¹ [Baxter, Richard], The judgment of Non-conformists of the interest of reason in the matters of religion, London 1676 (Wing B.1293), 1–2Google Scholar; Keeble, N. H., Richard Baxter, Puritan man of letters, Oxford 1982, 30–3Google Scholar. Isobel Rivers identifies different views of reason held by ‘latitude men’ and Nonconformists (chiefly Tillotson, Baxter and Bunyan), but does not place them in a political and polemical context: Reason, grace and sentiment: a study of the language of religion and ethics in England, 1660–1780, i, Cambridge 1991Google Scholar.

² Baxter, The judgment, 20. For dissenters on reason versus enthusiasm see Keeble, N. H., The literary culture of Nonconformity in later seventeenth-century England, Leicester 1987, 156–86Google Scholar. For earlier stress on the limits to reason in religion see Morgan, J., Godly learning: Puritan attitudes towards reason, learning and education, 1560–1640, Cambridge 1986, 41–61Google Scholar, though it is not clear that suspicion was confined to those identified there as ‘Puritans’.

³ Tillotson, John, The rule of faith, London 1666 (Wing T.1217)Google Scholar; Quantin, J.-L., The Church of England and Christian antiquity, Oxford 2009Google Scholar; Reedy, G., The Bible and reason, Philadelphia 1985Google Scholar; Mortimer, S., Reason and religion in the English revolution: the challenge of Socinianism, Cambridge 2010Google Scholar.

⁴ Haigh, Christopher, ‘“Theological wars”: “Socinians” v. “Antinomians” in Restoration England’, this Journal lxvii (2016), 325–29Google Scholar. See also Hirst, D., ‘Samuel Parker, Andrew Marvell and political culture, 1667–73’, in Hirst, D. and Strier, R. (eds), Writing and political engagement in seventeenth century England, Cambridge 1999, 146–8Google Scholar.

⁵ Haigh, ‘“Theological wars”’, 325–50.

⁶ More, Henry, Enthusiamus triumphatus, London 1656 (Wing M.2655)Google Scholar, 17, 55, and An explanation of the grand mystery of godliness, London 1660 (Wing M.2658), pp. vi–viiGoogle Scholar, 77, 408. See also Fouke, D., The enthusiastical concerns of Dr Henry More: religious meaning and the psychology of delusion, London 1997Google Scholar.

⁷ Thurman, Henry, A defence of humane learning in the ministry, Oxford 1660 (Wing T.1139), 8–9Google Scholar; Glanvill, Joseph, The vanity of dogmatizing, London 1661 (Wing G.834), 104–5Google Scholar.

⁸ Spencer, John, A discourse concerning vulgar prophesies, London 1665 (Wing S.4949)Google Scholar, sig. A2, 5; Stolzenberg, D., ‘John Spencer and the perils of sacred philology’, Past & Present ccxiv (Feb. 2012), 153–57Google Scholar.

⁹ Sprat, Thomas, The history of the Royal Society of London for the improving of natural knowledge, London 1667 (Wing S.5032), 366, 375–6Google Scholar, 428. For hostility to enthusiasm see Heyd, M., ‘Be sober and reasonable’: the critique of enthusiasm in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, London 1996Google Scholar.

¹⁰ Reynolds, Edward, The Lord's property in his redeemed people, London 1660 (Wing R.1263)Google Scholar, 12; Edwards, John, The plague of the heart, Cambridge 1665 (Wing E.209)Google Scholar, 8.

¹¹ Younge, Robert, ‘The victory of patience’, ‘Preparation to conversion’, and ‘The trial of wisdom’, in A Christian library, London 1660 (Wing Y.145), 123, 10–11Google Scholar, 15, and Carnal reason; or, The wisdom of the flesh, London 1669 (Wing Y.142)Google Scholar.

¹² Mall, Thomas, The axe at the root of professors miscarriages, London 1668 (Wing M.328), 43Google Scholar; Gale, Theophilus, The anatomie of infidelitie, London 1672 (Wing G.133), 136–7Google Scholar, 228; Baxter, Richard, The divine life, London 1664 (Wing B.1254), 241–2Google Scholar.

¹³ Reedy, Bible and reason; Redwood, J., Reason, ridicule and religion, London 1976Google Scholar; Sheppard, K., Anti-atheism in early modern England, Leiden 2015Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Stillingfleet, Edward, Origines sacrae; or, A rational account of the grounds of Christian faith, London 1662 (Wing S.5616), sig. b2, 250–1Google Scholar. For the debates over the reasonableness of Christianity see Spurr, J., ‘“Rational religion” in Restoration England’, Journal of the History of Ideas xlix (1988), 563–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁵ Stillingfleet, Edward, A rational account of the grounds of Protestant religion, London 1665 (Wing S5624), 178–9Google Scholar; Daniel Whitby used a similar argument: An answer to sure footing, Oxford 1666 (Wing W.1725), 5–9Google Scholar, 20, 25.

¹⁶ Baxter, Richard, The reasons of the Christian religion, London 1667 (Wing B.1367), 195–8Google Scholar, 241, 259.

¹⁷ Haigh, ‘“Theological wars”’, 329; Spurr, J., ‘The Church of England, comprehension and the Toleration Act of 1689’, English Historical Review civ (1989), 933–5Google Scholar. Simon Patrick later admitted that he had attacked Nonconformists in order to scupper the comprehension project: [Patrick, Simon], A friendly debate between a conformist and a Non-Conformist: in two parts: the sixth edition corrected and enlarged, London 1684 (Wing P.803)Google Scholar, sig. A4.

¹⁸ [Wright, Abraham], Anarchie reviving; or, The good old cause on the anvil: being a discovery of the present design to retrive the late confusions both of Church and State in several essays for liberty of conscience, London 1668 (Wing W.3684)Google Scholar; Quantin, The Church of England and Christian antiquity, 299–302. For an argument that ‘enlightened Anglicans’ represented the Church of England as offering a moderate, civil religion that served as a bulwark against a repetition of the chaos of the Civil War see Bulman, W. J., Anglican Enlightenment: orientalism, religion and politics in England and its empire, 1648–1715, Cambridge 2015Google Scholar.

¹⁹ De Krey, G. S., ‘The first Restoration crisis: conscience and coercion in London, 1667–1673’, Albion xxv (1993), 565–80Google Scholar; Scott, J., England's troubles: seventeenth-century English political instability in European context, Cambridge 2000, 365–73Google Scholar, 427–30.

²⁰ Spurr, J., The Restoration Church of England, 1646–1689, New Haven–London 1991, 55–61Google Scholar.

²¹ S. P., A brief account of the new sect of latitude-men, London 1662 (Wing P.754)Google Scholar. For caution about the ‘latitude’ label see Spurr, J., ‘“Latitudinarianism” and the Restoration Church’, HJ xxx (1988), 61–82Google Scholar: here the term is taken to signify an accusation rather than any firm association. For discussion of ‘latitudinarians’ and reason see Griffin, M. J., Latitudinarianism in the seventeenth-century Church of England, Leiden 1992, 60–88Google Scholar.

²² Rust's A discourse of the use of reason in matters of religion was not published until 1683, although he had died in 1670. Glanvill, Fowler and Rust shared More's interest in demonology, and More, Fowler and Rust had collected witchcraft cases for Glanvill's Saducismus triumphatus: Elmer, P., Witchcraft, witch-hunting and politics in early modern England, Oxford, 2016, 216–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Sherlock collaborated with Glanvill in An account of Mr Ferguson his common-place-book in two letters, London 1675Google Scholar.

²³ S. P., Brief account of the new sect, 3.

²⁴ For hostility in Cambridge towards those thought to be latitudinarians see Twigg, J., The University of Cambridge and the English Revolution, 1625–1688, Woodbridge 1990, 254–8Google Scholar; and Tyacke, N., ‘From Laudians to Latitudinarians’, in Tapsell, G. (ed.), The later Stuart Church, 1660–1714, Manchester 2012Google Scholar, 49.

²⁵ The Conway letters: the correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More and their friends, ed. Nicolson, M. H., Oxford 1992, 220–1Google Scholar; Beaumont, Joseph, Some observations upon the apologie of Dr Henry More, Cambridge 1665 (Wing B.1628), esp. pp. 179–82Google Scholar, where More is accused of having abandoned the Church of England.

²⁶ S. P., Brief account of the new sect, 6, 13; [Fowler, Edward], The principles and practices of certain moderate divines of the Church of England, London 1670 (Wing F.1711)Google Scholar, 8, 10.

²⁷ S. P., Brief account of the new sect, esp. pp. 7–11; [Fowler], Principles and practices, esp. pp. 36, 322–8; [Glanvill, Joseph], Lux orientalis; or, An enquiry into the opinion of the eastern sages concerning the praeexistence of souls, London 1662 (Wing G.814)Google Scholar, sigs A4–B, and ‘Anti-fanatical religion and free philosophy’, in Essays on several important subjects in philosophy and religion, London 1676 (Wing G.809), esp. pp. 16–17Google Scholar, 40–1; Rivers, Reason, grace and sentiment, 46.

²⁸ Samuel Ro[lle], A sober answer to the friendly debate, London 1669 (Wing R.1883)Google Scholar, sig. A4.

²⁹ Ibid. sigs A3–4; Baxter, Richard, Reliquiae Baxterianae, London 1696 (Wing B.1370), pt iii, 19–20Google Scholar, 39–40.

³⁰ Patrick, Simon, ‘A brief account of my life’, in The works of Symon Patrick, ix, Oxford 1858Google Scholar, 450. Patrick had opposed the Crown's nomination in a college election: Twigg, University of Cambridge, 247–8. A further reason for the attack on Nonconformists is suggested at the end of this article.

³¹ [Patrick, Simon], A friendly debate, London 1668? (Wing P.798), 5, 7–8, 206Google Scholar; A continuation of the friendly debate, London 1669 (Wing P.779)Google Scholar, 113, 232, 245; A further continuation and defence, London 1670 (Wing P.805)Google Scholar, 177. Unreason was not the only, or even the main, issue raised by Patrick, but it was a charge that particularly stung Nonconformists. For some of the response to Patrick see Winship, M. P., ‘Defining Puritanism in Restoration England: Richard Baxter and others respond to A friendly debate’, HJ liv (2011), 692, 697–8Google Scholar, 706–9.

³² [Parker, Samuel], A discourse of ecclesiastical politie, London 1670Google Scholar, vere 1669 (Wing P.459), 74, and at greater length in his A defence and continuation of the ecclesiastical politie, London 1671 (Wing P.457), 120–2Google Scholar.

³³ Owen, John, A brief declaration and vindication of the doctrine of the Trinity, London 1669 (Wing O.718)Google Scholar; Anon, , An humble apology for Non-conformists, with modest and sincere reflections on the Friendly debate and the Continuation thereof, London 1669 (Wing H.3402)Google Scholar, 143. Owen had been fighting against Socinianism since 1652: Mortimer, Reason and religion, 196–200, 205–12.

³⁴ [Owen, John], Truth and innocence vindicated, in a survey of a discourse concerning ecclesiastical polity, London 1669 (Wing O.817)Google Scholar, 313.

³⁵ [Glanvill, Joseph], A seasonable recommendation and defence of reason in the affairs of religion, London 1670 (Wing G.812), 1–2Google Scholar, 8–9, 12, 22, 24–7, and ‘The agreement of reason and religion’, in Essays.

³⁶ Idem, Philosophia pia; or, A discourse of the religious temper and tendencies of the experimental philosophy which is profest by the Royal Society, London 1671 (Wing G.817), 55–7Google Scholar, 67–8.

³⁷ [Fowler], Principles and practices, 42–5, 56, 93–6, 103, 113, and The design of Christianity, London 1671 (Wing F.1698), 274–5Google Scholar.

³⁸ Bunyan, John, A defence of the doctrine of justification by faith in Jesus Christ, London 1673 (Wing B.5507)Google Scholar, 8, 19, 22.

³⁹ Jacombe, Thomas, Several sermons preach'd on the whole eighth chapter of the epistle to the Romans, London 1672 (Wing J.119), 44–5Google Scholar, 109, 354–5, 400.

