Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:49:48.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engaging the Estranged: Reciprocity and Cooperation on the Korean Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Taehyun Kim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

North Korea has become the focus of international attention once again. In October 2002 it admitted to a visiting U.S. envoy of having a clandestine nuclear program through uranium enrichment, which is a violation of, among other things, the bilateral agreement it signed with the United States eight years ago. In retaliation, the United States canceled shipment of heavy fuel oil to North Korea, that shipment being part of the agreement to compensate for North Korea's abandonment of its nuclear program. Since then, North Korea has astonished the world with a series of highly provocative moves: it restarted the nuclear facilities that it had frozen since 1994; expelled the inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); declared immediate withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT); and threatened to resume test-firing long-range missiles that it voluntarily stopped in 1998.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , May 2003 , pp. 169 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38, No. 1: 226–254.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A., ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chosun Ilbo. March 11, 1999, and March 13, 2001.Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. 1962. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1986. “Reciprocity in United States–Soviet Relations: Multiple Symmetry or Issue Linkage?” American Journal of Political Science 30, No. 2: 421–445.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 1991. “Reciprocity in Superpower Relations: An Empirical Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 35, No. 2: 195–209.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S., and Pevehouse, Jon C. 1997. “Reciprocity, Bullying, and International Cooperation: Time-series Analysis of the Bosnia Conflict.” American Political Science Review 91, No. 3: 515–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42, No. 3: 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1953. “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept, or Propaganda?” World Politics 5, No. 4: 442–477.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1980. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.” World Politics 32, No. 3: 357–405.Google Scholar
Hankyoreh. December 26, 1998, p. 3.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30, No. 2: 167–214.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1982. “The Demand for International Regimes.” International Organization 36, No. 2: 325–355.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40, No. 1: 1–27.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches.” International Studies Quarterly 32, No. 4: 379–396.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Kihl, Young Whan. 1997. “U.S.-DPRK Nuclear Accord and KEDO.” Asian Perspective 21, No. 2: 99–117.Google Scholar
Dae-jung, Kim. 1999. Public Addresses of President Kim Dae-jung. Vol. 1. Seoul: Chongwadae [in Korean].Google Scholar
Dae-jung, Kim. 2001. Public Addresses of President Kim Dae-jung. Vol. 3. Seoul: Chongwadae [in Korean].Google Scholar
Dae-jung, Kim. 2002. Public Addresses of President Kim Dae-jung. Vol. 4. Seoul: Chongwadae [in Korean].Google Scholar
Taehyun, Kim. 1991. “Superpower Rivalry in the Third World, 1948–1978: A Systematic Analysis of the Dynamics of the U.S.-Soviet Foreign Policy Interaction and Its Consequences.” Ph.D. diss. Department of Political Science, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Sam, Kim Young. 1994. Public Addresses of President Kim Young Sam. Vol. 1. Seoul: Chongwadae [in Korean].Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Korean Energy Development Organization (KEDO). 2002. Annual Report 2001.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.” World Politics 28, No. 3: 317–347.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism.” International Organization 46, No. 4: 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazarr, Michael J. 1995. North Korea and the Bomb: A Case Study in Nonproliferation. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 1986. “Issue-Linkage and the Evolution of International Cooperation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 30, No. 1: 141–170.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations.” World Politics 44, No. 3: 466–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times. January 11, 2003. “Korea Crisis: Same Song, Second Verse.”Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 1988. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism.” World Politics 40, No. 2: 235–251.Google Scholar
Oberdorfer, Don. 1997. The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. “Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.” World Politics 38, No. 1: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A., ed. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahre, Robert. 1998. “Reactions and Reciprocity: Tariffs and Trade Liberalization from 1815 to 1914.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, No. 4: 467–492.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42, No. 3: 427–460.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Carolyn. 1989. “Reciprocity in Trade: The Utility of a Bargaining Strategy.” International Organization 43, No. 2: 273–299.Google Scholar
Richardson, Lewis F. 1960. Arms and Insecurity: A Mathematical Study of the Causes and Origins of War. Pittsburgh: Boxwood Press.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, Susan, and Watkins, Michael. 1995. Carrots, Sticks, and Question Marks: Negotiating the North Korean Nuclear Crisis, parts A and B. Case Studies in Public Policy and Management Nos. 1297 and 1298. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1992. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.” International Organization 46, No. 3: 561–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G., ed. 1993. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sigal, Leon V. 1998. Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Roger K. 1987. “Explaining the Non-Proliferation Regime: Anomalies for Contemporary International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41, No. 2: 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991. “International Cooperation Among Relative Gains Maximizers.” International Studies Quarterly 35, No. 4: 387–402.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. 1980. “The Politics of Linkage.” World Politics 33, No. 1: 62–81.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. 1962. “National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol.” In Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1982. “Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes.” International Organization 36, No. 2: 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar