Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:15:10.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medieval Economic Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Eric E. Hirshler
Eric E. Hirshler
Affiliation:
New York City
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nineteenth-century romanticism and the hardships of capitalist individualism have caused scholars to emphasize collectivistic social and economic institutions i n the Middle Ages. Carried to extremes by the English socialists, this attitude tended to ignore or even to deny the competitive aspects of medieval production. Church authorities and guild ordinances were often cited in support of the thesis that the era was noncompetitive. Even Sombart was able to see in the medieval craftsman and tradesman a petit bourgeois who typically held to the morals prescribed by church authorities.

Type
Research Notes
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Winter 1954 , pp. 52 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lopez, Robert S., “Still Another Renaissance,” American Historical Rei'iew, LVII (10 1951), 2Google Scholar. See also Evans, Austin P., “The Problem of Control in Medieval Industry,” Political Science Quarterly, XXXVI (1921), 601 fGoogle Scholar.

2 Sombart, Werner, Der Moderne Kapitalismus (Munich, 1922), II, chap. 6Google Scholar; Polanyi, Karl in The Great Transformation (New York: Farrar & Rinchart, 1944)Google Scholar, holds that the medieval market and its credit institutions were undeveloped and stationary. In contrast to this, see Kuske, Bruno, “Die Entstchung der Kreditwirtschaft,” Die Kreditwirtschajt (Leipzig, 1927), I, esp. 3 f.Google Scholar; Wege, Erich, “Wie Zuenfte als Traeger wirtschafdicher Kollektivmassnahmen,” Viertel-jahrschrift fuer Sozial und Wirtschaftsgcschichte, Beiheft 20 (1930), esp. 13–25; andGoogle ScholarKoehler, Erich, “Einzelhandel im Mittelalter,” Vierteljahrtchrift fuer Sozial und Wintchaftsgeschichte, Beiheft 36 (1938), 91 fGoogle Scholar.

3 Schumpeter, Joseph, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper & Bros., 1947). PP. 84, 85Google Scholar.

4 Loesch, Heinrich von, Die Koelner Zun]lurkunden (Bonn, 1907), I, 133. 149, 183, 185 #8; II, 101, 358, 366-67, 373 f., 456 511Google Scholar. See also Goering, Traugott. Handel und Industrie der Stadt Basel (Basle, 1886), pp. 257, 259-65, 293, 301–13. See alsoGoogle ScholarUrkundenbuch der Stadt Strassburg, eds. Witte, H., Wolfram, G. (Strasbourg. 1896), V, Pt. II, No. 434, 381Google Scholar; for competition between weavers and other textile workers, see Urkundenbuch der Stadt Strassburg, ed. Fritz, J. (Strasbourg, 1899), VI, No. 31, 23Google Scholar.

5 As early as 1309 there was a factor saroccarum in Cologne.-Locsch. Zufturkunden, I. xviii. The slow development suggests that there was some difficulty that had to be overcome if cotton were to compete with the other textiles. Both spinning and dyeing seem to have presented difficulties at first.- Crawford, Morris DeCamp, The Heritage of Cotton (New York, 1924), p. 6Google Scholar; Lecomte, Henri, Le Colon (Paris, 1900), pp. 280 fGoogle Scholar. In Strasbourg, cotton weavers and spinners worked for capitalist manufacturers during the fourteenth century.- Levy, Robert, Histoire économique de I'industrie cotonière en Alsace (Paris, 1912), pp. 1–3Google Scholar. Pure cotton cloth was quite common.-Loesch, Zunfturkunden, I, 149: II. 360 f.

6 Knipping, Richard, Koelner Stadtrechnungen des Mittelalters (Bonn, 1897), p. lxivGoogle Scholar. In Germany, unlike the English development, there was no de-centralization of the textile industry due to the fulling mill. The towns usually provided them.-Eliz. Cirus-Wilson, Mary, “An Industrial Revolution of the 13th Century,” Economic History Review, XI, No. 1 (1941)Google Scholar. But native woolens had not been able to meet foreign competition successfully.

7 Doren, Alfred, Deutsche Handwerker und Handuerkerbniderschaften im mittelalteilicfien Italien (Berlin, 1903), pp. 85, 93, 123–28Google Scholar.

8 The first documented evidence of silk dyen in Cologne is for 1356.- Ennen-Eckertz, Leonard, Quellen zur Geschichle der Stadt Kotln (Cologne, 1860), I, 157 f.Google Scholar;Koch, Hans, Getchichte des Seidengewerbes in Koeln (Leipzig, 1907), p. 16Google Scholar. They soon became a special branch of the dyeing industry.- Locsch, , Zunjturkunden, I, No. 19Google Scholar; Koch, , Getehichte del Seidengewerbes, p. 27Google Scholar.

9 Scholz, Richard, Aut der Getchichte des Farbstoffhandels im Mittelalter (Munich, 1929), p. 108Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., pp. 104, 110, 112.

11 Loesch, , Zunfturkunden, II, 107Google Scholar.

12 Geering, Traugott, “Koelns Kolonialwarcnhandel vor vierhundert Jahren,” Mitteilungen aus dent koelner Stadtarchiv, Heft 11, 54Google Scholar. Lauterbach, Fritz, Der Kampf des Waides mil dem Indigo (Leipzig, 1905), esp. p. 60Google Scholar.

13 For the necdlemakers, see Loesch, , Zunfturlkunden. II, No. 574, 344Google Scholar. For the cabinetmakers-carpenters controversy, see Urkundenbuch der Stadt Strattburg, IV, Pt. II, 204, 206, 213. Judicial decisions from the councils were sought; in Cologne the cabinetmakers lost.- Loesch, , Zunjturlyinden, I, exx; II, 395, 395-97, pp. 400–401Google Scholar; and in Lubeck the cabinetmakers won.- Wehrmann, Carl, Die aelteren luebeckjschen Zunjtrollen (Lubeck, 1864), p. 469Google Scholar.

14 The machine was invented in 1305 or 1306.- Doehner, Otto, “Die Entwicklung der Drahtherstellung,” Beitnege zur Geschichte der Technik. und Industrie, XIV (1924), 196–97Google Scholar; Doehner, Otto, Geiehichte der Eisendrahtindustrie (Berlin, 1925), pp. 25–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The wire drawers to which we are referring drew flat metal pieces into wire of about ½ cm. in diameter. Thinner wire continued to be drawn by hand.

15 Feldhaus, Friedrich M., Die TechnU der Antike und del Mittelaltert (Potsdam, 1931), p. 315Google Scholar; . Doehner, , Eisendrahtindustrie, p. 35Google Scholar.

16 For the English development, see Carus-Wilson, , “An Industrial Revolution,” Economic History Review, XI, 50, 55, 58Google Scholar. There seems to have been a spread of wire-drawing mills in the countryside- Doehner, , Eisendrahtindustrie, p. 38. For documentary evidence of complaints,Google Scholar See Loosch, , Zunjturkunden, II, 283, 285–86Google Scholar.

17 Ennen, Leonhard, Quellen zur Geschichte der Stadt Koeln (Cologne, 1879), VI, 541. See alsoGoogle ScholarFeldhaus, , Technik., P 338Google Scholar.

18 Loesch, , Zunjturkunden, II, 419Google Scholar; Koch, ,Geschichte des Seidengewerbes. p. 35Google Scholar.

19 Koch, , Geschichte des Scidengewerbes, pp. 35–37Google Scholar.

20 Loesch, . Zunfturkunden I, xlvGoogle Scholar. The shield makers, who were in the same guild as the painters, became painters when.shields became outmoded.- Ibid., I, 137; Schmidt, Benno und Bueclur, Karl, eds Frankjurter Zunfturkunden (Frankfort on the Main, 1914), I, 423 f.Google Scholar; Schuile, , Urkundenbiuh der Stadt Strassburg, V, Pt. II, No. 1261, 916Google Scholar.

21 The last time the spear makers are mentioned in Cologne is 1345.- Locsch, , Zunfturfywden, II, 279Google Scholar. In Strasbourg they seem to have maintained themselves until the last quarter of the fourteenth century.-Schulte, Aloys, ed. Urkundenbuch der Stadt Strassbnrg (Strasbourg, 1895), IV, Pt. II, No. 10, 213Google Scholar.

22 Sometime during the fourteenth century: they are mentioned in Strasbourg for the last time during the middle of the fourteenth century.- Urkundenbuch der Stadt Strassburg, IV, Pt. II, No. 12, 215. Perhaps they later joined with the coopers;

23 Korth, Ludwig, “Verhandlungen ueber die Hauswcbcrei im Kloster der Tertiarer zu Koeln,” Annalen des historischen Vereins juer den Niederhein, Heft 56, 180–88.Google ScholarLoesch, , Zunfturkunden, II, 323-25. 327, 465–70Google Scholar.

24 No craft guild restricted the number of its journeymen or apprentices voluntarily in Cologne until the revolution of 1396; see also Kelter, Ernst H., “Wirtschaftsgesinnung des mittclaltcrlichen Zuenftlers,” Schmollers Jahrbuch, LVI (1932), 756Google Scholar; Loesch, , Zunjturlkunden, I, 41, 45Google Scholar: Urkundenbitch der Stadt Strasburg, V, Pt. I, No. 571, 476; Frankjurter Zunftur kunden, I, 226, 227-28; II, 228.

25 Loesch, , Zunfturkunden, I, 46Google Scholar; II, 337; Stein, Walter, Akfen zur Geschichte der Verjtusung und Verwaltung der Stadt Koeln (Bonn, 1895), II, 614Google Scholar; Kuske, , “Entstehung,” Die Kredit-wirttchaft, I, 28Google Scholar. During the twelfth century the turners guild of Cologne tried to cope with the borrowing of raw material by its members.- Loesch, , Zunfturkunden, I, 34Google Scholar. Small amounts were apparently lent by the guild, but eventual payment was insisted upon. See also Schmidt, Benno, Frankfurter Amlsurkitnden (Frankfurt on the Main, 1915), pp. 349, 357Google Scholar; Fromm, Emil, “Frankfurts Textilgewerbe im Mittelalter,” Archiv fuer frankfurter Cetchichte und Kunst, 3d Folge, VI (1899), 56Google Scholar; Frankfurter Zunfturkftnden, I, 230, 266; Heimpel, Hermann, “Das Gcwcrbe der Stadt Rcgcnsburg im Mittelalter,” Vierteljahrschrift fuer Sozial und Wirt-tchajtsgeschichte, Beihcft 9 (1926), 216Google Scholar; Wege, E., “Die Zuenfte als Traeger,” Vierteljahrschrift fuer Sozial …, Beiheft 36 (1938), 13-16, 25–26Google Scholar.

26 In Cologne each weaver had only to pay an additional fee for each new loom.- Loesch, , Zunfturkitnden, I, 133Google Scholar. Th e smiths of Nuremberg had to pay an additional fee for each additional helper.-Baader, Joseph von, Kuemberger Polizeiordnungen (Stuttgart, 1861), p. 160Google Scholar. And, of course, many workshops were enlarged illegally.- Koehler, Eric, “Einzelhandel,” Vierteljahrschrift fuer Sozial …. Beiheft 36 (1938), p. 32Google Scholar.

27 The richer guildsmen seem, moreover, to have been able to evade the payment of fines.- Leiesch, , Zunfturkunden, I, xcix, cxxxiii, 120, 144Google Scholar.

28 Such credits were extended on the production of articles for mass consumption such as were produced by the smiths and other metal trades.- Baader, , Polizeiordnungen, p. 160Google Scholar; Kuske, , “Funtstchung,” Die Kreditwirtschalte. pp. 31 fGoogle Scholar. The fishing industry of Cologne wa s organized along these lines by the fourteenth century.- Loesch, , Zunfturkunden, II, 533, 534. See alsoGoogle ScholarBastian, Franz, “Das wahrc Geschicht des vorkapitalistischcn Kaufmanns,” Vierteljahrschrift fuer Sozial und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Beiheft 24 (1931)Google Scholar. Famous instances of regular factories were the copper and smelting works of Th. Venrath and the copper rolling mill of Jan Struys, both of Cologne.- Loesch, , Zunfturkunden, II, 304, 305, 306-7, 571 fGoogle Scholar. On the credit practices of the dry-goods merchants see Koehler, , “Einzelhandel,” Vierteljahrtchrift fuer Sozial …, Heiheft 36 (1938), pp. 91 fGoogle Scholar.

29 In 1355 the masons and carpenters demanded the exclusion of foreign masters, but the council of Culojjnc prevented such “discrimination.”-Loesch, Zunfturkunden, I, 177. In 1397, however, the masons and carpenters at the height of the reform movement succeeded in obtaining such exclusion.- Loesch, , Zunfturkfinden, II, 436Google Scholar. For estimates on how man y craftsmen were outside the guilds in Frankfort on the Main, see Buecher, Karl, Die Bevoelkerung der Stadt Frankfurt am Main in 14ten und 15ten Jahrhundert (Tubingen, 1886), passim.Google Scholar For further information on the conditions in the textile field, see Furger, Fridolin, “Zum Verlags-system als Organisationsform des Fruehkapitalismus im Textilgewerbe,” Vierteljahrtchrift fuer Sozial und Wirtschafttgeschichte, Beiheft 11 (1927)Google Scholar.

30 In Cologne there was no ban on the sale of foreign wares of good quality until 1435, with the exception of copper and tin wares on the plea of possible injury to public health.- Loesch, , Zunfturkunien, I, 21Google Scholar. The woolen weavers, with the exception of the year 1230, never attained the right to inspect foreign cloth for its quality.- Loesch, , Zunfturkjunden, II, 478Google Scholar; Schmoller, Gustav, Die Strastburger Tucher und Weberzunfl (Strasbourg, 1879), No. 50, pp. 104–5Google Scholar. After the second half of the fourteenth century many guilds were able to force on the importers inspection of foreign products for quality; this was probably done largely to prevent mixing of these goods with home products, thus altering the quality of the latter, and to prevent resale of foreign goods as wares of Cologne.- Loesch, , Zunjturkunden, I, 93Google Scholar; II, 3;;, 576; see also Ibid., I, 116, 169, 175; II, 255, 289, 423; see also Kochler, , “Einzelhandel,” Vierteljahrtchrift fuer Soxial …. Beiheft 36 (1938), pp. 48 fGoogle Scholar.