Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:36:17.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Development of American Laissez Faire1

A General View of the Age of Washington

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Frederick K. Henrich
Affiliation:
Buffalo, N. Y.

Extract

The pamphlet literature and the public documents of our early national period show that in spite of repeated instances of governmental interference in economic life, a great deal of thinking was being done along laissez-faire lines. This thought was unsystematic. It was pragmatic rather than philosophical, never doctrinaire, concerned primarily with defending and attacking specific measures of public policy. Nevertheless, it was serious thought, and in many instances had an important influence on legislative action. It was not restricted to any political group, but pervaded to a greater or less degree the thinking of all leaders of the community. Owing little to the teachings of contemporary European economists, American libertarianism deserves analysis as an indigenous body of theory, growing out of, and adjusted to American conditions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Tench, Coxe, View of the United States (Philadelphia, 1794), 66f., 143,441.Google Scholar

3 I am indebted to Mr. Curtis Nettels for the suggestion that there was a very close connection between occupational freedom and the abolition of entail and other restrictions on the free use of property. The true sense of the phrase laissez travailler might better be conveyed by the plea “give us a chance,” comprehending all ways in which men might be placed on a more equal footing and allowed to develop freely whatever resources they possess.

4 Adams, C. F., ed., The Works of John Adams (Boston, 1856), VIII, 294, [1780].Google Scholar