Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:55:53.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor Supply, the Acquisition of Skills, and the Location of Southern Textile Mills, 1880–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Leonard A. Carlson
Leonard A. Carlson
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper offers the hypothesis that the development of the textile industry in the South was shaped by the fact that by 1870 most experienced workers lived in the Piedmont. Thus, a firm which wished to hire experienced workers would have been led to choose the Piedmont; similarly, mills producing more difficult finer count cloth would have chosen the Piedmont in order to hire experienced workers. Finally, the persistence of a virtually all white workforce may be explained by the fact that most experienced workers were white and would have resisted working in integrated mills.

Type
Papers Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 65 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wright, Gavin, “Cheap Labor and Southern Textiles 1880–1930” (unpublished manuscript, n.d.), 1–6;Google ScholarHekman, John S., “The Product Cycle and New England Textiles,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 (05 1980), 711–16.Google Scholar

2 Kohn, August, The Cotton Mills of South Carolina (Columbia, SC, 1907), p. 28.Google Scholar

3 Oates, Mary J., The Role of the Cotton Textile Industry in the Economic Development of the American Southeast: 1900–1940 (New York, 1975), p. 158.Google Scholar

4 Bureau, U.S. of the Census, Census of 1900, Vol. 9: Manufactures (Washington, D.C., 1902), p. 45;Google ScholarBureau, U.S. of the Census, Census of 1920, Vol. 9: Manufactures (Washington, D.C., 1923), pp. 178–79.Google Scholar

5 Chen, Chen-Han, “Regional Differences in Costs and Productivity in the American Cotton Manufacturing Industry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 55 (08 1941), 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Doane, David, “Regional Cost Differentials and Textile Location: A Statistical Analysis,” Explorations in Economic History, 9 (Fall 1971), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Bureau, U.S. of the Census, Census of 1900: Manufactures, p. 42.Google Scholar

8 Uttley, T. W., Cotton Spinning and Manufacturing in the United States of America (Manchester, UK, 1905), p. 58.Google Scholar

9 Oates, The Role of the Cotton Texlile Industry, p. 66.Google Scholar

10 See for example, Nelson, Daniel, Managers and Workers: Origins of the Factory System in the United States 1880–1920 (Madison, 1975), p. 90.Google Scholar

11 See Wright, Gavin, “Cheap Labor and Southern Textiles before 1880,” this JOURNAL, 39 (09 1979), 667–70.Google Scholar

12 Mitchell, Broadus, The Rise of the Cotton Mills in the South (Baltimore, 1921), p. 218.Google Scholar

13 Miller, Randall, The Cotton Mill Movement in Ante-bellum Alabama (New York, 1977), p. 20.Google Scholar