Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of Glyphosate for Managing Giant Reed (Arundo donax)

  • David F. Spencer (a1), Wailun Tan (a2), Pui-Sze Liow (a1), Greg G. Ksander (a1), Linda C. Whitehand (a3), Sharon Weaver (a4), Jesse Olson (a5) and Mark Newhouser (a5)...

Abstract

Giant reed is an invasive plant of riparian habitats throughout California and the United States. Glyphosate is approved for controlling giant reed in California. Sources indicate that 1.5% to 5% glyphosate solutions are effective at controlling giant reed. There is little published data on the relative efficacy of different concentrations of glyphosate which can be used to select an appropriate application regime for California habitats. We conducted two field experiments to test the hypothesis that glyphosate concentrations of 1.5%, 3%, and 5% applied as foliar sprays were equally effective at killing giant reed plants. Leaf chlorophyll content and the proportion of living stems declined significantly following treatment with 1.5% or greater solutions of glyphosate. New stems were observed the spring following treatment for plants treated with 1.5% glyphosate. No new stems were observed for plants treated with either 3% or 5% glyphosate. A treatment that included “bending and breaking” stems prior to treatment with 5% glyphosate provided control similar to 5% glyphosate alone. There was no there evidence that plants sprayed with only a mixture of the surfactant (Agridex), water, and a marking dye were affected beyond the short-term. These results indicate that 3% or 5% foliar applications with glyphosate were the most effective and consistent treatments for killing giant reed with a single late-season application. This result is especially important if the goal of the treatment program is to minimize the number of treatments, thus reducing labor costs and minimizing impacts on sensitive habitats by reducing the number of site visits.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: dfspencer@ucdavis.edu

References

Hide All
Bell, G. 1997. Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in Southern California. Pages 103113. in Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D., editors. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden. The Netherlands Blackhuys.
Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H., and von Ende, C. N. 1998. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. 4th ed. Boston, MA McGraw Hill. 273.
California Department of Food and Agriculture 2007. http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/ipc/encycloweedia/pdfs/noxiousweed_ratings.pdf. Accessed: November 16 2007.
Cook, C. D. K. 1990. Aquatic Plant Book. The Hague SPB Academic Publishing. 220.
DiTomaso, J. M. and Healy, E. A. 2003. Aquatic and Riparian Weeds of the West. Oakland, CA University of California Press. 441.
Dudley, T. 2000. Arundo donax L. Pages 5358. in Bossard, C. C., Randall, J. M., and Hoshovsky, M. C., editors. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.
Esposti, M. D. D., de Siqueira, D. L., Pereira, P. R. G., Venegas, V. H. A., Salomao, L. C., and Filho, J. A. M. 2003. Assessment of nitrogenized nutrition of citrus rootstocks using chlorophyll concentrations in the leaf. J. Plant Nutr 26:12871299.
Finn, M. and Minnesang, D. 1990. Control of giant reed grass in a southern California riparian habitat. Restor. Manag. Notes 8:5354.
Jackson, N. E. 1994. Control of Arundo donax; techniques and pilot project. Pages 2733. in Jackson, N. E., Randsen, P., and Douthit, S., editors. Proceedings, November 1993 Arundo donax Workshop. Ontario, CA.
Knepel, K. 2003. Determination of Nitrate in 2M KCl soil extracts by Flow Injection Analysis. QuikChem Method 12-107-04-1-B. Loveland, CO Lachat Instruments.
Litell, R., Milliken, G., Stroup, W., Wolfinger, R. L., and Schabenberger, O. 2006. SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC SAS Institute, Inc. 633.
Lowrey, J. and Watson, J. 2004. Tamarisk and Arundo control on Cache Creek. Pages 8283. in. Proceedings of the California Weed Science Society. San Jose, CA California Weed Science Society.
Office of the Secretary of State Figure: 4 TAC §19.300(a). 2007. http://info.sos.state.tx.us/fids/200701978-1.html. Accessed: November 16, 2007.
Olsen, S. R. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Phosphorus. Pages 403430. in Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R., editors. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, WI American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
Perdue, R. E. Jr 1958. Arundo donax—Source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot 12:368404.
Richardson, D. M., Pysek, P., Rejmanek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., and West, C. J. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib 6:93107.
Rieger, J. P. and Kreager, D. A. 1989. Giant reed (Arundo donax): a climax community of the riparian zone. Pages 222225. in. Protection, Management, and Restoration for the 1990s: Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference, September 22–24, 1988, Davis, California. General Technical Report PSW-110. Berkeley, CA USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
Rodriguez, I. R. and Miller, G. L. 2000. Using a chlorophyll meter to determine the chlorophyll concentration, nitrogen concentration, and visual quality of St. Augustine grass. Hortscience 35:751754.
SAS Institute, Inc 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc. 3884.
SAS Institute, Inc 2004. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary, NC SAS Institute, Inc.
Sharma, K. P., Kushwaha, S. P. S., and Gopal, B. 1998. A comparative study of stand structure and standing crops of two wetland species, Arundo donax and Phragmites karka, and primary production in Arundo donax with observations on the effect of clipping. Trop. Ecol 39:314.
Spencer, D. F. and Ksander, G. G. 1987. Comparison of three methods for extracting chlorophyll from aquatic macrophytes. J. Freshw. Ecol 4:201208.
Spencer, D. F., Ksander, G. G., and Whitehand, L. C. 2005. Spatial and temporal variation in RGR and leaf quality of a clonal riparian plant: Arundo donax . Aquat. Bot 81:2736.
Spencer, D. F., Liow, P-S., Chan, W. K., Ksander, G. G., and Getsinger, K. D. 2006. Estimating Arundo donax shoot biomass. Aquat. Bot 84:272276.
Spencer, D. F., Sher, A. A., Thornby, D., Liow, P-S., Ksander, G. G., and Tan, W. 2007. Non-destructive assessment of Arundo donax (Poaceae) leaf quality. J. Freshw. Ecol 22:277285.
Stelljes, K. B. 2001. Research off the beaten path. Agric. Res. Mag 49:1417.
Team Arundo del Norte 2007. Arundo control and management. http://www.ceres.ca.gov/tadn/. Accessed: November 16, 2007.
Thomas, G. W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. Pages 159165. in Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R., editors. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, WI American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
Tracy, J. L. and DeLoach, C. J. 1999. Suitability of classical biological control for giant reed (Arundo donax) in the United States. Pages 73109. in Bell, C. E., editor. Arundo and Saltcedar: The Deadly Duo. Proceedings of the Arundo and Saltcedar Workshop, June 17, 1998, Ontario, California. Holtville, CA University of California Cooperative Extension.
Weaver, J. E. 1927. Review: Structure of Texas vegetation. Ecology 8:484487.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed