Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T12:46:15.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of stocking density during the dry period on dairy cow physiology, metabolism and behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

Mayumi Fujiwara ,
Marie Haskell ,
Alastair Macrae  and
Kenny Rutherford
Mayumi Fujiwara*
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour & Welfare team, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Research Group, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK
Marie Haskell
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour & Welfare team, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Research Group, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK
Alastair Macrae
Affiliation:
Dairy Herd Health and Productivity Service, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Kenny Rutherford
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour & Welfare team, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Research Group, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mayumi Fujiwara, Email: Mayumi.Fujiwara@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of high stocking density during the dry period on dairy cow physiology, behaviour and welfare were investigated. Holstein Friesian cows (n = 48, calving over a seven month period) were dried-off 60 ± 4 d before their expected calving date, and allocated to either high (H) or low (L) stocking density groups. Cows were housed in cubicles from dry-off to 21 d before calving and then moved to straw yards until calving. In cubicle pens, H and L cows had 0.5 vs. 1.0 feed yokes/cow and 1.0 vs. 1.5 cubicles/cow, respectively, and in straw yards, 0.3 m vs. 0.6 m linear feed-face space and 6 m2vs. 12 m2 lying space, respectively. Video observations of feeding behaviour during the 3 h after feed delivery (3 d/week) and agonistic interactions at the feed-face during peak feeding (2 d/week) were made. Daily lying proportion was measured using an accelerometer device throughout the dry period. Concentrations of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGCM) at dry-off, d7 and d35 after dry-off and d21 and d7 before calving and the change in energy metabolites (glucose, NEFA, BHB) from dry-off to d7 before calving were measured. H cows were less likely to start feeding within 5 min of feed delivery and spent less time feeding compared to L cows, but they engaged in displacements more frequently and spent more time standing in the feed alley. Irrespective of the treatment groups, FGCM concentrations significantly increased from dry-off to d7 after dry-off and remained higher during the dry period. Stocking density did not affect daily lying proportion, energy metabolites during the dry period and milk yield during subsequent lactation. This study found that whilst high stocking density during the dry period increased competition at the feed-face and altered feeding behaviour, it did not affect stress responses, energy metabolism or subsequent milk yield.

Keywords

Peripartum periodstocking densitywelfare
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 283 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeVries, TJ, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2004) Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1432–1438.Google Scholar
Endres, MI, DeVries, TJ, von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM (2005) Short communication: effect of feed barrier design on the behavior of loose-housed lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2377–2380.Google Scholar
Estevez, I, Andersen, IL and Nævdal, E (2007) Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 103, 185–204.Google Scholar
Fregonesi, JA, Tucker, CB and Weary, DM (2007) Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3349–3354.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, M, Haskell, MJ, Macrae, AI and Rutherford, KMD (2018) Survey of dry cow management on UK commercial dairy farms. Veterinary Record vetrec-2017-104755.Google Scholar
Fustini, M, Galeati, G, Gabai, G, Mammi, LE, Bucci, D, Baratta, M, Accorsi, PA and Formigoni, A (2017) Overstocking dairy cows during the dry period affects dehydroepiandrosterone and cortisol secretion. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 620–628.Google Scholar
Huzzey, JM, DeVries, TJ, Valois, P and von Keyserlingk, MAG (2006) Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 126–133.Google Scholar
Huzzey, JM, Nydam, DV, Grant, RJ and Overton, TR (2012) The effects of overstocking Holstein dairy cattle during the dry period on cortisol secretion and energy metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4421–4433.Google Scholar
Jouany, J-P (2006) Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Animal Reproduction Science 96, 250–264.Google Scholar
Kok, A, van Knegsel, ATM, van Middelaar, CE, Hogeveen, H, Kemp, B and de Boer, IJM (2015) Technical note: validation of sensor-recorded lying bouts in lactating dairy cows using a 2-sensor approach. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 7911–7916.Google Scholar
Kondo, S and Hurnik, JF (1990) Stabilization of social hierarchy in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 27, 287–297.Google Scholar
Lobeck-Luchterhand, KM, Silva, PRB, Chebel, RC and Endres, MI (2014) Effect of prepartum grouping strategy on displacements from the feed bunk and feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 2800–2807.Google Scholar
Manson, FJ and Leaver, JD (1988) The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47, 185–190.Google Scholar
Mechor, GD, Gröhn, YT and van Saun, RJ (1991) Effect of temperature on colostrometer readings for estimation of immunoglobulin concentration in bovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3940–3943.Google Scholar
Mulvany, PM (1977) A body condition scoring technique for use with British Friesian cows. Animal Production 24, 157–158.Google Scholar
NRC (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Palme, R and Möstl, E (1997) Measurement of cortisol metabolites in faeces of sheep as a parameter of cortisol concentration in blood. International Journal of Mammalian Biology 62, 192–197.Google Scholar
Palme, R, Robia, C, Messmann, S, Hofer, J and Möstl, E (1999) Measurement of faecal cortisol metabolites in ruminants: a non-invasive parameter of adrenocortical function. Wiener Tierarztliche Monatsschrift 86, 237–241.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, KL, Veira, DM, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG (2009) Competition at the feed bunk changes the feeding, standing, and social behavior of transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 3116–3123.Google Scholar
Red Tractor Assurance for Farms Dairy Standards (2017) 1 October 2017. Available at http://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/contentfiles/Farmers-5614.pdf (Accessed 15 October 2018).Google Scholar
Schirmann, K, Chapinal, N, Weary, DM, Heuwieser, W and von Keyserlingk, MAG (2011) Short-term effects of regrouping on behavior of prepartum dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2312–2319.Google Scholar
Silva, PRB, Dresch, AR, Machado, KS, Moraes, JGN, Lobeck-Luchterhand, K, Nishimura, TK, Ferreira, MA, Endres, MI and Chebel, RC (2014) Prepartum stocking density: effects on metabolic, health, reproductive, and productive responses. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 5521–5532.Google Scholar
Talebi, A, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Telezhenko, E and Weary, DM (2014) Reduced stocking density mitigates the negative effects of regrouping in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 1358–1363.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, BJ, Haskell, MJ, Langford, FM, Roberts, DJ and Morgan, CA (2010) Are cows more likely to lie down the longer they stand? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124, 1–10.Google Scholar
Tuyttens, FAM (2005) The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 261–282.Google Scholar
von Keyserlingk, MAG, Olenick, D and Weary, DM (2008) Acute behavioral effects of regrouping dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1011–1016.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Fujiwara et al. supplementary material

Fujiwara et al. supplementary material 1

Download Fujiwara et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 729.8 KB