Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T20:32:51.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Tenure and Related Sectors of the Balkan Economy, 1600–1800*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Traian Stoianovich
Traian Stoianovich
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By The end of the sixteenth century, the tendency in the OttomanEmpire toward the expansion of timariote properties or military fiefs is reversed, and quasi-private properties begin again to acquire ascendancy in the Balkans. To understand die process of reversal, one must bear in mind the separation of die properties administered by die timariote into two distinct categories, die raya-čiftlik and the hassa-čiftlik The raya-čiftlik was die property over which die peasant tenant had rights of usufruct. The hassa-čiftlik was the private farm or “proprietary nucleus” of the timariote. Slowly the timariote expands his hassa-čiftlik at die expense of die raya-čiftlik. This is possible because certain peasants become indebted to timariotes, others sell dieir right of usufruct, some leave no legal heirs behind them, and others abandon dieir lands to escape plague or famine or to avoid a census, die collection of taxes, or armies on die march.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , Fall 1953 , pp. 398 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vladislav Skarić, “Iz prošlosti Bosne” (“From the past of Bosnia”), Godišnjak istoriskog druśtva Bosne i Herccgovine (hereafter referred to as GodiSnjak), I (Sarajevo, 1949), 8; Nedim Filipovic, “Carska zapovijed Besaretu” (“Imperial order to Bešaret”), Glasnik zemaljskog muzeja II Sarajevu, new series, IV-V (1949–50), 291. On the subject of the monetary and bureaucratic difficuties of the Ottoman Empire, cf. Hammer-Purgstall, Josef Freiherr von, Histoire de I'empire ottoman depuis son origine jusqu'à nos jours, trans, from German by Hellert, J. J. (Paris: Bellizard, Barthes, Dufour et Lowell, 1835-1843), X, 450–54Google Scholar; Braudel, Fernand, La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II (Paris: Armand Colin, 1949) I Pp. 418–19, 1043–44Google Scholar; Zinkeisen, Johann Wilhelm, Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches in Europa (Hamburg-Gotha: F. Perthes, 1840-1863), III, 763–805Google Scholar.

2 Gibb, H. A. R. and Bowen, Harold, Islamic Society and the West, I, Islamic Society in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1951), 188, 253, 255Google Scholar; Braudel, p. 639; Hammer-Purgstall, VIII, 44–46.

3 Braudel, p. 639.

4 Gibb and Bowen, I, 51, 254.

5 Zinkeisen, VI, 27.

6 Hamdija Kreševljakovic1, “Gradska privreda i esnafi u Bosni i Hercegovini” (“Urban industry and crafts in Bosnia and Herzegovina”), Godiśnjak., I (1949), 170; [Louis-Auguste] , Félix-Beaujour, Tableau du commerce de la Grèce, formé d'aprés une année moyenne depuis 1787 fusqu'en 1797, I (Paris: Impr. de Crapelet, year VIII), 52Google Scholar; Gibb and Bowen, I, 285, 295.

7 Solovjev, Aleksandar, “Nestanak bogomilstva i islamizacija Bosne” (“The disappearance of Bogomilism and the Islamization of Bosnia”), Godišnjak, I (1949), 65Google Scholar; Zinkeisen, V, 157; Fossés, Amédée Chaumette des, Voyage en Bosnie dans les annees 1807 et 1808 (Paris, 1822), Pp. 33–42Google Scholar; Djordjević, Tihomir R., Srbija pre sto godina (Serbia a hundred years ago) (Belgrade: Prosveta, 1946), pp. 153–54Google Scholar; Bajraktarević, Fehim, “Üsküb,” Encyclopédie de I'lslam, IV (Leyde-Paris, 1934), 1110–11Google Scholar; Boué, Ami, Recueil d'itinéraires dans la Turquie d'Europe (Vienne: W. Braumüller, 1854), I, 211Google Scholar; Braudel, pp. 271–72; French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Correspondance politique des consuls: Adrianople, I (1860–61), f. 135, letter of Tissot, French consul at Adrianople, dated October 8, 1860; Vojnović, Lujo, Dubrovnik. i osmansko carstvo (Dubrovnik and the Ottoman empire) (Belgrade: Državna Stamparija, 1898), I, 89Google Scholar; Bibliotheque Nationale (Paris), Fonds fr. 7176, Estat des places que les princes mahométans possèdent sur les côtes de la Méditerranée, I, 10–12. The outstanding example of urban growth in the period of general urban decline is Bitolj or Monastir, linked in the eighteenth century to the expanding commerce of Salonika, Durazzo, and Vienna.

8 Félix-Beaujour, I, 52.

9 Gibb and Bowen, I, 285n, 289.

10 Nenadović, Matija, Memoari (Memoirs) (Belgrade: Prosveta, 1947), pp. 42–43Google Scholar.

11 Archives Nationales (hereafter referred to as Arch. Nat.) (Paris), Affaires Etrangeres B III. 415, Observations sur la Moree, memoir attached to the letter of Butet, dated January 25, 1786.

12 Gibb and Bowen, I, 198, 256–57.

13 Busch-Zantner, Richard, Agrarverfassung, Gesellschaft und Siedlung in Südostcuropa in besonderer Berúck.sichtigung der Türkenzeit (Leipzig: Otto Hassarowitz, 1938), p. 68Google Scholar; , Ibrahim-Manzour-Efendi (Alphonse Cerfberr), Mémoires sur la Grèce el i'Albanie pendant le gouvernement d'Ali Pacha (Paris: P. Ledoux, 1827), pp. 343–47Google Scholar; review by Fougères, M. in Mélanges d'histoire sociale (1942), I, 118–19Google Scholar, of Wilhelmy, Herbert, Hochbulgarien, I, Die landlichen Siedlungen und die bauerliche Wirtschajt (Kiel: Schmidt & Klaunig, 1935)Google Scholar; Institut scien-tific]ue de I'histoire du peuple macédonien, Documents turcs pour I'histoire macédonienne. 1800–1803 (Skopie, 1951), pp. 11, 19, 23, 27, 35–36 (text in Slav-Macedonian, documents in Osmanli, summaries in French)Google Scholar.

14 Stadtmüller, Georg, Geschichte Südosteuropas (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1950), p. 346Google Scholar.

15 Mordtmann, J. H., “Derebeys,” The Encyclopaedia of Islam, I, Part II (1911-1913), 945–46Google Scholar; Gibb and Bowen. I, 193–94; Stadtmüller, pp. 345–46.

16 Cvijić, Jovan, La Péninsule balkanique (Paris: Armand Colin, 1918), pp. 112–26Google Scholar; Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B1. 906, letters from French consular agents in Morea, 1779–17X4, passim.

17 Busch-Zantner, p. 81; Barkan, Omer Lûtfi, “Čifluk,” Godi'snjak., II (1950), 288Google Scholar.

18 Busch-Zantner, pp. 81, 86.

19 Ibid., p. 107; Jena, Leonhard Schultze, Makedonien. Landschafts- und Kulturbilder (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1927), pp. 140–50Google Scholar.

20 Busch-Zantner, pp. 33, 92; Branislav Djurdjev, “Prilog pitanju razvitka i karaktera tursko-osmanskog feudalizma-timarsko-spahiskog uredjenja” (“Contribution to the question of the evolution and character of Turko-Ottoman feudalism”), Godisnjak, I (Sarajevo, 1949), 152–57; Ibrahim-Manzour, pp. 350–51.

21 Gibb and Bowen, pp. 257–58; Léo, Michel, La Bulgarie et son peuple sous la domination ottomane tels que les ont vus les voyageurs anglo-saxons (1586–1878) (Sofia: Editions d'Etat “Science et Art,” 1949), Pp. 109–11; Félix-Beaujour, I, 128–29Google Scholar.

22 Busch-Zantner, p. 106.

23 Ibid., p. 104.

24 Busch-Zantner, Richard, “Zur Kcnntnis der osmanischcn Stadt,” Geographische Zeitschrift, XXXVIII (Leipzig-Berlin, 1932), 4–6Google Scholar; Schultze Jena, p. 93.

25 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. BIII. 236, “Mémoire pour répondre à la lettre de Mgr. le comte de Maurepas en date du 22 octobre avec diverses observations sur les causes de la decadence du commerce français au port de Marseille,” signed de Maillet and attached to his letter of November 30, 1731.

26 Félix-Beaujour, I, 70–71; II, 163.

27 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Archives de la Marine B7. 452, table of cotton and cotton yarn imports entering Marseille, dated September 30, 1786, and table of French commerce in the Levant during the years 1782–1785, dated September 30, 1786.

28 Felix-Beaujour, I, 55–56.

29 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B111. 415, memoir on the cotton production of Macedonia, n.d.

30 Félix-Beaujour, I, 67.

31 Humlum, Johannes, Zur Geographic des Maisbaus (Copenhagen: E. Harck, 1942), p. 29Google Scholar.

32 , Kresevljakovié, “Gradska Privreda,” Godiśnjak, I (1949), 171Google Scholar.

33 Raicevich, J., Osservazioni storichc natural:, c politiche intorno: la Valachie, e Moldavia (Naples: G. Raimondi, 1788), p. 56Google Scholar.

34 Krcševljaković, loc. cit.

35 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B1. 484, letter from the Frenc h consul Isnard, dated October 2, 1716, at Durazzo.

36 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B 1. 172, recapitulation of boats loading and unloading at Arta during 1774.

37 Djordjević, Vladan, Crna Gora i Austrija u XVIII veku (Montenegro and Austria in the eighteenth century) (Belgrade: Drzavna Stamparija, 1912), p. 42Google Scholar.

38 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. BIII. 241, memoir on the cultivation of maize or Turkey-wheat in Morea, n.d. and no signature; for the name of the author and the date of the document, cf. Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B1. 472, Beaussier's letter dated February 3, 1787.

39 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. BIII. 241, memoir on the cultivation of maize; on the word galambochy, cf. Angelos Vlachos, Dictionnaire grec-franfais (Athens: P.D. Sakellariou, 1897), see kolampóki.

40 Kreševljaković, loc. cit.

41 Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B1. 947, fos. 65–66, 336, letters dated June 29, 1737, and May 9, 1755; Af. Etr. B1. 470, letter of March 1, 1763, signed Broucet; Af. Etr. B1. 906, letter of Ambassador Guy de Villeneuve, August 4, 1780; Archives de la Marine, B4. 272, fos. 96–97, letter of the chevalier de Ligondes, May 30, 1786; Stadtmuller, p. 363; Bibl. Nat. (Paris), Fonds fr. 10772, pp. 87–89, description of Ragusa; Arch. Nat. (Paris), Af. Etr. B1. 949, fos. 282, 416, 444, letters, of Desrivaux dated April 25, 1773, May 20, 1776, and December 27, 1777; Af. Etr. B1. 950, fos. 32, 56, 141, letters of Desrivaux dated April 5, 1779, December 15, 1779, and June 18, 1782. The above documents are on the subject of the Greek, Dulcignote, and Ragusan merchant marines.

42 Arch. Nat. (Paris), AF III, 75, dossier 306, description of the products of the Morea, communicated to the Directory on the 15th of Prairial, year IV; Af. Etr. B1. 864, letters of Clairambault, June 25, 1728, and May 16, 1730; Af. Etr. BIII. 235, memoir on the difficulties of importing grains from the Levant, February 1694; Af. Etr. BIII. 236, memoir on the grain trade in the Ottoman Empire, 1706; AF III, 75, dossier 306, extract from a letter of Fe'lix-Beaujour, 25 Fructidor, year IV; Af. Etr. B1. 996, letters of the consular official Thomas, dated June 20, 1740; Af. Etr. B1. 425, document attached to the letter of Castellane, September 28, 1746; Af. Etr. BII. 399, Villeneuve's letter of March 18,, 1729; Af. Etr. BIII. 285, 286, and 287, statistics on the entry of grains at Marseilles, 1756–1791; Archives de la Marine, B7. 167, letter to Villeneuve, January 22, 1740.

43 Bratianu, C. I., “Servage de la glèbe et régime fiscal. Essai d'histoire comparée roumaine, slave et byzantine,” Annales d'histoire economique et sociale, V (1933), 445–62Google Scholar; Angelescu, I. N., Histoire économique des Roumains (Geneva: Edition Atar, 1919), I, 309Google Scholar.

44 Struve, Peter, “Medieval Agrarian Society in Its Prime: Russia,” The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1941), I, 429–32Google Scholar; Mavor, James, An Economic History of Russia (2d ed., rev. and enl.; New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1925), I, 46–53Google Scholar.