⁴⁰ R[obert] F[erguson], A sober enquiry into the nature, measure and principle of moral virtue, its distinction from gospel holiness, London 1673 (Wing F.760)Google Scholar, 137, 146, 154–6.

⁴¹ Faldo, John, Quakerism no Christianity, London 1673 (Wing F.302), 93–4Google Scholar; [Patrick], Friendly debate, 7.

⁴² Penn, William, Quakerism a new nick-name for old Christianity, London? 1672 vere 1673 (Wing P.1347)Google Scholar, 86.

⁴³ Faldo, John, Quakerism no Christianity, London 1675 edn (Wing F.303)Google Scholar, ‘The epistles of many learned and reverend divines’, sig. A4.

⁴⁴ Sherlock, William, A discourse concerning the knowledge of Jesus Christ and our union and communion with him, London 1674 (Wing S.3288)Google Scholar, 79, 212.

⁴⁵ Owen, John, A vindication of some passages in a discourse concerning communion with God, London 1674 (Wing O.821), 188–90Google Scholar. See Rehnman, S., ‘John Owen on faith and reason’, in Kapic, K. M. and Jones, M. (eds), The Ashgate research companion to John Owen's theology, Abingdon 2012, 31–48Google Scholar.

⁴⁶ Owen, John, Pneumatologia; or, A discourse concerning the Holy Spirit, London 1674 (Wing O.793)Google Scholar, sigs A2, C–C2, 186, 393. See K. M. Kapic, ‘The spirit as gift: explorations in John Owen's pneumatology’, in Kapic and Jones, Ashgate research companion, 113–40.

⁴⁷ Clagett, William, A discourse concerning the operations of the Holy Spirit, London 1678 (Wing C.4379)Google Scholar, 10.

⁴⁸ Ferguson, Robert, The interest of reason in religion, with the import & use of Scripture-metaphors and the nature of the union betwixt Christ & believers, London 1675 (Wing F.740)Google Scholar, 9, 56, 60, 62, 129, 152, 272.

⁴⁹ Glanvill, Joseph, An account of Mr Ferguson his common-place-book, in two letters, London 1675 (Wing G.798)Google Scholar, 2.

⁵⁰ Sherlock, William, A defence and continuation of the Discourse concerning the knowledge of Jesus Christ, London 1675 (Wing S.3281), 161–2Google Scholar.

⁵¹ [Alsop, Vincent], Anti-Sozzo, sive Sherlocismus enervatus, London 1675 (Wing A.2905), 277–80Google Scholar, 622.

⁵² Beddard, R. A., ‘Vincent Alsop and the emancipation of Restoration dissent’, this Journal xxxiv (1973), 161–84Google Scholar.

⁵³ [Baxter], The judgment, 1, 4–5, 9, 15, 17.

⁵⁴ Bates, William, The harmony of the divine attributes, London 1674 (Wing B.1113), 133–8Google Scholar, and The divinity of the Christian religion, proved by the evidence of reason and divine revelation, London 1677 (Wing B.1104), 186–7Google Scholar.

⁵⁵ Manton, Thomas, One hundred and ninety sermons on the hundred and nineteenth Psalm, London 1681 (Wing M.526)Google Scholar, 108, 110, 207, 531, 886. Manton had died in 1677.

⁵⁶ [Clifford, Martin], A treatise of humane reason, London 1674 (Wing C.4707), 2–3Google Scholar, 10–14, 16, 28–9, 30–4.

⁵⁷ [Stephens, Edward], Observations upon a treatise intituled Of humane reason, London 1675 (Wing S.5430)), 5–6Google Scholar, 11–12, 64–5.

⁵⁸ A[ndrew} M[arvell], Plain-dealing; or, A full and particular examination of a late treatise intituled Humane reason, Cambridge 1675 (Wing M.4B)Google Scholar, 10.

⁵⁹ Ferguson, Interest of reason in religion, sig. A4.

⁶⁰ Philologus, A seasonable discourse of the right use and abuse of reason in matters of religion, London 1676 (Wing S.2227aA), 2–3Google Scholar, 123, 147, 215.

⁶¹ Warly, John, The natural fanatic; or, Reason consider'd in its extravagancy in religion, London 1676 (Wing W.876), 18, 145–7Google Scholar, 162, 166, 214–15.

⁶² [Boyle, Robert], Some considerations about the reconcileableness of reason and religion, London 1675 (Wing E.42A), pp. xiii, xv, 11–13Google Scholar.

⁶³ Standish, John, A sermon preached before the king at White-Hall, Septemb. the 26^th 1675, London 1675 (Wing S.5216), 23–4Google Scholar; Tyacke, N., ‘From Laudians to Latitudinarians: a shifting balance of theological forces’, in Tapsell, G. (ed.), The later Stuart Church, 1660–1714, Manchester 2012, 49–51Google Scholar.

⁶⁴ Barne, Miles, A sermon preached before the king at White-Hall, October 17, 1675, London 1675 (Wing B.859)Google Scholar, 15, 21.

⁶⁵ Standish and Barne were both fellows of Peterhouse, Cambridge, where Gunning was Visitor, and Standish held a rectory in Gunning's diocese. Gunning certainly commissioned William Howell (or Hughes) to write against Clifford: W. H., The spirit of prophecy, London 1679 (Wing H.3346)Google Scholar, epistle dedicatory to Bishop Gunning at sig. A4.

⁶⁶ [Grove, Robert], A vindication of the conforming clergy, London 1676 (Wing G.2161), 60–1Google Scholar.

⁶⁷ Glanvill, ‘Anti-fanatical religion’, in Essays, 16–17, 20.

⁶⁸ The associated attack on alleged antinomianism was also muted: Haigh, ‘“Theological wars”’, 341–6.

⁶⁹ Owen, John, The nature of apostasie, London 1676 (Wing O.773), 8, 276–8Google Scholar, 284–7, 297–8, 300–2, 331–2.

⁷⁰ Idem, The reason of faith; or, An answer unto that enquiry, wherefore we believe the Scripture to be the word of God, London 1677 (Wing O.801), 1, 9–10Google Scholar, 11, 14, 90–1.

⁷¹ Idem, The doctrine of justification by faith, London 1677 (Wing O.739), 54–7Google Scholar, 296.

⁷² Arderne, James, A sermon preached at the visitation of the right reverend father in God John, lord bishop of Chester, London 1677 (Wing A.3625), 7–8Google Scholar.

⁷³ Webster, John, The displaying of supposed witchcraft, London 1677 (Wing W.1230)Google Scholar, 138, 201.

⁷⁴ Wilson, John, The Scripture's genuine interpreter asserted. London 1678 (Wing W.2903), 24–8Google Scholar, appendix 1–5. Wilson's identity and affiliation are unclear; he advances the same argument as Owen and refutes the charge of enthusiasm, but he cites with approval Bishops Reynolds, Taylor and Pearson, and the Homilies, and his book was licensed by Bishop Compton's chaplain.

⁷⁵ Owen, John, The causes, waies and means of understanding the mind of God, London 1678 (Wing O.809), 12–13Google Scholar.

⁷⁶ Flavel, John, Divine conduct; or, The mysterie of providence, London 1678 (Wing F.1158), 160–1Google Scholar.

⁷⁷ [Alsop, Vincent], Melius inquirendum; or, A sober inquirie into the reasonings of the Serious inquiry, [London] 1678 (Wing A.2914), 43–4Google Scholar, 48–9, 76–7, 111, 164.

⁷⁸ J[ohn] L[ougher], A treatise of the soul's union with Christ, London 1680 (Wing L.3094)Google Scholar, sig. A3, 471.

⁷⁹ Scott, J., Algernon Sidney and the Restoration Crisis, 1677–1683, Cambridge 1991Google Scholar; Krey, G. S. De, London and the Restoration, 1659–1683, Cambridge 2005, 169–331, and especially pp. 178–9Google Scholar, 204, 207, 213 for hostility towards persecuting bishops; Spurr, Restoration Church, 75–80.

⁸⁰ Pierce, Thomas, A seasonable caveat against the dangers of credulity, in trusting the spirits before we try them, London 1679 (Wing P.2196)Google Scholar, 2, 8–9.

