Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:33:19.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE ANTEBELLUM TARIFF: DIFFERENT PRODUCTS OR COMPETING SOURCES? A COMMENT ON IRWIN AND TEMIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2002

Extract

Doug Irwin and Peter Temin offer a welcome study of the tariff and American industrialization. Although largely overlooked, the tariff significantly influences our interpretation of early American industrialization. If the tariff had no substantial effect, as Irwin and Temin argue, we view early American industrialization quite differently than if the tariff induced industrialization by diverting trade to otherwise noncompetitive firms within a customs union, as I believe. Although I welcome attention to the tariff, I feel that Irwin and Temin's argument rests on a misconception of the British cotton industry and of the nature of potential competition between American and British cloth in the absence of protection.

Type
NOTES AND DISCUSSION
Copyright
© 2001 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)