Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:40:42.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress towards the Eradication of Mikania Vine (Mikania micrantha) and Limnocharis (Limnocharis flava) in Northern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Simon J. Brooks ,
F. Dane Panetta  and
Kylie E. Galway
Simon J. Brooks
Affiliation:
Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, Tropical Weeds Research Centre, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Water, P.O. Box 187, Charters Towers, Queensland 4820, Australia
F. Dane Panetta*
Affiliation:
Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, Alan Fletcher Research Station, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Water, P.O. Box 36, Sherwood, Queensland 4075, Australia
Kylie E. Galway
Affiliation:
Previously Project Coordinator, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, currently Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Parks Division North Region, Conservation Planning, P.O. Box 2066, Cairns 4870, Queensland, Australia
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dane.panetta@dpi.qld.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To eradicate a weed invasion, its extent must be delimited and each infestation must be extirpated. Measures for both of these criteria are utilized to assess the progress of current eradication programs targeting mikania vine and limnocharis in northern Australia. The known infested area for each species is less than 5 ha and has remained largely static for the last 3 or more years against a backdrop of refined and enhanced detection methods. This suggests that delimitation has been approached, if not achieved. Different methods of detection have their places, relative to the stage of the program and the spatial distribution of infestations. Although all known infestations of both species are effectively monitored and controlled, ongoing emergence from persistent seed banks limits progress towards the extirpation of infestations to a slow, but measurable, rate.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinefluroxypyr, [(4-amino-3,5-dichloro-6-fluoro-2-pyridinyl)oxy]acetic acidlimnocharis, Limnocharis flava (L.) Buchenau LIFL5mikania vine (mile-a-minute), Mikania micrantha Kunth MIKMIDelimitationextirpationinvasive
Type
Case Study
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 296 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, L. W. 2005. California's reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: a model for invasive species rapid response. Biol. Invasions 7:1003–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomford, M. and O'Brien, P. 1995. Eradication or control for vertebrate pests. Wildl. Soc. Bull 23:249–255.Google Scholar
Buddenhagen, C. E. 2006. The successful eradication of two blackberry species Rubus megalococcus and R. adenotrichos (Rosaceae) from Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos, Ecuador. Pac. Conserv. Biol 12:272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacho, O. J., Spring, D., Pheloung, P., and Hester, S. 2006. Evaluating the feasibility of eradicating an invasion. Biol. Invasions 8:903–917.Google Scholar
Champion, P. D. and Clayton, J. S. 2003. The evaluation and management of aquatic weeds in New Zealand. Pages 429–434. in Child, L., Brock, J. H., Brundu, G., Prach, K., Wade, P. M., and Williamson, M., editors. Plant Invasions: Ecological Threats and Management Solutions. Leiden, Netherlands Backhuys.Google Scholar
Cronk, C. B. and Fuller, J. L. 1995. Plant Invaders. London Chapman and Hall. 241.Google Scholar
Csurhes, S. and Edwards, R. 1998. Potential Environmental Weeds in Australia: Candidate Species for Preventative Control. Brisbane, Australia Queensland Department of Natural Resources 208 p.Google Scholar
Cunningham, D. C., Woldendorp, G., Burgess, M. B., and Barry, S. C. 2003. Prioritising Sleeper Weeds for Eradication: Selection of Species Based on Potential Impacts on Agriculture and Feasibility of Eradication. Canberra, Australia Bureau of Resource Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 24.Google Scholar
Holloran, P. 2006. Measuring performance of invasive plant eradication efforts in New Zealand. N. Z. Plant Prot 59:1–7.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds—Distribution and Biology. Honolulu University Press of Hawaii. 320–327.Google Scholar
IUCN 1994. IUCN Red List Categories. Gland, Switzerland Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar
Karim, R. S. M., Man, A. B., and Sahid, I. B. 2004. Weed problems and their management in rice fields of Malaysia: an overview. Weed Biol. Manage 4:177–186.Google Scholar
Kotalawala, J. 1976. Noxious water vegetation in Sri Lanka: the extent and impact of existing infestations. Pages 51–58. in Varshney, C. K. and Rzoska, J., editors. Aquatic Weeds in S.E. Asia. The Hague, Netherlands Dr W. Junk B.V. Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. and Lonsdale, W. M. 2002. Eradicating invasive plants: hard-won lessons for islands. Pages 164–172. in Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N., editors. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Auckland, New Zealand Invasive Species Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
Mooney, H. A. and Cleland, E. E. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:5446–5451.Google Scholar
Nayar, B. K. and Sworupanandan, K. 1978. Morphology of the fruit and mechanism of seed dispersal of the freshwater weed Limnocharis flava . Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Sect. B 87:49–53.Google Scholar
Ogle, B. M., Dao, H. T. A., Mulokozi, G., and Hambraeus, L. 2001. Micronutrient composition and nutritional importance of gathered vegetables in Vietnam. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr 52:485–499.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D. 2007. Evaluation of the performance of weed eradication programs: containment and extirpation. Divers. Distrib 13:33–41.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D. and Lawes, R. 2005. Evaluation of the performance of weed eradication programs: the delimitation of extent. Divers. Distrib 11:435–442.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D. and Lawes, R. 2007. Evaluation of the Australian branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) eradication program. Weed Sci 55:644–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panetta, F. D. and Timmins, S. M. 2004. Evaluating the feasibility of eradication for terrestrial weed invasions. Plant Prot. Q 19:5–11.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ 52:273–288.Google Scholar
Pokorny, M. L. and Krueger-Mangold, J. M. 2007. Evaluating Montana's dyer's woad (Isatis tinctoria) cooperative eradication project. Weed Technol 21:262–269.Google Scholar
Regan, T. J., McCarthy, M. A., Baxter, P. W., Panetta, F. D., and Possingham, H. P. 2006. Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant. Ecol. Lett 9:759–766.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal. Pages 249–253. in Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N., editors. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Auckland, New Zealand Invasive Species Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2002. Today Tiritiri Matangi, tomorrow the world! Are we aiming too low in invasives control. Pages 4–12. in Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N., editors. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Auckland, New Zealand Invasive Species Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2003. Eradication—preventing invasions at the outset. Weed Sci 51:247–253.Google Scholar
Sinden, J., Jones, R., Hester, S., Odom, D., Kalisch, C., James, R., and Cacho, O. 2004. The economic costs of weeds to Australia. Technical Series no. 8. Glen Osmond, South Australia CRC for Australian Weed Management. 65.Google Scholar
Swarbrick, J. T. 1997. Weeds of the Pacific Islands. Technical Paper 209. Noumea, New Caledonia South Pacific Commission. 124.Google Scholar
Swinscow, T. D. V. 1976. II–Mean from frequency distribution. Br. Med. J. 1:1325-1326.Google Scholar
Tye, A. 2007. Cost of rapid-response eradication of a recently introduced plant, tropical kudzu (Pueraria phaseoloides), from Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. Plant Prot. Q 22:33–34.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. 1986. Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference. Pages 163–176. in Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J., editors. Biological Invasions in North American and Hawaii. New York Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Walker, L. R. and Smith, S. D. 1997. Impacts of invasive plants on community and ecosystem properties. Pages 69–86. in Luken, J. O. and Thieret, J. W., editors. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York Springer.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, B. M. 2003. Know your enemy: records of potentially serious weeds in northern Australia, Papua New Guinea and Papua (Indonesia). Telopea 10:477–484.Google Scholar
Woldendorp, G. and Bomford, M. 2004. Weed eradication: strategies, timeframes and costs. Canberra, Australia Bureau of Resource Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 30.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. Y., Ye, W. H., Cao, H. L., and Feng, H. L. 2004. Mikania micrantha H.B.K. in China—an overview. Weed Res 44:42–49.Google Scholar