Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:53:09.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil characteristics drive Ficaria verna abundance and reproductive output

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2019

Justin P. Kermack  and
Emily S. J. Rauschert Open the ORCID record for Emily S. J. Rauschert [Opens in a new window]
Justin P. Kermack
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Emily S. J. Rauschert*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Emily S. J. Rauschert, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115. (Email: e.rauschert@csuohio.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lesser celandine (Ficaria verna Huds.), an invasive plant from Europe, is becoming widespread in river valleys throughout the northeastern United States and the Pacific Northwest. Its high rate of asexual bulbil and tuber production creates dense infestations threatening native spring ephemerals. Ficaria verna abundance and reproductive output (seeds, bulbils, and tubers) were examined in invaded transects spanning a disturbance gradient away from a river. Site characteristics (photosynthetically active radiation [PAR], soil pH, moisture, texture, and nutrients) were quantified to examine their roles in plant abundance and reproduction. A larger-scale study examined random transects not specifically chosen based on F. verna infestations. Soil characteristics and slope were hypothesized to drive F. verna abundance and reproduction; we also hypothesized that reproductive output and biomass would be highest at intermediate distances from rivers, where disturbances are infrequent. Ficaria verna abundance and reproductive output varied considerably by site; soil characteristics, rather than landscape placement, appeared to drive plant abundance and reproduction. Lower percent sand was associated with significantly higher F. verna stem density and bulbil and tuber production. CEC was significantly negatively related to F. verna biomass and tuber counts. In the larger-scale survey, slope and PAR were significantly negatively related to F. verna presence and percent cover, respectively. Overall, these findings suggest that soil texture and slope can help explain higher abundance and reproductive outputs. However, reproductive output and biomass were not significantly greater at intermediate distances, contrary to expectations. We did not observe any seed production in any of the plots, although we did see a few plants with seeds outside our study area in the second year, demonstrating a near-complete reliance on asexual reproduction in these populations. This study expands on the current limited understanding of F. verna and can help management by identifying areas likely to support dense infestations.

Keywords

Invasion successsite characteristicssoil characteristics
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 214 - 222
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Jacob N. Barney, Virginia Tech

References

Arizaga, S, Ezcurra, E (1995) Insurance against reproductive failure in a semelparous plant: bulbil formation in Agave macroacantha flowering stalks. Oecologia 101:329–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axtell, AE, DiTommaso, A, Post, AR (2010) Lesser celandine (Ranunculus ficaria): a threat to woodland habitats in the Northern United States and Southern Canada. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:190–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badri, MA, Minchin, PE, Lapointe, L (2007) Effects of temperature on the growth of spring ephemerals: Crocus vernus . Physiol Plant 130:67–76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, SCH (2015) Influences of clonality on plant sexual reproduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:8859–8866 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B, Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daubenmire, RF (1959) A canopy-cover method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci 33:43–46 Google Scholar
Deng, T, Kim, C, Zhang, D, Zhang, J, Li, Z, Nie, Z, Sun, H (2013) Zhengyia shennongensis: a new bulbiliferous genus and species of the nettle family (Urticaceae) from central China exhibiting parallel evolution of the bulbil trait. Taxon 62:89–99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, GW, Bauder, JW (1979) Particle size analysis by hydrometer: a simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measurement parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:1004–1007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S (1999) Local and regional diversity in a patchy landscape: native, alien, and endemic herbs on serpentine. Ecology 80:70–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillmer, J, Garman, B (2016) Lesser celandine. Cleveland Metroparks Invasive Plants Atlas. http://cleveland-metroparks.github.io/atlas/contact/contact.html. Accessed: October 1, 2015Google Scholar
Hobbs, RJ, Humphries, SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 9:761–770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, TG, Gurevitch, J, Hyatt, L, Carreiro, M, Lerdau, M (2004) Forest invasibility in communities in southeastern New York. Biol Invasions 6:393–410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, S, Singh, HP, Batish, DR, Kohli, RK, eds (2013) Invasive Plant Ecology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 302 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, F, Bohning-Gaese, K, Prinzing, A (2008) Life history variation across a riverine landscape: intermediate levels of disturbance favor sexual reproduction in the ant-dispersed herb Ranunculus ficaria . Ecography 31:776–786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertabad, S, Mohassel, MH, Mahalati, MN, Gherekhloo, J (2013) Some biological aspects of the weed lesser celandine (Ranunculus ficaria). Planta Daninha 31:577–585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, PS, Proctor, J (2001) Why plants grow poorly on very acid soils: are ecologists missing the obvious? J Exp Bot 52:791–799 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB, Christensen, RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyer, I (2005) Predicting plant species’ responses to river regulation: the role of water level fluctuations. J Appl Ecol 42:239–250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lite, SJ, Bagstad, KJ, Stromberg, JC (2005) Riparian plant species richness along lateral and longitudinal gradients of water stress and flood disturbance, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA. J Arid Environ 63:785–813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, J (2008) Workplan for Lesser Celandine (Ranunculus ficaria) Control in Rocky River Reservation. Cleveland, OH: Cleveland Metroparks Technical Report 2008/NR-05. 15 pGoogle Scholar
Marsden-Jones, EM (1935) Ranunculus ficaria Linn: life-history and pollination. J Linn Soc Lond Bot 50:39–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, JA, Emery, SM (2015a) Leaf litter depth has only a small influence on Ranunculus ficaria (Ranunculaceae) biomass and reproduction. Am Midl Nat 173:30–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, JA, Emery, SM (2015b) The showy invasive plant Ranunculus ficaria facilitates pollinator activity, pollen deposition, but not always seed production for two native spring ephemeral plants. Biol Invasions 17:2329–2337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, JA, Emery, SM (2016) Do multiple mechanisms drive the dominance of an invasive plant (Ranunculus ficaria, Ranunculaceae) along an urban stream? J Torrey Bot Soc 143:359–366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Rauschert, ESJ, Nord, AN, Jones, BP (2009) The role of roads in plant invasions. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 2:191–199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porazinska, DL, Bardgett, RD, Blaauw, MB, Hunt, HW, Parsons, AN, Seastedt, TR, Wall, DH (2003) Relationships at the aboveground–belowground interface: plants, soil biota, and soil processes. Ecol Monogr 73:377–395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Google Scholar
Roxburgh, SH, Shea, K, Wilson, J (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85:359–371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swearingen, JM (2005) Lesser celandine. Plant Conservation Alliance Alien Plant Working Group. https://www.nps.gov/plants/ALIEn/fact/rafi1.htm. Accessed: September 20, 2016Google Scholar
Tsui, CC, Chen, ZS, Hsieh, CF (2004) Relationships between soil properties and slope position in a lowland rain forest of southern Taiwan. Geoderma 123:131–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, EC, Klinger, R, Moore, PE (2004) Predicting patterns of non-native plant invasions in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Divers Distrib 10:447–459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eck, WH, Van de Steeg, HM, Blom, CW, De Kroon, H (2004) Is tolerance to summer flooding correlated with distribution patterns in river floodplains? A comparative study of 20 terrestrial grassland species. Oikos 107:393–405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, WN, Ripley, BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer. 497 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshie, F (2008) Effects of growth temperature and winter duration on leaf phenology of a spring ephemeral (Gagea lutea) and a summergreen forb (Maianthemum dilatatum). J Plant Res 121:483–492 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, NJ, Saveliev, AA, Smith, GM (2009) Mixed Effect Models and Extension in Ecology with R. New York: Springer. 529 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar