No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Kazi U-gyen and Lord Curzon's Letter of 1901: A Footnote
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2011
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0021911800147151/resource/name/firstPage-S0021911800147151a.jpg)
- Type
- Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1967
References
1 Foreign Department Proceedings, Secret External, Nos. 276–550, June 1910, office-note, pp. 24–25.
References to the interview are also to be found in Minto to Morley, letter, March 17, 1901 and Morley to Minto of the same date, Minto Papers. Complimenting the Viceroy on his handling of the Lama “with entire correctness,” Morley warned: “But we must not take his story for gospel, still less must we allow him to set England and China at loggerheads for the sake of his beaux yeux.”
2 Spencer Harcourt Butler had been Deputy Commissioner at Lucknow from where Lord Minto picked him up in 1907 to be Secretary in the Foreign Department. Later he was to be the first Education Member of the Viceroy's Executive Council.
3 Proceeding No. 305, in 1 Supra, Telegram P, No. 7/S, dated (and received) March 3, 1910.
4 Proceeding No. 334 in Foreign Department, Internal B, February 1912, Nos. 334–37.
5 P. L. Mehra, “Kazi U-gyen: ‘A Paid Tibetan Spy?’”, JRCAS, LI, 3–4, July-October 1964, 301–5.