Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-28jzs Total loading time: 0.963 Render date: 2021-03-07T14:19:44.899Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

The decision of the European Union to expand to Central and Eastern Europe is a puzzle for rationalist intergovernmentalism. This approach to the study of European integration accounts for most of the preferences of the state actors and many characteristics of the intergovernmental bargaining process but fails to explain why it resulted in the opening of accession negotiations. I introduce the mechanism of rhetorical action in order to show how the supporters of enlargement succeeded in overcoming the superior material bargaining power of their opponents. Through the strategic use of arguments based on the liberal norms of the European international community, the “drivers” caught the “brakemen” in the community trap and, step by step, shamed them into acquiescing in Eastern enlargement.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Baldwin, Richard E. 1994. Towards an Integrated Europe. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard E., Francois, Joseph F., and Portes, Richard. 1997. The Costs and Benefits of Eastern Enlargement: The Impact on the EU and Central Europe. Economic Policy 24:125–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardi, Luciano. 1996. Italy and EU Enlargement. In East-Central Europe and the EU: Problems of Integration, edited by Kaiser, Karl and Brüning, Martin, 155–66. Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. 1996. Identity and Alliances in the Middle East. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 400–47. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Thomas Jerome. 1999. Rhetoric as a Framework for Analyzing Cultural Constraint and Change. Current Perspectives in Social Theory 19:165–85.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. 1992. Europe and the Challenge of Enlargement. Europe Documents (Agence Internationale d'Information pour la Press, English ed.) 1790, 3 July 1992.Google ScholarPubMed
Commission of the European Communities. 1997. Agenda 2000—Summary and Conclusions of the Opinions of Commission Concerning the Applications for Membership to the European Union Presented by the Candidate Countries (DOC/97/8).Google Scholar
Deubner, Christian. 1999. Frankreich in der Osterweiterung der EU, 1989 bis 1997. Politische Studien 50 (363):89121.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. 1998. The New Institutionalisms: Avenues of Collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154 (4):696705.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1991. Introduction. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., 138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989a. Social Norms and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4):99117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989b. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1992. Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblée Constituante. In Rationality and Institutions: Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard, edited by Malnes, Raino and Underdal, Arild, 1350. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Ene, Constantin. 1997. Romania Sets Its Sights on NATO Membership. NATO Review 45 (6):811. Available at ⟨www.nato.int/docu/review/rev95-6.htm⟩.Google Scholar
European Council. 1989. Conclusions of the Presidency, Strasbourg, December 1989. Bulletin of the European Communities 22 (12).Google Scholar
European Council. 1993. Conclusions of the Presidency, Copenhagen, June 1993. Bulletin of the European Communities 26 (6).Google Scholar
European Council. 1995. Conclusions of the Presidency, Madrid, December 1995. Bulletin of the European Communities 28 (12).Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. 1999. Dialogues of Manoeuvre and Entanglement: NATO, Russia, and the CEECs. Millennium 28 (1):2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin, and Wiener, Antje. 1999. Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (5):721–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friis, Lykke. 1998. “The End of the Beginning” of Eastern Enlargement—Luxembourg Summit and Agenda-setting. European Integration Online Papers 2 (7). Available at ⟨eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1998a-007.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Friis, Lykke, and Murphy, Anna. 1999. The European Union and Central and Eastern Europe: Governance and Boundaries. Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (2):211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Tsebelis, George. 1996. An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism. International Organization 50 (2):269–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. 1984. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather, and Hughes, Kirsty. 1998. Enlarging the EU Eastwards. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hagen, Jürgen von. 1996. The Political Economy of Eastern Enlargement of the EU. In Coming to Terms with Accession, edited by Ambrus-Lakatos, Lorand and Schaffer, Mark E., 141. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
Ham, Peter van. 1993. The EC, Eastern Europe, and European Unity: Discord, Collaboration, and Integration Since 1947. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hayward, Jack. 1996. Britain and EU Enlargement. In East-Central Europe and the EU: Problems of Integration, edited by Kaiser, Karl and Brüning, Martin, 147–54. Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.Google Scholar
Holvêque, Stéphanie. 1998. L'Union européenne s'ouvre à l'est. Revue du Marché Commun et de l'Union Européenne 421:514–23.Google Scholar
Inotai, András. 1998. The CEECs: From the Association Agreements to Full Membership. In The Expanding European Union: Past, Present, Future, edited by Redmond, John and Rosenthal, Glenda G., 157–76. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Institut für europäische Politik (in cooperation with Trans European Policy Studies Association). 1998. Enlargement/Agenda 2000-Watch. Pilot issue. Available at ⟨http://www.tepsa.be⟩.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Ian. 1999. Treating Institutions as Social Environments: The Role of Persuasion and Social Influence in Eliciting Cooperation. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Karatnycky, Adrian, Motyl, Alexander, and Shor, Boris, eds. 1997. Nations in Transit 1997: Civil Society, Democracy, and Markets in East Central Europe and the Newly Independent States. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1997. United Germany in an Integrating Europe. In Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 148. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J, Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D., eds. 1999. Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kawecka-Wyrzykowska, Elzbieta. 1996. On the Benefits of the Accession for Western and Eastern Europe. In Coming to Terms with Accession, edited by Ambrus-Lakatos, Lorand and Schaffer, Mark E., 85107. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4):379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S. Jr 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kreile, Michael. 1997. Eine Erweiterungsstrategie für die Europäische Union. In Europa öffnen. Anforderungen an die Erweiterung, edited by Weidenfeld, Werner, 203–72. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Kumar, Andrej. 1996. The CEE Countries' Aspirations for Enlargement. In Coming to Terms with Accession, edited by Ambrus-Lakatos, Lorand and Schaffer, Mark E., 4284. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
Lipgens, Walter. 1982. A History of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1993. The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism. In Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Practice of an International Form, edited by Ruggie, John Gerard, 91121. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, Alan. 1998. Recreating Europe: The European Union's Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michalski, Anna, and Wallace, Helen. 1992. The European Community and the Challenge of Enlargement. 2d ed. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4):473524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe, European Journal of International Relations 1 (2):157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Nee, Victor, and Strang, David. 1998. The Emergence and Diffusion of Institutional Forms. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154 (4):706–15.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. 1998. European Identity, EU Expansion, and the Integration/Exclusion Nexus. Alternatives 23 (3):397416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, John M. 1994. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19 (2):87125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions. International Organization 51 (4):555–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Pascal. 1997. Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Beitrittsbedingungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54(1):139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas P. 1995. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. In Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Practice of an International Form, edited by Ruggie, John Gerard, 347. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saryusz-Wolski, Jacek. 1994. The Reintegration of the “Old Continent”: Avoiding the Costs of “Half Europe.” In Economic and Political Integration in Europe: Internal Dynamics and Global Context, edited by Bulmer, Simon and Scott, Andrew, 1928. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 1995. Debatten zwischen Staaten. Eine Argumentationstheorie internationaler Systemkonflikte. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 1997. Rhetorisches Handeln in der internationalen Politik. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 4 (2):219–54.Google Scholar
Jürgen, Schwarz, ed. 1980. Der Aufbau Europas. Pläne und Dokumente 1945–1980. Bonn: Osang Verlag.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1991. Unpacking Institutional Arguments. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., 164–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 1998. The European Union's Association Policy Towards the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Policy Paradigms and Collective EU Identity in a Composite Policy. Ph.D. diss., University of Essex.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2000. Eastern Enlargement: Risk, Rationality, and Role-Compliance. In Risks, Reforms, Resistance, and Revival, edited by Cowles, Maria Green and Smith, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, Ulrich, and Wallace, Helen. 1996. Policies Toward Central and Eastern Europe. In Policy-Making in the European Union, 3d ed., edited by Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William, 353–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P. 2000. Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2):293316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesamt, Statistisches, ed. 1998. Statistisches Jahrbuch für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel.Google Scholar
Tangermann, Stefan. 1995. Osterweiterung der EU: Wird die Agrarpolitik zum Hindernis? Wirtschaftsdienst 75 (9):484–91.Google Scholar
Payá, Torreblanca, Ignacio, José. 1997. The European Community and Central Eastern Europe (1989–1993): Foreign Policy and Decision-Making. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, Rieke, Richard, and Janik, Allan. 1979. An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Védrine, Hubert. 1996. Les mondes de François Mitterrand. A l'Elysée 1981–1995. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven. 1994. Origins of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. International Organization 48 (1):138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weise, Christian, Brücker, Herbert, Franzmeyer, Fritz, Lohdahl, Maria, Möbius, Uta, Schultz, Siegfried, Schuhmacher, Dieter, and Trabold, Harold. 1997. Ostmitteleuropa auf dem Weg in die EU-Transformation, Verflechtung, Reformbedarf. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 1992. Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik. Grundlegung und Anwendung des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 3488 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 7th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *