, “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review, 62 (12 1972), pp. 777–95.Google Scholar
Alexander, Magnus, “Apprenticeship in the Metal Trades,” In Commons, J. R., ed., Trade Unionism and Labor Problems (New York, 1921), pp. 233–48.Google Scholar
Altmeyer, Arthur J., The Industrial Commission of Wisconsin: A Case Study in Labor Law Administration (University of Wisconsin Studies in Social Science and History, 1932).Google Scholar
Auchmuty, Richard T., “The Need of Trade Schools,” New Century Magazine, 11 (09 1886), pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
Beeman, Charles, “Some Practical Problems of the Organization of an Apprentice School,” in NACS, Proceedings (1914), pp. 377–78.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary, Human Capital (2nd edn., Chicago, 1964).Google Scholar
Becker, Gary, and Stigler, George, “Law Enforcement, Malfeasance and Compensation of Enforcers,” Journal of Legal Studies, 3 (01 1974), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, O. M., “Modern Adaptations of the Apprenticeship System,” Engineering Magazine, 32 (12 1906), pp. 321–38.Google Scholar
Bolino, August, A Century of Human Capital by Education and Training (Washington, DC, 1989).Google Scholar
Crombie v. McGrath, 139 Mass 550 (1885).Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul, “The Problem of Labor Turnover,” American Economic Review, 8 (06 1918), pp. 306–16.Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul, American Apprenticeship and Industrial Education (Columbia, 1921).Google Scholar
Edwards, Richard, Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Work Place in the Twentieth Century (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
Elbaum, Bernard, “Why Apprenticeship Persisted in Britain But Not in the United States,” this JOURNAL, 49 (06 1989), pp. 337–49.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard, “In Defense of the Contract at Will” in Epstein, Richard and Paul, Jeffrey, eds., Labor Law and the Employment Market (Brunswick, 1985), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Masonori, “Minimum Wage Effects upon On the Job Training,” American Economic Review, 72 (12 1987), pp. 1070–87.Google Scholar
Industrial Welfare Commission [IWC], Biennial Reports (Olympia, 1914–1918).Google Scholar
Jacoby, Daniel, “The Legal Foundations of Human Capital Markets,” Industrial Relations, 30 (Spring 1991), pp. 229–50.Google Scholar
Kizer, B. H., preface to Fleming, Samuel, The Story of Thomas A Edison Vocational School (Olympia, 1938).Google Scholar
Lazear, Edward, “Agency, Earning Profiles, Productivity, and Hours Restriction,” American Economic Review, 71 (10 1981), pp. 606–20.Google Scholar
Machinist Monthly Journal, August 1903.Google Scholar
Massachusetts, Law of 1865, chap. 270, section 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massachusetts, Law of Masters, Apprentices, and Servants (1901), chap. 155, Section 8.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Bureau of the Statistics of Labor, “The Apprenticeship System,” Thirty Seventh Report: 1906–1907 (Boston, 1907).Google Scholar
Massachusetts Commission, The Report of the Commission on Industrial and Technical Education (New York, 1906).Google Scholar
Minnesota Bureau of Labor, “The Apprentice System,” Fourth Biennial Report, 1893–1894 (St. Paul, 1895), pp. 127–384.Google Scholar
McMahon, Theresa, My Story (Unpublished Manuscript, University of Washington Archive, 1959).Google Scholar
Moran, Robert, “Autobiography,” Marine Digest, December 26, 1942, and January 16, 1943.Google Scholar
Morris, Richard B., Government and Labor in Early America (New York, 1965).Google Scholar
National Association of Corporation Schools [NACS], Proceedings (New York, 1914 to 1921).Google Scholar
National Personnel Association, “Discussion of Committee Report,” Supplement to the Report of the Committee on Trade Apprenticeship, Bulletin No. 18 (New York, 1922).Google Scholar
New York Technical College Archive, Account Books, New York Trades Schools (1906–1907 and 1912–1913).Google Scholar
Putnam Machine Co. v. Mustakangas, 236 Mass 376 (1920).Google Scholar
Reed, Anne Y., Seattle Children in School and Industry (Seattle, 1914).Google Scholar
Rorabaugh, William, The Craft Apprentice From Franklin to the Machine Age in America (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Rottenberg, Simon, “On the Irrelevance of Apprentice/Journeyman Restrictions,” Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 24 (06 1961), pp. 384–86.Google Scholar
Seattle Union Record, various issues.Google Scholar
Sikes, George, “The Apprentice System in the Building Trades,” Journal of Political Economy, 2 (06 1894), pp. 397–423.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, William, “Internal Labor Markets before World War I: On-the-Job Training and Employee Promotion,” Explorations in Economic History, 25 (10 1988), pp. 424–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Tenth Census of the United States (Washington, DC, 1880); Eleventh Census (1890); Twelfth Census (1900); Thirteenth Census (1910); Fourteenth Census (1920); and Fifteenth Census (1930).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, DC, 1975).Google Scholar
U.S. Commission, Report of the United States Industrial Relations Commission (Washington, DC, 1914).Google Scholar
Vauclain, S. M., “Proceedings of the Engineer's Club of Philadelphia” (1902), reprinted in Commons, J. R., ed., Trade Unions and Labor Problems (Boston, 1905).Google Scholar
Washington State Board for Vocational Education Papers [WSBVE], Washington State Archive (Olympia, various years).Google Scholar
Washington State Federation of Labor, Proceedings of the Annual Convention (Olympia, 1923).Google Scholar
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1936).Google Scholar
Wright, Carroll, “The Apprenticeship System in its Relation to Industrial Education,” in U.S. Bureau of Education, Bulletin No. 6 (Washington, DC, 1908), pp. 9–111.Google Scholar
Zieren, Gregory, “The Labor Boycott and Class Consciousness in Toledo, Ohio” in Stephenson, Charles and Asher, Robert, eds., Life and Labor (Albany, 1986), pp. 131–49.Google Scholar