⁸¹ Puller, Timothy, The moderation of the Church of England, London 1679 (Wing P.4197)Google Scholar, 97, 101, 145, 149–50, 484.

⁸² Hickes, George, The spirit of enthusiasm exorcised, London 1680 (Wing H.1871)Google Scholar, 38, 40, 41–2. For the sermon and reaction to it see Quantin, The Church of England and Christian antiquity, 301–4, 308–10.

⁸³ Glanvill, Joseph, Some discourses, sermons and remains, ed. Horneck, Anthony, London 1681 (Wing G.831)Google Scholar, 124, 415, 416–17. Glanvill had died in 1680, and the pieces in this collection are undated, but they had not been published in his 1676 Essays.

⁸⁴ [Boyle, Robert], A discourse of things above reason, London 1681 (Wing B.3944), 6–13Google Scholar, 16, 20, 88. On Boyle's distinctions see especially Holden, T., ‘Robert Boyle on things above reason’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy xv (2007), 283–312Google Scholar.

⁸⁵ Rust, George, A discourse of the use of reason in matters of religion, London 1683 (Wing R.2361)Google Scholar, sig. a, 26, 27, 28, 61–2.

⁸⁶ N. N., Vox clamantis; or, A cry to Protestant dissenters, London 1683 (Wing N.63)Google Scholar, 56, 58, 64; Rust, Discourse, 58.

⁸⁷ Horwitz, H., ‘Protestant reconciliation in the Exclusion crisis’, this Journal xv (1964), 201–17Google Scholar; Haigh, ‘“Theological wars”’, 347–50; Burnet, Gilbert, An exhortation to peace and unity, London 1681 (Wing B.5787)Google Scholar.

⁸⁸ [Baxter], The judgment, 1. For a brief but sensitive discussion see Spurr, ‘“Rational religion”’, 582–4.

⁸⁹ [Baxter], The judgment, 11.

⁹⁰ Owen, Pneumatologia, sigs A2, c–c2, 22–3, 206.

⁹¹ Clagett, Discourse, 54, 116–17, 189–95, 283–5, 306. Bishop Pearson's classic Exposition of the Creed had noted that individual understanding was illuminated by the Holy Spirit, but did not specify how this happened: Pearson, John, An exposition of the Creed, 4th edn, London 1676 (Wing P.998), 327–8Google Scholar.

⁹² Manton, One hundred and ninety sermons, 206–7, 531; Bates, Harmony of the divine attributes, 133–41.

⁹³ Humfrey, John, Peaceable disquisitions … In some animadversions on a discourse writ against Dr Owen's book of the Holy Spirit, London 1678 (Wing H.3702)Google Scholar, 84, 95.

⁹⁴ [Glanvill], A seasonable recommendation and defence, 1.

⁹⁵ Glanvill, ‘Anti-fanatical religion’, in Essays, 17.

⁹⁶ Owen, Causes, waies & means, 249.

⁹⁷ [Baxter], The judgment, 20.

⁹⁸ Ramsbottom, J. D., ‘Presbyterians and partial conformity in the Restoration Church of England’, this Journal xliii (1992), 249–70Google Scholar; Goldie, M., Roger Morrice and the Puritan whigs, Woodbridge 2016, 226–34Google Scholar, 246–51; [Baxter], The judgment, 2.

⁹⁹ The other tracts were The judgment of Non-conformists about the difference between grace and morality; The judgment of Non-conformists of things indifferent; The judgment of Non-conformists of things sinful by accident and of scandal; and What meer Non-conformity is not (Wing B.1292). Though all were printed in 1676, only the tract on reason was issued then and the others were apparently held back until 1680: Baxter, Richard, The second part of the Nonconformists plea for peace, London 1680 (Wing B.1402)Google Scholar, sig. A2, and Reliquiae, pt iii, 185, 188; Goldie, Roger Morrice, 260 and n.

¹⁰⁰ Goldie, Roger Morrice, 226–7, 237–8, 245–6.

¹⁰¹ Heylyn, Peter, Aerius redivivus; or, The history of the Presbyterians, Oxford 1670 (Wing H.1681)Google Scholar; Saywell, William, The original of all the plots in Christendom, with the danger and remedy of schism, London 1680 (Wing S.802)Google Scholar. Heylyn had died in 1662, but Aerius redivivus was not published until 1670 when it presumably served against the comprehension campaign.

¹⁰² Calendar of the correspondence of Richard Baxter, ed. Keeble, N. H. and Nuttall, G. F., Oxford 1991Google Scholar, nos 683, 692, 705, 710, 711, 740, 822, 854, 857, 862; S. P., Brief account of the new sect, 11–12; [Fowler], Principles and practices, 332–3; Goldie, M. and Spurr, J., ‘Politics and the Restoration parish: Edward Fowler and the struggle for St Giles Cripplegate’, English Historical Review cix (1994), 582–96Google Scholar; Spurr, ‘“Latitudinarianism”’, 78.

¹⁰³ [Alsop], Anti-Sozzo, 380, 622; Beddard, ‘Vincent Alsop’, 162–7; Thomas, R., ‘Comprehension and indulgence’, in Chadwick, O. and Nuttall, G. F. (eds), From uniformity to unity, 1662–1962, London 1962, 204–9Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁴ Standish, A sermon, 23, 25; Grove, A vindication, 11–12, 60; [Patrick, Simon?], An earnest request to Mr John Standish &c, London 1676 (Wing E.98A0, 11)Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁵ Spurr, ‘“Rational religion”’, 563, 571–7; Stillingfleet, Origines sacrae, 112, and A rational account, 175, 178–9.

¹⁰⁶ [Alsop], Anti-Sozzo, 273; Glanvill, ‘Anti-fanatical religion and free philosophy’, 16; [Fowler], Principles and practices, 334; Rivers, Reason, grace and sentiment, 36–7.

¹⁰⁷ Fowler, Design of Christianity, sig. A4; Haigh, ‘“Theological wars”’, 326–37; Spurr, Restoration Church of England, 311–22; D. D. Wallace, Puritans and predestination: grace in English Protestant theology, 1525–1695, Chapel Hill 1982, 158–82; Hampton, S., Anti-Arminians: the Anglican Reformed tradition from Charles II to George I, Oxford 2008, 39–76Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁸ Patrick, Symon, The parable of the pilgrim, London 1665 (Wing P.826), 140–4Google Scholar; [Patrick, Simon], Falshood unmask't, in answer to a book called Truth unveil'd, London 1676 (Wing P.796)Google Scholar, 7; Rivers, Reason, grace and sentiment, 59–88. Bayly's book was still selling well: Green, I., Print and Protestantism in early modern England, Oxford 2000Google Scholar, 349.

¹⁰⁹ Baxter, Richard, Richard Baxter's Catholicke theologie, plain, pure and peaceable, for the pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours, London 1675 (Wing B.1209)Google Scholar, sig. a2.

¹¹⁰ For the Nonconformist charge see especially Jenkyn, William, Celeusma, se clamor ad theologos hierarchiae anglicanae, London 1679 (Wing J.634)Google Scholar, 44 and passim; Moulin, Lewis du, A short and true account of the several advances the Church of England hath made towards Rome, London 1680 (Wing D.3553)Google Scholar, 7, 9, 26, 31, 34; and Owen, The nature of apostasie, 157–8, 163.

¹¹¹ Stillingfleet, Edward, The mischief of separation, London 1680 (Wing S.5604)Google Scholar, sig. A3, 21; [Hughes, William], An endeavour for peace among Protestants, London 1680 (Wing W.3341), 19Google Scholar; A collection of cases and other discourses, London 1685 (Wing C.5114–15)Google Scholar [originally published as separate tracts in 1683]), i. 1.7, 8.57, 9.10, 18; ii. 9. 3–4.

¹¹² [Alsop], Melius inquirendum, sig. A4, 41, 178; [idem], The mischief of impositions; or, An antidote against a late discourse, London 1680 (Wing A.2917)Google Scholar, sig. C2, 5, 27–8 (where Alsop used the same case for congregational independence as Owen, John, A brief vindication of the Non-conformists, London 1680 [Wing O.723], 16–20Google Scholar).