Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T03:00:45.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Aramaic Epigraphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

From the earliest days of Assyriology, the neo-Assyrian deeds bearing Aramaic annotations have attracted interest for the light they throw on both of the languages involved. Since L. Delaporte compiled his Epigraphes araméens in 1912, containing thirty such texts, no more have been published. The same collection contains four pieces wholly in Aramaic and to these can be added the six from Assur published by M. Lidzbarski, Altaramäische Urkunden aus Assur (WVDOG 38), 1921, and five from Tell Halaf, published by J. Friedrich in Die Inschriften von Tell Halaf (AfO Beiheft 6 (1940)). An examination of the script of these epigraphs has been made by S. J. Liebermann, BASOR 192 (1968), 25–31. All of these texts, together with the dockets of the neo-Babylonian and Persian periods, have been collected in catalogue form recently by F. Vattioni, Augustinianum 10 (1970), 493–532. The purpose of the present paper is to make some more of these texts available.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1972 , pp. 131 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sir Henry Rawlinson used them as a proof of the accurate decipherment of cuneiform in JRAS NS 1 (1865), 187246Google Scholar.

2 See Iraq 27 (1965), 1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See Parker, B. H., Iraq 16 (1954), 2958CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Cf. Layard, A. H., A Second Series of the Monuments of Nineveh (1853), pl. 69, no. 20Google Scholar; Porada, E., CANES I, no. 793Google Scholar; ND 3307, Parker, B. H., Iraq 17 (1955), 125, fig. 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 I am indebted to Dr. Edith Porada for this identification, and for discussing these impressions with me.

6 On the use of l denoting recipients in earlier administrative texts, see Rainey, A. F., “Some Prepositional Nuances in Ugaritic Administrative Texts”, Proceedings of the International Conference of Semitic Studies, Jerusalem (1963), 206207Google Scholar.

7 See Kutscher, E. Y., JAOS 74 (1954), 241242Google Scholar.

8 As Ylvisaker, S. C. hinted long ago, Zur babylonischen und assyrischen Grammatik (1912), 55Google Scholar.

9 See Finkelstein, J. J., AnSt 7 (1957), 142Google Scholar; von Soden, W., Or NS 35 (1966), 8Google Scholar.